ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

escudoturbo · 18 April 2009, 01:18 AM

In my personal opinion i thonk any watch without a cyclops makes a better subject than one with, purely because of the distortion offered, i would also feel the oyster strap offers the best look close up, though croc leather is also nice.
Gold Daytonas on brown leather straps, sub no-dates ans Sea-dwellers would rank as my personal favorites.

housemad · 18 April 2009, 07:03 AM

So far the winners are: Submariners and Daytonas!

mfer · 18 April 2009, 07:34 AM

SS IIc I think....

valentine · 18 April 2009, 07:35 AM

sea dweller 4000 and i dont even own one!

kyle L · 18 April 2009, 07:38 AM

Explorer ftw.

rickyslam · 18 April 2009, 07:48 AM

One of these.

spogehead · 18 April 2009, 07:59 AM

GMT gets my vote.

Bisquitlips · 18 April 2009, 08:52 AM

Man!!!!!!!!!

After looking at your photos in this thread many times, I have to say that they are all luscious!

Rolex in itself is inherently photogenic! Regardless of the model.

Today I wore this one and enjoyed it many times though out my day.

Had to wipe the drool off of it several times!!!

asian1128 · 18 April 2009, 08:58 AM

Sub 16610

TheVTCGuy · 18 April 2009, 09:00 AM

Whichever one JJ is wearing!

SSD · 18 April 2009, 09:05 AM

JJ and both seem partial to this one, along with Blusey

whiskyguy · 18 April 2009, 09:14 AM

mic6 · 18 April 2009, 09:14 AM

this one for sure

daveathall · 18 April 2009, 09:17 AM

My Sea Dweller isnt shy when it comes to showing off.

migboy · 18 April 2009, 10:26 AM

this one...

presario · 18 April 2009, 12:03 PM

Great shots everyone! This is what it's all about. Some of the best collection of rolex shots ever!

I guess by asking which Rolex is the most photogenic, it's like asking which Victoria Secret model is the hottest. They're all hot!

Daveathall, some amazing shots! Are they for professional print ads? They sure look it.

JJ Irani · 18 April 2009, 12:13 PM

Any watch can or cannot be photogenic.

At the end of the day I guess it depends on the photographer .

Look at Jocke, for example.....he can make even the simplest of watches look good......yes, even a RADO!!

presario · 18 April 2009, 12:15 PM

A Rado? I don't believe it, JJ! But if anyone can, it's Jocke!

Rhodan · 18 April 2009, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Look at Jocke, for example.....he can make even the simplest of watches look good......yes, even a RADO!!

Who would have thought JJ could use Rado and look good in the same sentence?

Kirby · 18 April 2009, 01:05 PM

I'll put my vote in for whichever Rolex Jocke is taking pictures of. If I had to pick one, I'd say the Milgauss GV. Something about seeing the green ring around the dial just makes me want one every time I see a picture of it.

escudoturbo · 18 April 2009, 05:10 PM

I notice few people say they don't think the animal print Rolex's are photogenic, but I think they could be, even if they require a taste bypass to wear, though I think finding someone who admits to owning one would be the hardest part - unless you hang around with a rap group, but I do feel they could make a nice photo.

postiff · 18 April 2009, 05:28 PM

See for yourself

Thanks,

Danny

<>

DanP · 18 April 2009, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskyguy

yeah bro that what im talkin about!

acce1999 · 18 April 2009, 06:39 PM

I've been thinking about this for a couple of days. Of course the answer is personal. It goes to taste, and liking.

But, what I have observed (and this is my personal taste) is that I (for example) find the white dialled Explorer II much more photogenic than the black dialled. Photos of the black version do little for me, whilst seeing pictures of the white always makes me want to go and put mine on the wrist.

Similar with the GMT. The "current" 16710 is not remotely as nice on pictures as the older 1675. Can not explain why...

As I said. Very personal.

Best,

A

joeyk · 18 April 2009, 07:06 PM

Gmt iic x1

Rambam · 20 April 2009, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclevoy

IMHO, it is the clean, symmetrical dial of the 14060M

These are some of the best watch-pics that I have ever seen. Perfect lighting.

Pics from one of the members on WUS (used with permission)

Wow! That`s some amazing photography right there

Nakow · 20 April 2009, 03:58 AM

GMTII C is the most photogenic Rolex watch so far !

18 April 2009, 07:34 AM	#63
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	SS IIc I think.... __________________ member#3242

18 April 2009, 07:59 AM	#67
spogehead "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: London Posts: 339	GMT gets my vote. __________________ Cheers Ryan

18 April 2009, 08:52 AM	#68
Bisquitlips 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Richard Location: USA Watch: YM Deep Space Posts: 12,521	Man!!!!!!!!! After looking at your photos in this thread many times, I have to say that they are all luscious! Rolex in itself is inherently photogenic! Regardless of the model. Today I wore this one and enjoyed it many times though out my day. Had to wipe the drool off of it several times!!! __________________ Rolex Yacht-Master 40mm (SS-YG / Deep Space MOP) 16623 Breitling Aerospace Titanium / 18K with UTC. Omega Speedmaster 3510.50 Oris TT1 Pro Diver Regulator 43MM

18 April 2009, 09:05 AM	#71
SSD "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jamie Location: Georgia Watch: Stainless Sub Date Posts: 3,023	JJ and both seem partial to this one, along with Blusey Attached Images __________________ SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464

18 April 2009, 09:14 AM	#72
whiskyguy "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Kansas Posts: 666	Gvgvgvgvgvgvgv!!!!!

18 April 2009, 01:18 AM	#61
escudoturbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Baz Location: U.K Watch: Explorer II Posts: 364	In my personal opinion i thonk any watch without a cyclops makes a better subject than one with, purely because of the distortion offered, i would also feel the oyster strap offers the best look close up, though croc leather is also nice. Gold Daytonas on brown leather straps, sub no-dates ans Sea-dwellers would rank as my personal favorites.

18 April 2009, 07:03 AM	#62
housemad Banned Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: David Location: Montreal Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S Posts: 373	So far the winners are: Submariners and Daytonas!

18 April 2009, 07:35 AM	#64
valentine Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Justin Location: Baltimore, MD Watch: TT Diamond DJ Posts: 2,809	sea dweller 4000 and i dont even own one!

18 April 2009, 07:38 AM	#65
kyle L "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: USA Watch: Rolex Explorer I Posts: 10,278	Explorer ftw.

18 April 2009, 07:48 AM	#66
rickyslam "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Ricky Location: City of Sin Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ Posts: 1,152	One of these.

18 April 2009, 08:58 AM	#69
asian1128 Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: united states Watch: 16610 m series Posts: 60	Sub 16610

18 April 2009, 09:00 AM	#70
TheVTCGuy Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Paul Location: San Diego Watch: 126619LB Posts: 21,540	Whichever one JJ is wearing!

18 April 2009, 09:14 AM	#73
mic6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Europe Watch: 116718 green Posts: 1,944	this one for sure Attached Images __________________

18 April 2009, 09:17 AM	#74
daveathall "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Dave Location: England. Watch: Various Posts: 7,305	My Sea Dweller isnt shy when it comes to showing off. __________________ KINDEST REGARDS DAVE

18 April 2009, 10:26 AM	#75
migboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Chicago Watch: 16610 Posts: 300	this one...

18 April 2009, 12:03 PM	#76
presario "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Andrew Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,428	Great shots everyone! This is what it's all about. Some of the best collection of rolex shots ever! I guess by asking which Rolex is the most photogenic, it's like asking which Victoria Secret model is the hottest. They're all hot! Daveathall, some amazing shots! Are they for professional print ads? They sure look it. __________________

18 April 2009, 12:13 PM	#77
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Any watch can or cannot be photogenic. At the end of the day I guess it depends on the photographer . Look at Jocke, for example.....he can make even the simplest of watches look good......yes, even a RADO!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

18 April 2009, 12:15 PM	#78
presario "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Andrew Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,428	A Rado? I don't believe it, JJ! But if anyone can, it's Jocke! __________________

18 April 2009, 01:05 PM	#80
Kirby Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Adam Location: Chicago Posts: 104	I'll put my vote in for whichever Rolex Jocke is taking pictures of. If I had to pick one, I'd say the Milgauss GV. Something about seeing the green ring around the dial just makes me want one every time I see a picture of it.

18 April 2009, 05:10 PM	#81
escudoturbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Baz Location: U.K Watch: Explorer II Posts: 364	I notice few people say they don't think the animal print Rolex's are photogenic, but I think they could be, even if they require a taste bypass to wear, though I think finding someone who admits to owning one would be the hardest part - unless you hang around with a rap group, but I do feel they could make a nice photo.

18 April 2009, 05:28 PM	#82
postiff Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Danny Location: Ca Watch: 116710LN Posts: 936	The GMT is photogenic in a variety of places. See for yourself Thanks, Danny <>

18 April 2009, 06:39 PM	#84
acce1999 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: GMT+1 Posts: 2,711	I've been thinking about this for a couple of days. Of course the answer is personal. It goes to taste, and liking. But, what I have observed (and this is my personal taste) is that I (for example) find the white dialled Explorer II much more photogenic than the black dialled. Photos of the black version do little for me, whilst seeing pictures of the white always makes me want to go and put mine on the wrist. Similar with the GMT. The "current" 16710 is not remotely as nice on pictures as the older 1675. Can not explain why... As I said. Very personal. Best, A

18 April 2009, 07:06 PM	#85
joeyk "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: uk/earth Watch: GMT IIc Posts: 698	Gmt iic x1 Attached Images

20 April 2009, 03:58 AM	#87
Nakow "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Canada Watch: 16622 Posts: 536	GMTII C is the most photogenic Rolex watch so far ! __________________ 16622

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)