The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 August 2020, 03:22 AM   #1
JSolution
"TRF" Member
 
JSolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,398
No love for my 5 digits

Have a couple of 5 digits in my collection, amongst a lot of 6 digits. Finding it really hard to wear these now after having the newer bracelets. Anyone else experienced this?

I have worn this watch more than any other I own, but not recently. Im not into vintage (yes this is only about 15 years old) but it’s a huge jump in quality I feel, from the 5 to the 6 digit.

This one is on the chopping block.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JSolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:28 AM   #2
timlaw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Tim
Location: Worcestershire,UK
Watch: Coke 16710
Posts: 894
to each their own as personally i prefer 5 digit references presently

selling them is probably wise and wont be exactly hard to sell

but then again probably a safe place for your cash and you avoid possible sellers remorse

and that is a gorgeous watch
__________________
Tim.

124060 Submariner, 16710 Coke, 16570 Black dial, Datejust 41 Wimbledon dial, Tudor Black Bay GMT, Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue, Tudor Black Bay 58 925, Tudor Prince Date Chronograph (panda dial)
timlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:30 AM   #3
Spectre38
"TRF" Member
 
Spectre38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Paul
Location: Out West
Watch: and be amazed.
Posts: 1,552
I don't think you should have to subject yourself to such an antiquated piece... If you want to send it to me, I will properly dispose of it.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the
Global Association of Retro Grouch Curmudgeons
Spectre38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:35 AM   #4
Xenon
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,136
I'll take it and wear it and not complain

5 digit flat out looks better and that lightweight tuna can clasp is oh so comfy especially in solid 18k gold
Xenon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:37 AM   #5
C0d
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Kanata
Watch: Dog
Posts: 815
If you wanna let it go real bad and real low, I am game
C0d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:39 AM   #6
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,509
Many can’t go back to the 5 digit models mainly because of the bracelet and tuna can clasp.
Mystro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:43 AM   #7
ashullscachull
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Wilmington, Del.
Posts: 59
I went backwards. My second rolex was a 2019 Sub date. I liked it until I got a 5 digit Explorer II; then I realized just how much more comfortable the 5 digit was. Eventually I was wearing the Sub so rarely I sold it (for a nice profit) and bought a 5 digit GMT. Love that one too. Only thing I'd change is the clasps, but on balance the 5 digit feels better. FWIW, I've stuck to early 2000's SEL models trying to get as sturdy a 5 digit as possible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ashullscachull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:46 AM   #8
mykii
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: East
Watch: AP+FPJ+ PP+Rolex
Posts: 1,776
Yes. I agree. It’s almost impossible to go backwards from the 6 digits if you value Rolex’s tight tolerances and best-in-category bracelets.

People have nostalgia for the proportions, but are quick to forget the huge step-up in quality that the 6 digit models delivered.
__________________
mykii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:49 AM   #9
C0d
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Kanata
Watch: Dog
Posts: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykii View Post
Yes. I agree. It’s almost impossible to go backwards from the 6 digits if you value Rolex’s tight tolerances and best-in-category bracelets.

People have nostalgia for the proportions, but are quick to forget the huge step-up in quality that the 6 digit models delivered.
I could not have summarized it better. Once you hold/wear the new 6 digit models you simply cannot go back. The new bracelets are so much superior and while people knock the dials, they are simply more legible.
C0d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:49 AM   #10
Michaeli Paulo
"TRF" Member
 
Michaeli Paulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 357
"One man's trash is another man's treasure."
Michaeli Paulo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:51 AM   #11
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
It's the other way around for me. I prefer the 5 digits
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:54 AM   #12
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,084
I love the look and feel of 6 over 5 digits. That being said many feel the other way. You have 10k on your arm. Can you use that 10k for sometime you will enjoy more? If so sell it!
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:54 AM   #13
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenon View Post
I'll take it and wear it and not complain

5 digit flat out looks better and that lightweight tuna can clasp is oh so comfy especially in solid 18k gold
Does the OP watch look like solid gold? It is just TT, and those stamped clasps and hollow center links are a major step down from the modern technology. And I have owned both versions.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 03:57 AM   #14
911991
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: maryland
Watch: GMT II Evr, SUB
Posts: 657
once the watch is on my wrist it wears the same if not better, so does not bother me at all.
911991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:00 AM   #15
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
Wear both .No problem .Each has its own charm .
At the moment not wearing Rolex at all ...Jaeger leCoultre ,IWC and Panerai in rotation.
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:01 AM   #16
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
May I respectfully add, if Rolex thought the 5 digit Subs were so awesome they wouldn't have created the 6 digit versions. They seen many weak points and improved upon all of them.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:03 AM   #17
glamorama
"TRF" Member
 
glamorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
I have one 5-digit Rolex, the 16570 Explorer II, which I intend to keep 'forever'. But there is little comparison in build quality for sure. The main thing annoying me is that I would like to take one more link out from the bracelet and that is not possible without irreversible modification.
glamorama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:03 AM   #18
SDREW22
"TRF" Member
 
SDREW22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: CNY
Watch: TOG
Posts: 582
I also went from six to five.
SDREW22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:04 AM   #19
Pte6000
2024 Pledge Member
 
Pte6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NC
Watch: GMT & a Jubilee
Posts: 672
I don't mind the jubilee's but the oyster bracelets are not even comparable to me anymore.
Pte6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:05 AM   #20
minute_man
2024 Pledge Member
 
minute_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Basil
Location: Athens, GR
Watch: BoctokKomandirskie
Posts: 2,881
6 digits are much more substantial imho and a big step forward in terms of quality. I now prefer to admire 5 digit references from a distance.
minute_man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:05 AM   #21
JParm
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
JParm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NorCal
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 6,568
Room for all, in my opinion! 4-digit (which is what I consider the Snowflake), 5-digit, and the beasty 6-digit.

I love them all for their own little details.





__________________
JParm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:10 AM   #22
Heady Topper
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 321
6 digit for me. More bang for your buck

Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk
Heady Topper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:13 AM   #23
C0d
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Kanata
Watch: Dog
Posts: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamorama View Post
I have one 5-digit Rolex, the 16570 Explorer II, which I intend to keep 'forever'. But there is little comparison in build quality for sure. The main thing annoying me is that I would like to take one more link out from the bracelet and that is not possible without irreversible modification.
I recently saw on another forum, 16570 with new Oyster bracelet and thefore glidelock. I'd kill to have that combo.
C0d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:17 AM   #24
glamorama
"TRF" Member
 
glamorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by C0d View Post
I recently saw on another forum, 16570 with new Oyster bracelet and thefore glidelock. I'd kill to have that combo.
Does that fit out fo the box? Sounds comfortable, at least if it had the same bracelet as current Exp with a ez-link would be great.

Anyway I don't like to modify my Rolex watches so for me it will always be that issue with the 5.
glamorama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:21 AM   #25
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,754
Nope, 5 digit are still some of my favorite. The glide lock is infinitely more useful, but the stamped bracelet (to me) is more comfortable.
rushca01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:28 AM   #26
Xenon
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,136
Wow, 5 digit owners rent lots of free space inside the heads of some 6 digit owners
Xenon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:43 AM   #27
Sandpit
"TRF" Member
 
Sandpit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,808
I recently had the choice between a “like new” 16610 and the 6 digit equivalent. I know there are elements of the 6 digit which are better (bracelet) but it just wasn’t for me with my smaller wrists.

The 5 digit charm and slimmer case (both lugs and case depth) were a way way bigger draw to me.

I also just generally prefer a more vintage look (give me a Porsche 993 over a 992 every day of the week).

Each to their own though. Newer isn’t always better to everyone.
Sandpit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:47 AM   #28
eskiserkan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Bursa
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 493
6 digit is good watch, 5 is the better
eskiserkan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 04:52 AM   #29
3 Putt
"TRF" Member
 
3 Putt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Florida/China
Watch: All of them
Posts: 242
I have both. The six digit is great when I want a bit more heft on the wrist, such as when wearing tee shirts and shorts. I like the five digit with suit jackets and longer sleeve shirts. To me, the five digit are more comfortable on the wrist.

Room for both and I like them for what they are. Why does one thing always have to be better than another?
__________________
“If you drink, don’t drive. Don’t even putt.”
― Dean Martin
3 Putt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2020, 05:07 AM   #30
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
All 5d Rolexeses are junk.

Sell them. Sell them now.

Blue springs, micro swings and ceramic dreams are what it’s all about.

Flood the market with those junkers.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.