ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 August 2020, 02:46 PM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: J.R.
Location: Texas
Posts: 802
|
This is interesting.
|
6 August 2020, 03:48 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
|
This is highly unlikely to the point of being a super rare error, but mistakes do happen. If you send it to RSC, which serial will they use?!
Parenthetically your LV looks in fantastic shape. |
6 August 2020, 03:59 PM | #33 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
|
Quote:
they refuse to service (obviously) if they believe its fake, but they do hand it back. |
|
6 August 2020, 04:01 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 116515LN | 124300
Posts: 289
|
The case engraving between lugs look weird, I would suggest bring it to RSC for verification.
|
6 August 2020, 04:08 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: London
Posts: 23
|
Thanks again all. I did hear Rolex keep the watches if fake / stolen which is why I was dubious about taking it into them. If they hand it back if it’s a fake then that’s a different story, I shall do that.
It was not bought new, but from someone I know who knows Rolex watches and deals with them on the net.. he went through so many rules to make sure he was buying a genuine one (off a genuine seller) and he admitted he missed the engraving between the lugs because it was only one digit short. He’s shown me pictures of the movement on his PC, also I’ve had the movement checked. I may write to Rolex with this but doubt I’ll hear anything back. I absolutely love the watch, and having subs / explorers before, it just ‘feels’ right, it shines in all the right places and looks amazing. ‘Every’ fake fake I’ve seen online I can spot something that’s untoward. Who would put a real movement in a fake watch!? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 August 2020, 04:13 PM | #36 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
|
|
6 August 2020, 04:19 PM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: London
Posts: 23
|
|
6 August 2020, 04:22 PM | #38 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,761
|
Yes, lots of added value, double serial number +++
Omission of one number by Rolex ++++ Correct papers +++++ OP, ask RSC for a service quote, if anything wrong you will hear. When all good you have a written RSC statement. ++++++ and a unique watch
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
6 August 2020, 04:22 PM | #39 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
|
Quote:
why dont you bite the bullet and call your RSC and ask them "If you do find that its not genuine do you confiscate it?" |
|
6 August 2020, 04:28 PM | #40 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: London
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
This sounds very optimistic lol! But great for me if this happened. I’ll try and find a number for my nearest one. Thank you! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 August 2020, 04:29 PM | #41 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: London
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
I know Kostas, but it is a bit scary lol. I’ll try and call them this week as I know the St james’ park is closed at the moment (London). I do think they’ll just say the numbers don’t match, cya later.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 August 2020, 07:01 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
I truly suspect this may be one of those fake Submariners (the really good fake ones). I’m very sorry. It may even have a genuine movement. The serial numbers are consistent with the ones on these Submariners too.
Watchout section please. |
6 August 2020, 07:09 PM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
The print between the lugs looks off to me
|
6 August 2020, 07:33 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
I hope this doesn't infringe site rules, just trying to prove a point and help the guy.. I strongly suspect his watch is fake. Over 2000hits and nobody caught it, that's how frightening this is.
M565XXX |
6 August 2020, 07:56 PM | #45 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
|
wait, what? is it the same serial? or the same first digits, I can't see it clearly lol
Sarky450, any comment? |
6 August 2020, 08:00 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London
Watch: 114060LB
Posts: 3,986
|
Same first digits. The last three look like 024 but that is worrying.
|
6 August 2020, 08:06 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
No smoke without fire guys.. Rolex either made a crazy mistake and also used a known fake serial run or that is a super fake as above. Hmm...
|
6 August 2020, 08:13 PM | #48 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: London
Posts: 23
|
I suspect mine is fake now. I’m going to contact who I did the trade with and see if we can go back
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 August 2020, 08:19 PM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 70
|
Fake case with possibly genuine movement and other parts.
|
6 August 2020, 08:25 PM | #50 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
|
|
6 August 2020, 08:28 PM | #51 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
|
6 August 2020, 08:56 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,450
|
Maybe I´m wrong, but I just compared your pics with my 16610LN and I might think the crystal sits a little to high ?
|
6 August 2020, 09:19 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: South Africa
Posts: 873
|
|
6 August 2020, 09:39 PM | #54 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
|
|
6 August 2020, 09:58 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: NY Metro
Posts: 680
|
Kermits are scary things these days.
Hope it works out well.
__________________
Rolex 15010 Date -16013 TT DJ 16610LV -16750 GMT-16600 SD 16710 GMT -Tudor 79280 |
6 August 2020, 10:05 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: CNY
Watch: TOG
Posts: 582
|
Post this in the "watch out" section. The experts there will give you the answer you are looking for.
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk |
6 August 2020, 10:23 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,601
|
Sounds like an interesting detail.
There were not many cases that were stamped twice during the transition to engraved Rehaut. It would be especially strange for a counter fitter to bother stamping twice, let alone having two different stamps...this would make the least sense to me. Rolex will want to “fix” it.
__________________
|
6 August 2020, 10:26 PM | #58 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
Quote:
|
|
6 August 2020, 10:34 PM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
The "16610 T" engraving looks terrible and spacings deviate with every 16610LV shown on e.g. HQ Milton.
This LV: 16+610+T Original LV: 1+66+10+T |
7 August 2020, 03:22 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 855
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.