ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 September 2020, 06:06 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: EU
Posts: 33
|
OP41 vs OP39
Hi guys,
Are there any direct comparisons (sizewise) of the new OP41 and the discontinued OP39? I was looking around, but can't seem to find any. The 39 was on the upper limit for me, and the 36 on the lower. Between the two, i preffered the 39. Now, with the thinner lugs on the 36, it seems the 36 wears even smaller, and if the 41 is really 41mm, that would be way to big for me. I tried the DJ41, and it was huge, but that may have been the effect of the flutted bezel. For reference, my wrist size is 6.9 inches. What do you guys think? Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk |
27 September 2020, 06:20 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 318
|
There are always other choices available besides the 2 variations. As the OP39 has ceased it's production then look at other similar case size e.g Explorer 1, Milgauss or AK at 40mm. Anyway my sub 7 inches wrist does fit GMT LN and BB therefore don't see much issue unless you preferred smaller case.
Sent from my HMA-L29 using Tapatalk |
27 September 2020, 06:54 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 6,642
|
Have a look at the Explorer 39mm, I’m loving mine and have 6.75 inch wrist.
|
27 September 2020, 09:25 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Martin
Location: Netherlands
Watch: The Rolex Way
Posts: 1,471
|
The actual case size of the DJ41 is around 39,5mm and if that is too big for you I assume the OP41 will be too big aswell.
__________________
114060 - 116520 - 126334 |
27 September 2020, 09:40 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: EU
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
If they went with the same DJ41 case, then there shouldn't be much of a difference compared to OP39. As i said, the OP39 is on the upper limit for me, but still comfortable. The DJ41 i think looks bigger because od the fluted bezel. I haven't seen the smooth bezel DJ41, that would probably be more comparable to the new OP Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk |
|
27 September 2020, 09:49 PM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
|
A 6.9" wrist is not a small wrist. I would say even slightly above average. You should easily be able to wear a 39.2 mm DJ41. Unless your wrist is very round I would think a 41 mm OP would work as well. I'm surprised you found the DJ to be too large but size is really just based on what YOU think looks good on you. In the end it's subjective.
If you like the look of the OP 41 I would suggest trying a smooth bezel baton DJ41 on oyster. That would get you close to the look of the OP with a smaller diameter and hey they even throw in a date window! Good luck. Do you have any wrist shot photos you could post? Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S20 using Tapatalk |
28 September 2020, 04:19 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: EU
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
So, this is the blue OP39 and the white grape OP36 |
|
28 September 2020, 09:15 PM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
|
I think both look fine on you. If you can do the OP39, which clearly you can, you should be good to go with a DJ41 since they are nearly identical in size. So I still would suggesting trying out a baton DJ41 smooth bezel on oyster. I really do think it would work well for you and it's a step up from an OP. I personally would prefer a date feature anyway. I had one watch without a date and it drove me crazy every time I'd look down for the date and realize yet again I don't have that.
|
28 September 2020, 09:57 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 473
|
|
28 September 2020, 10:06 PM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
There can be a big difference between what a watch looks like in a photo as opposed to being seen by the owner on the wrist. I've got a 6.5in wrist and the 36mm always looks small and dated to me but looks great in photos. Photos are one thing but living with it is another.
|
28 September 2020, 10:17 PM | #11 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NorCal
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 6,568
|
Quote:
I have a 6.5" wrist as well, and I will never own a 36mm watch. They just look incredibly small on my wrist, and I'm not a big dude. Pictures are worth a 1000 words, but real life is worth a million.
__________________
|
|
28 September 2020, 10:44 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,353
|
Quote:
I have tried both the 39mm and the (previous) 36mm Oyster Perpetuals and I can wear both. In fact it was taking me so long to decide, and when I finally did decide for the 39, it was August and I decided to just wait and see if they updated the white dial 39 with the new movement. NOPE! They killed it! Crushed! So now I am waiting from the AD for an Explorer and on the lookout for a white dial 39 if I can find one at a reasonable cost new. Oh and my wrist is slightly smaller than yours - 6.5-6.75". |
|
28 September 2020, 10:44 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Quote:
Wear one for a while and you shall have a different perception. Because if you wear a 40mm watch for a long time, anything under that size shall feel too small. I have not had the chance to try the OP36 but I own the old one. It wears bug due to the large/beefy lugs. Have a look on my IG account for reference.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
|
28 September 2020, 10:49 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: EU
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
I was also looking forward to the new movement and was ready to visit the dealer and order the 39 that same morning. When I saw the release in the morning, I was devastated... Also waiting for the explorer and new OP to hit the dealer so I can see it in person |
|
28 September 2020, 10:51 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,353
|
Just looked through the thread fully and saw your pics... The 36 looks fantastic on the further away shot. Would be nice to see the same perspective with the 39... Do you have one?
|
28 September 2020, 10:55 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: EU
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
The further away shots are much better than the wrist shots to get a perspective of the watch size. Especially with the way smartphone cameras handle the closeup shots. Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk |
|
28 September 2020, 11:47 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Argentina
Posts: 804
|
Quote:
|
|
28 September 2020, 11:59 PM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
I have to say - the 36 looks perfect on your wrist!
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
29 September 2020, 12:24 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: EU
Posts: 33
|
Thanks for all the kind words guys.
It will probably come down to the black or silver OP36 (once I see them in person). Over the years I have had a tendency of reducing the preferred watch size, so maybe the 36 is an investment in the future :) |
29 September 2020, 12:42 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: VSK
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex, Omega
Posts: 159
|
I think the 36 looks great on your wrist, OP. I have a flat 6.3" wrist and I went with the new OP36 in bright blue. I could pull off the 41 as the lugs fall within the width of my wrist with no overhang.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.