The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 April 2020, 06:37 PM   #1
Max 66
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Real Name: Max66
Location: On Earth
Posts: 302
Submariner No Data 14060M vs Explorer II 16570 Polar

Good morning to everybody, I am considering to buy a 5 digit Rolex and I cannot make a decision between the Sub No Data years 2000 (available with dial 2 lines till 2007 and 4 lines starting from 2008) and the Explorer II Polar.
I see more particular the Explorer, but the charm of the Sub No Data catch my eyes every time a look at it.
Which one would you suggest me to go?
I would appreciate to get also yours considerations about the suggestion.
Thanks in advance to everyone.
Max 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 07:35 PM   #2
SkyJuice
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Land of OZ
Posts: 1,411
Get both if you can. I think the polar explorer and the sub compliment each other. If i had to choose one it would be the polar explorer first.
SkyJuice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:11 PM   #3
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
You need to buy the one you like the most.
Personally I prefer the Explorer II.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:14 PM   #4
mat355
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyJuice View Post
Get both if you can. I think the polar explorer and the sub compliment each other. If i had to choose one it would be the polar explorer first.

Great suggestion

40mm polar and 4 line ND...great combo

I have a ND and 40mm black Exp - I'd like to trade it for a polar if I can...
mat355 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:16 PM   #5
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
A 2-liner sub is hard to beat, however I think I’d pick the Polar in this case...
The Sub is awesome but the clasp is a little bulky for everyday wear. Just my opinion.
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:25 PM   #6
Njw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Uk
Posts: 72
I’ve had both and they’re both good choices. The Explorer II is a great under the radar Rolex. The sub gets noticed. The Explorer II is also good value as you’re getting the GMT and date complications. It’s a great tool watch and goes with anything. I love the white dial, feels more unique.
Njw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:27 PM   #7
SDREW22
"TRF" Member
 
SDREW22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: CNY
Watch: TOG
Posts: 582
Will you be using the GMT function? I love the look of the polar, but chose my 14060m because I have no need for a GMT complication.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
SDREW22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:29 PM   #8
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,764
I would start with the Submariner as it will be more difficult, the longer you wait, to acquire one at a good price and in the right condition. The Explorer has had a brief burst of popularity that has been caused by the lack of other models being available. I have always preferred the Rolex Divers to any other model and if you stopped with one watch the Submariner could work for life.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:48 PM   #9
Chester01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast
Watch: 16610
Posts: 4,933
I mean I always go function first. Between the two, polar. It has a date function and gmt hand. If it was a sub data and Explorer Ii, I find I use the data and I find much use for the bezel to measure elapsed time or I use it as a reminder of an appointment. Can’t do that with the Explorer ii, though I do love that watch.
Chester01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:51 PM   #10
LChanyungco
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: EU
Posts: 84
I would go for the 14060M. I feel that the "old" 40mm Explorer II is kind of a "cheap" GMT 2.
LChanyungco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:53 PM   #11
4vCoupe
"TRF" Member
 
4vCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 795
Submariner No Data 14060M vs Explorer II 16570 Polar

I had the exp2 and sold it to pick up a very good condition 14060m 2 liner. Looking back I wish I would have kept the explorer and just spent the extra money to get the sub. I do like my sub but miss the polar dial.

Bottom line get both.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
4vCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:57 PM   #12
Larry81
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Lawrence
Location: Guildford
Watch: sub, ex2, mg white
Posts: 34
As others have said both is ideal, but if only one is an option id personally go ex2. Just a more versatile watch and in my personal opinion the best rolex reference available.
Larry81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 11:27 PM   #13
erekose
"TRF" Member
 
erekose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Japan
Posts: 54
I'd go with the sub.
I had the Exp2 for a couple years and never really bonded to it. Ironically it has so many people talking about what an underdogs it is that it's gotten over-hyped IMO.

This is just my perspective however, and there will be many others.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
erekose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 12:06 AM   #14
Geelerald
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Tennessee
Watch: Explorer II Polar
Posts: 83
I got the polar explorer 2 and have never regretted it. I was right on the verge of adding a 2 liner 14060m before the pandemic tanked the market. When things get back to normal I am definitely adding the sub. Get both.
Geelerald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 12:19 AM   #15
Max 66
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Real Name: Max66
Location: On Earth
Posts: 302
Thanks to all of you for precious advice. I always had black and blue Rolex, so I am a bit concerned if with time I will get enough of white dial .... for the moment it gives to me the idea of something different and unique.
The photos posted by 4vCoupe confirmed that are both wonderful watches.
I think I should try to search for both and let's see which one comes with a good deal first.
Max 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 01:41 AM   #16
Oyster Sauce
"TRF" Member
 
Oyster Sauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,866
What Rolex models do you already have? And if you currently don't have any Rolexes, what is the model that comes to your mind first when you daydream about Rolex?

The Explorer II is the most functionality in a value package -- if you have misgivings about the polar dial and are more comfortable with a black dial, there are plenty of black-dialed Exp II options out there (you'll also save money vs. the Polar).

However, if you always imagine a Sub when you think about Rolex and don't currently have one, it is a really difficult choice to argue with. Best wishes.
Oyster Sauce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 01:51 AM   #17
SydR
"TRF" Member
 
SydR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 338
I bought a Sub first (6 digit) then added a polar Explorer II (5 digit) later. Like them both equally well.
SydR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 02:21 AM   #18
iliketime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jack
Location: NYC
Watch: 16570, 16710
Posts: 1,535
I first saw the 16570 in a friend's second hand watch shop and could not let it go. If I had seen the 14060M, i might have bought that first. It eventually became the third rolex I grabbed. Both are solid choices.
iliketime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 02:32 AM   #19
jason10mm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: TN, USA
Posts: 161
I have both. It would be a hard choice, but I would lean towards the sub. But if you travel and need a date, the exp2 is wonderful. It is my go to travel watch and is a bit more strap friendly than the sub (IMHO). But the 2 liner 14060M.....exquisite!

Just get both, this is a devils dilemma :P
jason10mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 02:48 AM   #20
Meyrin
"TRF" Member
 
Meyrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Ian
Location: Hamburg
Watch: Sub 14060
Posts: 1,163
Take your time! Which one "sings" to you the loudest and most in tune? I´m a Sub fan, but have always liked the Explorer II Polar over any other dial variation! Difficult decision but, as others have posted, get both if you can!
Meyrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 03:03 AM   #21
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
I prefer the 16570 polar
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 08:13 AM   #22
Max 66
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Real Name: Max66
Location: On Earth
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oyster Sauce View Post
What Rolex models do you already have? And if you currently don't have any Rolexes, what is the model that comes to your mind first when you daydream about Rolex?

The Explorer II is the most functionality in a value package -- if you have misgivings about the polar dial and are more comfortable with a black dial, there are plenty of black-dialed Exp II options out there (you'll also save money vs. the Polar).

However, if you always imagine a Sub when you think about Rolex and don't currently have one, it is a really difficult choice to argue with. Best wishes.
Thanks for your reply. I had some Rolex, always Sub and GMT. The best two have been:
a) the 1st important watch, a Bluesy bought new in 1992 and kept for many, many years
and
b) a GMT Batman, bought new six years ago and still with me
try to guess which color they have in commune?
From one side I would like to remain loyal to Sub and from the other side to introduce another sporty Rolex. Black Explorer is not really an option for me, because in this case I would go for 14060M with no doubts.
To make this dilemma even more complicate, there is still an almost silent voice that tells me bluesy, bluesy, bluesy
Max 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 08:27 AM   #23
Oyster Sauce
"TRF" Member
 
Oyster Sauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max 66 View Post
Thanks for your reply. I had some Rolex, always Sub and GMT. The best two have been:
a) the 1st important watch, a Bluesy bought new in 1992 and kept for many, many years
and
b) a GMT Batman, bought new six years ago and still with me
try to guess which color they have in commune?
From one side I would like to remain loyal to Sub and from the other side to introduce another sporty Rolex. Black Explorer is not really an option for me, because in this case I would go for 14060M with no doubts.
To make this dilemma even more complicate, there is still an almost silent voice that tells me bluesy, bluesy, bluesy
Since you still have the GMT Batman, and you gravitate toward the color blue, neither of the references you’re looking at seem like the best choice. I think the voice inside that says “bluesy” tells it all...you should get a Bluesy (I assume from your post that you had it in the past but currently don’t). I don’t think anything else will satisfy you.
Oyster Sauce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 10:07 AM   #24
CAMP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Mike
Location: Chicago
Watch: GMT
Posts: 34
Polar. I think the GMT function puts it over the top. Have you tried them on side by side?
CAMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 11:59 AM   #25
regaltrojan
"TRF" Member
 
regaltrojan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hawaii
Watch: 16600 et al
Posts: 158
I'd go with the 14060m first.
regaltrojan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 03:24 PM   #26
huba01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,449
14060 all day long
huba01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 04:20 PM   #27
Livermoron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Watch: 14060M & 16570
Posts: 114
These 2 are the rolexes I own. The 2 line 14060M and a polar ex 2. If I could only own 1. I’d probly keep the sub
Livermoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2020, 01:17 AM   #28
eskiserkan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Bursa
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 493
Get both if you can. Sub is iconic, the polar is the best companion with great case size, dial & movement etc.
eskiserkan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2020, 01:22 AM   #29
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,597
These are my two favorite and have been an anchor in my collection. G serial sub /P serial Exp II.

Either choice is a winner, my most critical recommendation is the exp II must also have lugholes. As a perfect travel watch I always enjoy having strap options available.

If you can’t decide, just find the best deal you can for the cleanest example.

.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2020, 02:52 AM   #30
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,906
Wait 4 months or so and get both for what you’ll pay for one today
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.