ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 November 2022, 02:33 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Minneapolis
Watch: Explorer 114270
Posts: 5
|
Rolex vs Tudor Bracelet
Hi all,
Just trying to get some opinions - I just recently bought an Explorer 1 114270 from 2007, and the bracelet feels really flimsy compared to my Tudor BB58. I'm new to the world of Rolex and am wondering if this is normal for an older watch. I'm not too worried about legitimacy (bought from a dealer, with papers and box, etc.) but just curious. What are peoples' thoughts? Thanks! |
17 November 2022, 02:37 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
I have the same watch, and, having owned generations from the early 70s all the way to modern, it’s my favorite bracelet of all. Solid end links, but hollow center links to remain lightweight, and a super compact and lightweight clasp with a lock and 5 adjustment holes. Don’t mistake weight for durability.
|
17 November 2022, 02:40 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Austin
Watch: 6 digit Rolex+APRO
Posts: 1,561
|
I feel you, most people on here will tell you the older bracelets are just fine but every Rolex with that bracelet underwhelmed me. The BB58 is much more solid and robust. But give it time, if it’s properly sized, it should feel fine.
|
17 November 2022, 03:34 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: canada
Watch: Daytona 116500
Posts: 471
|
Yes on the older rolex watches, modern rolex has the new very solid link bracelets. Huge difference.
|
17 November 2022, 08:16 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Tronno
Posts: 407
|
Does the modern Tudor BB “Oyster” bracelets use ceramic sleeves too?
|
17 November 2022, 11:03 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London
Watch: 114060LB
Posts: 3,986
|
|
17 November 2022, 11:10 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Wayne
Location: NC
Watch: 226570
Posts: 3,484
|
Huh? uh........?
__________________
In the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years. - Abraham Lincoln __________________________________________________ Rolex 226570, Explorer II Club |
18 November 2022, 01:05 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,657
|
|
18 November 2022, 01:16 AM | #9 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,346
|
Quote:
I too love the 78790. Amazing bracelet. OP might have stretch. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
18 November 2022, 01:17 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,346
|
|
18 November 2022, 01:28 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Ultimately, the 114270 is the last Explorer in the category I’ve seen others call “neo-vintage.” Many of us prefer this era and older, but, if you want a heavier, more solid bracelet (and, IMO, less comfortable,) you need to get the 39mm Exp or the current 36mm model.
|
18 November 2022, 02:42 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
I’m a stable rich genius but this thread is confusing.
|
18 November 2022, 02:43 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: US
Watch: 124270
Posts: 56
|
I can vouch for the new 36mm bracelet. It’s a little different in proportion (19mm lug tapering to 14mm) but it works. Why should a 36mm time only watch have the same bracelet dimensions as a 40mm dive watch anyway?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 November 2022, 04:16 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
The "bulgier" proportions of the newer models look more like the proportions of any other modern watch. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.