The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 January 2021, 12:51 PM   #31
vh2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
He must belong to TRF
His Deputy Secretary of Horological Affairs is clearly a long-time lurker. It was a blatant copy and paste from one of the gazillion “Do people notice your watch?” threads.
vh2k is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:52 PM   #32
sgwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
sgwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: KP Jimmy
Location: Singapore
Watch: R/AP/FPJ/Hermès/et
Posts: 6,597
NYT’s hard left turn to a publication for the apparatchiks was never more apparent.
__________________
sgwatchguy is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:52 PM   #33
eanzenberg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by indianmachine View Post
sheesh...as if it was a Rainbow Diamond Daytona
That would make me more impressed lol. But honestly, who cares? The piece said it’s worth $7000. Is that a lot of money to most people? I doubt it, considering so many spend money on things I wouldn’t care for. It’s $200 a month for 3 years, or about what a few meals and coffee cost these days.
eanzenberg is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:54 PM   #34
southcarolina1801
"TRF" Member
 
southcarolina1801's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Peach State
Posts: 735
What a ridiculous article. Biden is a watch guy, I’ve seen several different Omegas on his before too.
southcarolina1801 is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:56 PM   #35
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by eanzenberg View Post
That would make me more impressed lol. But honestly, who cares? The piece said it’s worth $7000. Is that a lot of money to most people? I doubt it, considering so many spend money on things I wouldn’t care for. It’s $200 a month for 3 years, or about what a few meals and coffee cost these days.
7 grand is a lot to people who’s work places have been shuttered for coming up on a year.......your in California you should be able to relate, it’s tone deaf

steve
dimag333 is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:56 PM   #36
vh2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by eanzenberg View Post
That would make me more impressed lol. But honestly, who cares? The piece said it’s worth $7000. Is that a lot of money to most people? I doubt it, considering so many spend money on things I wouldn’t care for. It’s $200 a month for 3 years, or about what a few meals and coffee cost these days.
Wow!! Jaded perspective! Completely out of touch.

A huge percentage of the population lives paycheck to paycheck and would never consider spending $2,000 (let alone $7,900) on a stainless steel wristwatch.
vh2k is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:57 PM   #37
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by eanzenberg View Post
That would make me more impressed lol. But honestly, who cares? The piece said it’s worth $7000. Is that a lot of money to most people? I doubt it, considering so many spend money on things I wouldn’t care for. It’s $200 a month for 3 years, or about what a few meals and coffee cost these days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vh2k View Post
Wow!! Jaded perspective! A huge percentage of the population lives paycheck to paycheck and would never consider spending $2,000 (let alone $7,900) on a stainless steel wristwatch.
Hey man; remember the chick with the double wide sub zeros, she had 7k in ice cream

steve
dimag333 is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:57 PM   #38
rolexonlywatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Ray
Location: US
Watch: DJ2 41mm Winbledon
Posts: 146
A dumb article written by an idiot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rolexonlywatch is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:58 PM   #39
RyanO
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ryan
Location: DMV
Watch: LVc
Posts: 2,131
I don’t have a subscription, but based on what I saw, truly shameful. The president elect hasn’t earned the right to wear a basic Rolex? Disgusting... Shame on you NYT.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RyanO is online now  
Old 23 January 2021, 12:58 PM   #40
Cabaiguan
"TRF" Member
 
Cabaiguan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Raf
Location: NJ
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 2,155
Surprised anyone reads this rag anymore.
__________________
"A ship of war is the best ambassador." - Oliver Cromwell
Cabaiguan is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:00 PM   #41
eanzenberg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by vh2k View Post
Wow!! Jaded perspective! Completely out of touch.

A huge percentage of the population lives paycheck to paycheck and would never consider spending $2,000 (let alone $7,900) on a stainless steel wristwatch.
That’s an interesting perspective. No one said whether people want to buy a $7k watch, but if they could if they wanted to. I stand by my observation, that it’s an attainable goal for most people here. If $7k is not attainable as a once-a-life extravagance in America then we are a poor country indeed.
eanzenberg is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:00 PM   #42
Bryan81
"TRF" Member
 
Bryan81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Watch: 126710BLRO
Posts: 606
Come on, man! Give me a break!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Bryan81 is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:04 PM   #43
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,183
Chilled out people or this thread will be closed soon!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:05 PM   #44
vh2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by eanzenberg View Post
That’s an interesting perspective. No one said whether people want to buy a $7k watch, but if they could if they wanted to. I stand by my observation, that it’s an attainable goal for most people here. If $7k is not attainable as a once-a-life extravagance in America then we are a poor country indeed.
Quite clueless observation. It’s like saying a $80,000 Porsche or $10,000 handbag is a reasonable once-in-a-lifetime extravagance for the average American.

Average citizens are worried about paying the rent, buying food, filling their prescriptions, and figuring out how to send their kids to college.
vh2k is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:07 PM   #45
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by eanzenberg View Post
That’s an interesting perspective. No one said whether people want to buy a $7k watch, but if they could if they wanted to. I stand by my observation, that it’s an attainable goal for most people here. If $7k is not attainable as a once-a-life extravagance in America then we are a poor country indeed.
Man....that’s the out of touch perspective people take issue with

steve
dimag333 is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:08 PM   #46
Ducky
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Muddy
Watch: ducks ina row
Posts: 142
A Rolex website search now shows the "Biden" along with Kermit, Batman, Pepsi and Hulk...
Ducky is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:13 PM   #47
vh2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducky View Post
A Rolex website search now shows the "Biden" along with Kermit, Batman, Pepsi and Hulk...
DavidSW is now offering $250 off select Rolex DateJust models.

Promo code “BIDEN”

vh2k is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:14 PM   #48
G.Montag
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by JodyHighroller View Post
Must not be anything else to write about. Simply a ridiculous article.
With Trump out of office, the IS nothing else to write about I mean, what do you expect from a garbage newspaper like the NYT.
G.Montag is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:16 PM   #49
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by vh2k View Post
DavidSW is now offering $250 off select Rolex DateJust models.



Promo code “BIDEN”








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:17 PM   #50
Lew Archer
"TRF" Member
 
Lew Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: L.A., Calif.
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 2,220
Well, we have seen articles on Bernie's mittens, so I guess Biden's watches were the next thing, since they've exhausted the topic of his Ray Ban Aviators.

He wore a watch appropriate to the occasion. Let's hope he performs as well during his time in office as his timepiece.

It would be a false front to deliberately wear a Timex when that's not his actual preference. He's certainly not living beyond his means, which might be of concern, from a security perspective. He obviously has a genuine interest in watches and his tastes run to classic brands, Rolex and Omega. He chooses watches constructed of stainless steel. They aren't flamboyant and neither is he.

I'll bet demand for Ray-Ban Aviators and Datejusts will increase...
Lew Archer is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:17 PM   #51
eanzenberg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by vh2k View Post
Quite clueless observation. It’s like saying a $80,000 Porsche or $10,000 handbag is a reasonable once-in-a-lifetime extravagance for the average American.

Average citizens are worried about paying the rent, buying food, filling their prescriptions, and figuring out how to send their kids to college.
This is not correct for the majority of Americans, but ok. You’re entitled to your opinion. The data doesn’t back it though. If anything, people have been saving lots more $ through covid.
eanzenberg is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:20 PM   #52
RyanJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mendota View Post
What a stupid article. Jealousy at its worst. Many presidents in the past have worn Rolex. Obama wore a custom made piece given to him by the secret service. Likely not as expensive as Biden's Rolex, but the fact that it was limited edition and so few pieces were made, plus only available to SS agents, that makes it pretty darned special.
They sold Obama's Secret Service watch at the Secret Service store. If you had a friend in the SS or worked in the building you could buy one from the store. However, as soon as the world knew Obama had one, the store sold out in an hour heh. I missed it by a day or two as I was headed over to get one. It was not expensive at all but super cool with the SS seal on the dial.

Gotta love the hype.
RyanJ is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:22 PM   #53
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by vh2k View Post
Quite clueless observation. It’s like saying a $80,000 Porsche or $10,000 handbag is a reasonable once-in-a-lifetime extravagance for the average American.

Average citizens are worried about paying the rent, buying food, filling their prescriptions, and figuring out how to send their kids to college.
Him wearing an Ironman wouldn't solve any of that. He's not an average citizen, he's the President.
zengineer is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:22 PM   #54
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by eanzenberg View Post
This is not correct for the majority of Americans, but ok. You’re entitled to your opinion. The data doesn’t back it though. If anything, people have been saving lots more $ through covid.
What world do you live in?

steve
dimag333 is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:24 PM   #55
moneymike83
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Brooklyn
Watch: Sd43
Posts: 684
Lol Thanks to this guy there will be no more dayjust in any ads now. We can only buy cellini’s only.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
moneymike83 is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:26 PM   #56
the dark knight
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,538
Weird talking politics here. But I will say that I think Biden knows exactly what he's doing. The man was a Senator forever and then VP for 8 years. He knows wearing a Rolex so prominently could cause some blowback like the article in OP. He could also have continued wearing the Omegas he has previously been seen with. Or gone with a Timex or whatever be more "of the people".

But a Rolex is a ROLEX. Basically to most people that don't know watches, it's the most expensive watch you can get.

The Democrats have gotten a lot of heat from the Republicans about being socialists and their desire to soak the rich. I'm not expressing any personal opinions or political views, that's just been the tone during the campaign.

I honestly think Biden is trying to send a message that if you are wealthy and successful and wear a Rolex, don't worry, I'm not a Socialist, I will be a President for you just as much as the guy that can't even afford a watch.
the dark knight is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:27 PM   #57
Ryann24
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 207
Why have we gotten to a place where we villianize hard work?
Ryann24 is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:27 PM   #58
vh2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by zengineer View Post
Him wearing an Ironman wouldn't solve any of that. He's not an average citizen, he's the President.
I was responding to:

Is that a lot of money to most people?

My unequivocal response is.... YES!
vh2k is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:28 PM   #59
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by eanzenberg View Post
That would make me more impressed lol. But honestly, who cares? The piece said it’s worth $7000. Is that a lot of money to most people? I doubt it, considering so many spend money on things I wouldn’t care for. It’s $200 a month for 3 years, or about what a few meals and coffee cost these days.

Stupid statement. Out of touch for sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GoingPlaces is offline  
Old 23 January 2021, 01:28 PM   #60
eanzenberg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimag333 View Post
What world do you live in?

steve
In America, in the real world. You?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/...ates-by-month/
eanzenberg is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.