The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 July 2020, 04:03 PM   #1
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Tell me about your Explorer 2 !

So I saw a gentleman at the store today wearing a Rolex 216570

Now I’m kind of interested in that one too haha

My wrist is 6.75 inches

Do you think I can pull it off? My daily is a 36mm Datejust

Also, does the explorer 2 wear a lot bigger than a 6 digit submariner?

Lastly, post any pics of your explorer 2!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 04:07 PM   #2
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721

This is how my Datejust 36 fits for reference


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 04:18 PM   #3
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Tell me about your Explorer 2 !

Quote:
Originally Posted by schoolboy View Post


This is how my Datejust 36 fits for reference





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Look for a 5 digit 40mm. The 6 digit wears larger then the SD43 lug to lug. I dont think your wrist can handle the 6 digit 42mm. The 5 digit explorer 2 wears smaller then a 6 digit sub for reference.

This is my Explorer ll 40mm vs my DJll 41mm. 7.25 inch wrist for reference. And I wear a SD43 daily.
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 04:22 PM   #4
John McM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 216570 Black Dial
Posts: 9
My wrist is 7 1/2 inches. I think you might struggle with the 216570
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 7FD8836A-0067-4BE5-A7FF-EAB4FFC4851F.jpeg (83.0 KB, 804 views)
John McM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 04:28 PM   #5
MRPWRPATX21
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 343
Icon14

16570 is the jam. Works for me, and I have 8” wrists, but definitely fine for 6.5”. It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 6935348D-9D7E-46FA-BD5A-17F3E820D5F5.jpeg (75.8 KB, 786 views)
MRPWRPATX21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 04:35 PM   #6
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Dang :(

That is not what I wanted to hear, though I do thank you guys for the honest feedback!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 05:12 PM   #7
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Tell me about your Explorer 2 !

Quote:
Originally Posted by schoolboy View Post
Dang :(

That is not what I wanted to hear, though I do thank you guys for the honest feedback!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Could be worse. You could have 7.25 inch wrist where almost the entire Rolex lineup form 36-44mm is wearable. Damn these expensive wrist I am cursed with lol. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 05:13 PM   #8
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Tell me about your Explorer 2 !

The explorer ll 216570 even though it’s only 42mm wears larger then my 126600 SD43. The lug to lug is larger. To me it the explorer ll wore like the 43mm and the SD43 wore like a 42mm. If that makes any sense.
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 05:21 PM   #9
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
42mm Black or Polar ,or both.
Will be fine for your wrists.Wears flat .
Your choice !
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 05:28 PM   #10
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Tell me about your Explorer 2 !

Quote:
Originally Posted by TswaneNguni View Post
42mm Black or Polar ,or both.

Will be fine for your wrists.Wears flat .

Your choice !


You think so? I think the DJ36 is his sweet spot. Maybe he could wear a 39mm, or a 5 digit sub. I don’t know if any of the 40mm + 6 digits would fit his wrist that well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 06:52 PM   #11
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
You think so? I think the DJ36 is his sweet spot. Maybe he could wear a 39mm, or a 5 digit sub. I don’t know if any of the 40mm + 6 digits would fit his wrist that well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My wife wears 36mms .DD and DJ36.
Tiny wrists .
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 07:03 PM   #12
MYBROTHERSKEEPER
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: US
Posts: 90
Schoolboy, the 42 mm is way too big for your size wrist. I suggest the 40 mm 16570 polar. Beautiful watch boy. I had my heart set on the 42 mm so I tried it and it looked too big on my 7 3/4 in wrist. Going to get the 40 someday soon. Best of luck.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
MYBROTHERSKEEPER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 07:11 PM   #13
BumbleB
"TRF" Member
 
BumbleB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: ASEAN/DC/EU
Watch: ing you
Posts: 2,776
One of my favourite watches. It wears quite flat on the wrist, more subtle than a GMT II or Sub.

Lug to lug maybe a bit wider.

If you think 42mm is too big, try to get a 40mm BNIB.











Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
♛ Milgauss 116400GV ♛ Deepsea D-Blue 116660 ♛ Submariner 114060 ♛ Submariner 116613LN ♛ Exp. II black 216570 ♛ Exp. II white 226570 ♛ Sky Dweller white 326933 ♛ Sky Dweller Blue 326934 ♛ GMT II 116710 black ♛ GMT II 126710BLRO ♛ GMT II 126711CHNR ♛ GMT II 126710BLNR ♛ Daytona 116509 ♛ DD40 228238 H HUBLOT BIG BANG e ceramic C CHANEL J12 3125 AP 3120 MVT
BumbleB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 07:24 PM   #14
Lew Archer
"TRF" Member
 
Lew Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: L.A., Calif.
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 2,220
I also think the 42mm Explorer II would be a bit much. That 36mm DJ looks like your ideal size, at least from that photograph.

If you take a look at the Rolex website...look up the Oyster Perpetual. Configure one with the 36mm case. You'll see there is a white dial option. It is a classic, simple watch. It may not have the sports feel you are looking for, however.

If you could find the 36mm Explorer, that would be excellent for you. Black dial, only. Classic model (and Ian Fleming wore one, if that matters to you). The current Explorer is 39mm. The 36mm Explorer gets a lot of love here, an iconic model. And, for you, perfectly proportioned.

Full disclosure: I tend to think that overly large watches run the risk of wearing the person, rather than the person wearing the watch. Many other people like the look of a massive watch. So, it's just a matter of taste, and that's entirely subjective.

In the end, get what YOU like and what looks and feels right to you. And, there's no substitution for trying on watches to figure that out.
Lew Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 08:27 PM   #15
abozz
"TRF" Member
 
abozz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: In my home.
Watch: 116660, 126600
Posts: 2,905
6.7 is no too small, you can wear it.

Enviado desde mi SM-G975F mediante Tapatalk
abozz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 08:43 PM   #16
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by schoolboy View Post
Dang :(

That is not what I wanted to hear, though I do thank you guys for the honest feedback!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 09:57 PM   #17
DLRIDES
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by schoolboy View Post
So I saw a gentleman at the store today wearing a Rolex 216570

Now I’m kind of interested in that one too haha

My wrist is 6.75 inches

Do you think I can pull it off? My daily is a 36mm Datejust

Also, does the explorer 2 wear a lot bigger than a 6 digit submariner?

Lastly, post any pics of your explorer 2!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Whether the 216570 is “too big”, is something only you can decide. With a 6.75 wrist it should have a nice modern look.

By the numbers, lug to lug/end link to end link :

114060/116610 - 48mm & 51mm

216570 - 50 & 53mm

You may want to find one of the extremely rare undersized SD43’s mentioned above. Due to their small case size being an anomaly, the future value is sure to increase.

126600 - 50.4 & 53.7

Note at minute 1:24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1cux6V9lhA
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”.
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 10:00 PM   #18
911991
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: maryland
Watch: GMT II Evr, SUB
Posts: 657
using mine as a daily...
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg image0.jpeg (128.4 KB, 635 views)
File Type: jpeg fullsizeoutput_158.jpeg (144.8 KB, 640 views)
911991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2020, 10:44 PM   #19
BlueGlacier
"TRF" Member
 
BlueGlacier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Europe
Posts: 32
I think there was this guy on youtube i saw a while back. He compared the size of a sub hulk and an exII (216570) on his wrist which he said was 6.5 inches (or something like that).

As i remember it looked good, a bit on the bigger side but not too big.

If you want it you should get it. Wrist size should be ok.
BlueGlacier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 12:07 AM   #20
briansp82593
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 75
I’ve got a 216570 white dial here. On my 6.5” wrist.

It has been my favorite out of the six Rolex watches I’ve owned.

I sold off my YG submariner and bought the explorer immediately after.

At first I had the same dilemma “is it too big on me?” It’s not. I can say that with confidence.

I do consider myself a traditionalist when it comes to size. I much prefer the 36mm DJ to the larger models. I kind of hover around 40mm for the “sport” watches. I think the SD43 is too big. Bloated anyway.

Compared to the other 40mm Rolex’s I’ve had, sure it’s a little bigger. At least in a pleasing way- to me. And compared to the 16570? Looks much more modern. The orange 24H hand and the bezel makes it look so much nicer. I’d absolutely still own one whether it was 42mm or 40mm.
briansp82593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 12:19 AM   #21
Melanotaenia
"TRF" Member
 
Melanotaenia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NYC
Watch: Explorers and Subs
Posts: 620
With this watch, I would say you won't know for sure until you try it on.
__________________
16570 -- 16600 -- 16610 -- 116610LV -- 216570 -- 116400
Melanotaenia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 12:46 AM   #22
Daveclock
"TRF" Member
 
Daveclock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Dave
Location: UK
Watch: ing and waiting!
Posts: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
Look for a 5 digit 40mm. The 6 digit wears larger then the SD43 lug to lug. I dont think your wrist can handle the 6 digit 42mm. The 5 digit explorer 2 wears smaller then a 6 digit sub for reference.

This is my Explorer ll 40mm vs my DJll 41mm. 7.25 inch wrist for reference. And I wear a SD43 daily.
Ouch that is a classic sausage wrist it hurts me just looking at it!
Please wear it loose and above the bendy part of wrist, if only just for me?
Daveclock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 12:53 AM   #23
StillTrying
"TRF" Member
 
StillTrying's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Space
Watch: 16570, black
Posts: 965
You’d be able to wear the 42mm Explorer. Try one on if you can, it’s the only way to know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
StillTrying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 02:37 AM   #24
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
Could be worse. You could have 7.25 inch wrist where almost the entire Rolex lineup form 36-44mm is wearable. Damn these expensive wrist I am cursed with lol. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haha good for you


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 02:38 AM   #25
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
The explorer ll 216570 even though it’s only 42mm wears larger then my 126600 SD43. The lug to lug is larger. To me it the explorer ll wore like the 43mm and the SD43 wore like a 42mm. If that makes any sense.

Thanks for sharing that. It makes perfect sense


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 02:38 AM   #26
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by TswaneNguni View Post
42mm Black or Polar ,or both.
Will be fine for your wrists.Wears flat .
Your choice !

I think I am going to try to find one so that I can try it on


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 02:40 AM   #27
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by MYBROTHERSKEEPER View Post
Schoolboy, the 42 mm is way too big for your size wrist. I suggest the 40 mm 16570 polar. Beautiful watch boy. I had my heart set on the 42 mm so I tried it and it looked too big on my 7 3/4 in wrist. Going to get the 40 someday soon. Best of luck.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I know a lady that was selling a new old stock 40mm explorer 2, but maaaaan, she wanted $13,000 i think.

That was about a year ago. I guess I could check in and see if she still has it, but i don’t wAnt to pay a huge premium like that.

And I’m always nervous about buying a used watch.
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 02:42 AM   #28
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by BumbleB View Post
One of my favourite watches. It wears quite flat on the wrist, more subtle than a GMT II or Sub.

Lug to lug maybe a bit wider.

If you think 42mm is too big, try to get a 40mm BNIB.











Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More subtle than a sub?



I guess I should just try it on

This is how my sub used to fit:




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 02:54 AM   #29
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew Archer View Post
I also think the 42mm Explorer II would be a bit much. That 36mm DJ looks like your ideal size, at least from that photograph.

If you take a look at the Rolex website...look up the Oyster Perpetual. Configure one with the 36mm case. You'll see there is a white dial option. It is a classic, simple watch. It may not have the sports feel you are looking for, however.

If you could find the 36mm Explorer, that would be excellent for you. Black dial, only. Classic model (and Ian Fleming wore one, if that matters to you). The current Explorer is 39mm. The 36mm Explorer gets a lot of love here, an iconic model. And, for you, perfectly proportioned.

Full disclosure: I tend to think that overly large watches run the risk of wearing the person, rather than the person wearing the watch. Many other people like the look of a massive watch. So, it's just a matter of taste, and that's entirely subjective.

In the end, get what YOU like and what looks and feels right to you. And, there's no substitution for trying on watches to figure that out.

I wish Rolex still made the 36mm Explorer.

Thanks for the feedback!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 02:54 AM   #30
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by abozz View Post
6.7 is no too small, you can wear it.

Enviado desde mi SM-G975F mediante Tapatalk

Thanks, I might go try one on if I can find one !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.