ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 May 2009, 06:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
The 341 Egiziano, too big ??
Not for Mr. Sylvester Stallone
And this is NOT a photoshop job like the post below with Barack Obama photo's from 'Kiril'
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
23 May 2009, 08:50 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Houston
Watch: BP FF Bathyscaphe
Posts: 116
|
wow, I could never pull that off
|
23 May 2009, 09:12 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
The dude has a ring on that's half the size of the watch. Maybe that's what makes it look right.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
23 May 2009, 10:25 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
|
It fits him nicely. I don't think I can pull it off and I'm a big guy.
|
23 May 2009, 11:34 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Look so perfect in his wrist IMO.
I like this model, but difenetely not the price... |
23 May 2009, 12:17 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
The watch is right,but the ring is ..... shall we say,a bit too much ?? >> The ring just screams Adrien ... !!!!! to me !!!
|
23 May 2009, 01:26 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
|
23 May 2009, 03:27 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
|
That was funny....
Is that a second PAM on the other wrist or a bracelet? The guy is a stud.
__________________
Jackson |
23 May 2009, 03:54 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Siberia,yes it is
Posts: 640
|
Right i,m off to the gym... and get some Roids.....
|
23 May 2009, 08:50 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South of Equator
Posts: 278
|
Gee.. sometimes I wish I had his wrists! I thought 60mm was well, bit too big. If Panerai made 44mm versions then I'll be all over it!
|
23 May 2009, 11:27 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
He does use growth hormone & that thickens the bones, so that might have helped...
Quote:
I do think Panerai have missed a trick by not producing a 47mm version, but wonder how the purists would react... So now Sly's up to 60mm what size will Arnold go to...? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuObWcWNkyI
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
|
24 May 2009, 01:12 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Watch: ya mawt!
Posts: 3,448
|
On the first photo, He's wearing 2 Pam's.
|
24 May 2009, 01:18 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: LONDON
Watch: SDDS
Posts: 660
|
Big is beautiful
|
24 May 2009, 01:31 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
|
24 May 2009, 02:23 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Lewis
Location: Earth
Watch: The Beast
Posts: 1,352
|
Definetly too BIG for me...
__________________
" I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO |
24 May 2009, 04:32 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
|
24 May 2009, 04:41 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
25 May 2009, 12:13 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Just saw this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHjw7B0noAk If you pause it at 1.09, you get a good view. Too big for Sly IMO. Just out of curiosity, is anyone buying the 341 to wear, or do you think it will just go to collectors & flippers?
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
25 May 2009, 12:23 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Just collectors and flippers, you'll have quite a few paneristi who collect all this style of panerais, so they'll buy it, stick it in a case or vault and only ever take pictures of it. It's pretty much the same for all the old panerai's, not a lot of them ever get worn, just pictured. Personally i think the 341 is a bit of a stupid watch to release onto the public market, it was designed to go on a diver, over his dive suit, meaning it had to be quite large, but for normal people it's just silly, hell it's even silly for divers now as times have moved on and nobody is wearing the dive kit that was around in the 50s!
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
|
25 May 2009, 02:39 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South of Equator
Posts: 278
|
|
25 May 2009, 02:53 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
Quote:
|
|
25 May 2009, 02:58 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
It's a special edition that should be available for any AD or boutique to put their name down for, so anyone can join a list. I still think it's a silly release as it's an unwearable watch that was created to be used in conjunction with diving gear. As for buying one, i'd look at nearly every other watch before the 341, it's just too daft to put money on, other than to stick in a vault for a future investment, which i hate seeing in watches, they're meant to be worn, not hidden away and left to gather dust
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
|
25 May 2009, 03:14 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 187
|
It's interesting but the reality is that for common everyday use, it looks absurd. If it were smaller, say 44mm, it would certainly have more mass appeal but at that size it just looks silly. This is just my opinion of course...
|
27 May 2009, 08:38 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Siberia,yes it is
Posts: 640
|
hmm
i have to agree with Chris here due to it being so limited its not a watch for the masses as it is, and if the 60mm is to big don’t get one ... There are still people who do like these and would like to own one.
if they like to stick it in a safe, and enjoy it that way to picture or to show at a GTG, as long as they enjoy them I don’t see any probs with that. It’s a re-issue for what ever it was used, and some people just enjoy the historic re-makes , look at the old compasses nobody uses them but they value these to have in the collection. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.