ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 September 2020, 12:54 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Maryland
Watch: 118209
Posts: 697
|
Why the Submariner should cost $980
This is very scientific--try to keep up. I've just been offered a Sea Dweller by my AD at (of course) msrp, which is $12,600. The watch is rated to 12,800 feet. That shakes out to roughly $0.98 per foot of water resistance. Thusly, apply the same logic to the Submariner, and you arrive at $980. I plan to suggest this pricing scheme to Rolex. Will keep you posted.
In all seriousness, as excited as I am to be offered any ss sports model (a first for me!), I think I'm going to decline this one and hold out for the 43mm or a Sub (any config) whichever comes first. This is too much watch for me---both physically and monetarily, not that the 43 is much less. Hopefully that also signals to the AD that I'm not just looking to flip something. Some other lucky buyer can harpoon this sea creature. I don't think they'll have any trouble moving it. |
24 September 2020, 02:17 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Speedmaster Pro
Posts: 670
|
In my experience, there is not much physical difference between the Deepsea and the 43mm Sea Dweller. Of the two, I would go with the Deepsea. Much cooler watch.
|
24 September 2020, 02:20 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,592
|
Funny mathematics here :-)
Talking about mathematics, The SD43 is way more than the sum of its parts.
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible. |
24 September 2020, 02:39 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: The Bush
Posts: 44
|
You could get a Panerai Luminor: 30m water resistance x 98 cents/foot = $96.
I might even get one at that price. Nah... |
24 September 2020, 02:44 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
|
Just found an invita for 95$ that you believe should be worth $980. Talk about value.
|
24 September 2020, 03:43 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Ahh hahar!
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
24 September 2020, 03:52 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Texas
Watch: SD43
Posts: 128
|
I disagree. The DSSD is leaps and bounds different as it relates to wearability. The DSSD is an absolute tuna can. Not many can pull it off. The SD43 is much more wearable. Think of it as a slightly beefed up Sub. The DSSD is the better watch IMHO, the thickness is massive though and is a non-starter
|
24 September 2020, 11:02 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: California/Malaga
Watch: GShock Frogman
Posts: 540
|
|
24 September 2020, 11:15 AM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Wade
Location: TN
Watch: 116619
Posts: 2,659
|
Quote:
Can't find a $10,000 sub in a store, imagine a $980 sub LOL. On the flip side, maybe the ADs would once again be full because it wouldn't have the "investment" following at a reasonable price. |
|
24 September 2020, 11:20 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: 126710BLRO
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
Watches are definitely reliant on personal taste, but relatively speaking the DSSD wears much differently than the SD43.
__________________
Find me on Instagram: MN_Watch_Fanatic Patek: 5168G (Blue) Rolex: 126710BLRO, 116515LN, 124060 |
|
24 September 2020, 01:40 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,907
|
I had the Sd43. Aesthetically its a beautiful watch but I found it top heavy and cumbersome on the wrist. I can’t imagine what the deepsea wears like, but I guess it wouldn’t be for me. I have a 7 3/4 wrist too.
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41 |
25 September 2020, 02:51 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 467
|
I had and wore a Deep Sea for 18 moths exclusively...
Ended up selling it and buying a 126600... Could not be happier... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.