ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 November 2020, 05:48 PM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,646
|
Quote:
I’ve owned a BLNR and I own the new Kermit, personally I wouldn’t swap and pay extra. |
|
27 November 2020, 11:47 PM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
|
28 November 2020, 02:19 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 2,940
|
I would keep the GMT, and try to add the Submariner even if it takes a few years.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account. |
29 November 2020, 12:50 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
I would, absolutely. But then again, I think the BLRO and CHNR both are significantly better-looking, not to mention the new LV, IMO.
But it doesn't matter what I think, or for that matter, whoever else posts on this thread. What does matter is what YOU think. Whatever you do, don't ever-EVER- trade a watch that you love. Good luck, |
29 November 2020, 12:59 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,596
|
Not even talking money or value. Keep the BLNR and patiently wait to add the Sub. Unless you can move forward and not worry about looking back wishing you still had the BLNR.
|
29 November 2020, 01:09 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Scott
Location: Texas
Posts: 329
|
They are probably going to make the LV for another 10 years, just be patient. Don't give up the oyster BLNR.
__________________
SD43, VC 4520, 5130R, Pam00111, Speedy Tuesday 1. |
29 November 2020, 01:46 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: West Side
Posts: 2,719
|
Definitely not.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.