The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 January 2023, 08:32 AM   #1
Vivo Libre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20
“New” Rolex Sub has lug scratches - warranty issue?

Rolex Forums Users - happy new year everyone.

On Saturday I went to my watch dealer who sold me my Omega and is a reputable dealer in my city. I purchased a 2022 Submariner for $16K. When I asked if the watch was worn, he told me it was “new” and “unworn”.

I tried to inspect the watch while I was there, but haven’t given it a wear until today in which I noticed dings on the front of the lugs - on both the top and bottom connectors - which make me think the watch had a bracelet removal.

My coworker who owns a Sub agrees someone has changed the bracelet at least once. I flipped the watch and as you can see, the inside of the lugs are very scratched up. This tells me two things very clearly:

1. The watch has had its bracelet removed/replaced by a prior owner.
2. The watch could not be described as either “new”, nor “unworn”.

In particular, I’m concerned with the warranty as I know the warranty card says any third party attachments or accessories void the warranty. I bought this 2022 watch because of the warranty - not to mention me paying $16K for a Sub because it is new.

What do you guys think and how would you handle this situation?

(I tried to share links to pictures of my watches but I can’t until I have 10 posts…)
Vivo Libre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 08:51 AM   #2
DadsSub
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 157
You paid a premium for a new "unworn" watch. That's what you should have gotten. I did the same for my SD43 and there wasn't the hint of a scratch on it. Plus it had everything - tags, bezel protector etc etc. Did yours come with every original bit of kit?

It won't hurt your warranty because changing bands is not a big issue. You're good there.

But you need to have a talk with your dealer. Either get some money back or take the watch back at that price.
DadsSub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 08:57 AM   #3
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
There are legitimate reasons to change the bracelet and while using OEM parts. Though if you purchased from a reseller, then it is technically a used/pre-owned watch. The new or unworn condition is just a statement of the condition by the seller, not really saying you are getting a "new" watch that has came direct from the AD. You should take it up with the reseller that you purchased it from for them perhaps misrepresenting the condition.

I'm guessing what happened was the watch was handled harshly at an AD or something strange and similar, then the reseller somehow came into contact with a deal and switched the bracelet to one in better condition, while sending the original someplace to refinish and sell as a separate item. Lots of resellers have bracelets for sale and would be easy to take one from inventory and install on the watch while the original is refinished.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 08:58 AM   #4
dtwer
"TRF" Member
 
dtwer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: midwest
Watch: DJ 41
Posts: 1,507
In this case, may want to double check and see if the bracelet is still genuine instead of MIC...
dtwer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 08:58 AM   #5
Auric Goldfinger
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Genève / US
Posts: 364
Bracelet removal is something that wouldn't invalidate your warranty.

I would certainly go back to that secondary dealer and have a chat about the pre-existing damage. If it it was me, I'd press for a refund and look elsewhere. Subs are plentiful on the secondary market.
Auric Goldfinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 08:59 AM   #6
drrd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Real Name: rd
Location: uk
Posts: 1,552
OP, hurry up and get your ten posts because there’s not much to say without pictures.
drrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 09:01 AM   #7
Mobokid
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mobokid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Evans, GA
Posts: 267
That sucks.. hopefully you can sort it out with your dealer


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mobokid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 09:04 AM   #8
EEpro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
EEpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,243
It doesn't matter pics or not. Take it back and get your money. It's a pre owned watch
__________________
Ω
2FA Active
EEpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 09:04 AM   #9
omar-rye
"TRF" Member
 
omar-rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivo Libre View Post
1. The watch has had its bracelet removed/replaced by a prior owner.
The bracelet could have been removed during inspection/authentication, when the dealer purchased it

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivo Libre View Post
2. The watch could not be described as either “new”, nor “unworn”.
It could still be new and unworn but with a cosmetic defect

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivo Libre View Post
In particular, I’m concerned with the warranty as I know the warranty card says any third party attachments or accessories void the warranty. I bought this 2022 watch because of the warranty - not to mention me paying $16K for a Sub because it is new.
There’s not an issue with any future warranty claims from what you described, unless what you are saying is the bracelet has been removed and replaced with a non genuine one
omar-rye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 09:25 AM   #10
Tim Plains
"TRF" Member
 
Tim Plains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: EST
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 1,175
Your warranty would be void if Rolex could prove someone not authorized to work on their watches opened the caseback but anyone can remove a bracelet without issue.
Tim Plains is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 09:34 AM   #11
Bxtek
"TRF" Member
 
Bxtek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 2,636
Basically, the watch was sold to you as new and is supposed to be in perfect condition. You paid a premium for one that condition, but is obviously not. I would take it back, get a full refund and keep shopping. Even if they tried to give you a little off of the price on that one to keep it, I'd pass.
Bxtek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 09:36 AM   #12
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,683
Your watch is not as described. You should return it for a full refund. It sounds like the bracelet has been taken off and put back inexpertly. That won't void the warranty, it just damages the lugs.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 09:37 AM   #13
GGGMT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by EEpro View Post
It doesn't matter pics or not. Take it back and get your money. It's a pre owned watch

This. Not a warranty issue. You got rooked


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 09:42 AM   #14
Gab27
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
I would return it, personally. You paid a huge premium for a product that was misrepresented. Further, you could likely get the same watch from one of the trusted sellers on this forum for substantially less.
Gab27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:22 AM   #15
Vivo Libre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20
The jury is definitely out. Circling back here to post the pictures I mentioned.

In the first two pics, take a look at the dents on the front side of the lugs. Then in the third picture is the top-front.

In the 4th/5th pictures, you can see all the scratches by the pins. My coworker looked at it and immediately let me know someone has clearly replaced the bracelet (and done a poor job).


https://imgur.com/a/cfn6NAB
Vivo Libre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:26 AM   #16
Auric Goldfinger
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Genève / US
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivo Libre View Post
The jury is definitely out. Circling back here to post the pictures I mentioned.

In the first two pics, take a look at the dents on the front side of the lugs. Then in the third picture is the top-front.

In the 4th/5th pictures, you can see all the scratches by the pins. My coworker looked at it and immediately let me know someone has clearly replaced the bracelet (and done a poor job).


https://imgur.com/a/cfn6NAB
Return it for a full refund.

That thing is butchered for a watch that was advertised “unworn”.
Auric Goldfinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:27 AM   #17
HERITAGE82
"TRF" Member
 
HERITAGE82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by omar-rye View Post
The bracelet could have been removed during inspection/authentication, when the dealer purchased it

It could still be new and unworn but with a cosmetic defect

There’s not an issue with any future warranty claims from what you described, unless what you are saying is the bracelet has been removed and replaced with a non genuine one
All of this is most likely what happened. Dealer removed the bracelet to inspect and botched it big time. More common than you think. A refund is in order.
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270
- Tudor Black Bay - 79230B
- Tudor Chronograph - 79270P
- Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv.
- Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype
HERITAGE82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:29 AM   #18
LateLearner
"TRF" Member
 
LateLearner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: USA
Watch: 5513, 16750, AK
Posts: 280
Some of us are dinosaurs/Boomers, and don’t open links.

But I agree with those suggesting a return for full refund.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LateLearner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:31 AM   #19
Gab27
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivo Libre View Post
The jury is definitely out. Circling back here to post the pictures I mentioned.

In the first two pics, take a look at the dents on the front side of the lugs. Then in the third picture is the top-front.

In the 4th/5th pictures, you can see all the scratches by the pins. My coworker looked at it and immediately let me know someone has clearly replaced the bracelet (and done a poor job).


https://imgur.com/a/cfn6NAB
That is unquestionably a used watch.

I have nothing against used watches...I bought my Submariner used. However, the pricing very much reflected this.

As you were sold a 'new' watch and the agreement was for a new watch, IMO either, A) you should get a substantial partial refund that reflects you having purchased a used item, or B) you get a full refund and return the watch.

There are highly reputable sellers on this forum who will sell you a new Rolex, and likely for thousands less than you paid.
Gab27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:38 AM   #20
Deepseadog
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Stowe, Vermont
Watch: 126660 279160
Posts: 301
What's the name of the dealer that sold you this "new" watch?
Deepseadog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:44 AM   #21
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,515
That is not a “new” watch. In fact those kinds of marks are the kind of marks that never should occur and would never occur in a life time of normal use. Those are marks done by someone that is not skilled and makes me wonder what else they tampered with. I personally would have passed on that watch even if it was marked “used”. Certain marks or scratches can be explained by clumsy handling. The marks being show in this particular watch is not those kinds of marks and are warning flags of someone tinkering around without skill or proper tools. That bothers me even if I were looking for a pre owned watch.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:45 AM   #22
Vivo Libre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deepseadog View Post
What's the name of the dealer that sold you this "new" watch?
Unless there are issues with my dealer refunding my watch tomorrow, I won’t publish an exposé. He is NOT a Rolex AD but he is an Omega AD, hence the start of my relationship with him. He’s a large, reputable dealer from one of the largest cities in the United States.
Vivo Libre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 10:59 AM   #23
Trailboss516
"TRF" Member
 
Trailboss516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: In denial
Watch: It's complicated
Posts: 1,620
Playing devil's advocate, you've had the watch since Saturday until now...5 days. How do you prove it was them, and not you during this period? Your request would hold more water if it was a few hours later.
Not saying you are S.O.L., but I could imagine a scenario where the dealer pushes back on this.
Good luck
Trailboss516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 11:20 AM   #24
Vivo Libre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailboss516 View Post
Playing devil's advocate, you've had the watch since Saturday until now...5 days. How do you prove it was them, and not you during this period? Your request would hold more water if it was a few hours later.
Not saying you are S.O.L., but I could imagine a scenario where the dealer pushes back on this.
Good luck
For sure - definitely something giving me anxiety right now. I noticed the little dents on the lugs shortly after but assumed it was just a factory defect. Then today I noticed the dents on the top lugs, so I now had my doubts of coincidence. Then my buddy and I compared watches then took a close look and saw it all.

In any case - I don’t have any other bracelets/straps - so I have absolutely zero reason to start messing around at the pins.

As Mystro said above, these “marks are the kind of marks that never should occur and would never occur in a life time of normal use”. It’s something I’m glad I noticed in the first place, because the outside of the bracelet is in good shape. My buddy has been wearing his sub for a year and the case-side lugs are pristine.
Vivo Libre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 11:34 AM   #25
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,257
Pics?
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 11:43 AM   #26
Vivo Libre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebel View Post
Pics?
https://imgur.com/a/cfn6NAB
Vivo Libre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 11:47 AM   #27
Geckobros
"TRF" Member
 
Geckobros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Arrakis
Posts: 874
Definitely a rookie removed the bracelet. You can see where they let the spring bars pop out towards the front of the watch, leaving gouges in the metal. Not to mention, they did not mask off the area. Get a refund.
Geckobros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 11:49 AM   #28
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivo Libre View Post
That looks like the result of several changes, or maybe one really bad one, done by someone who doesn't know how to do it right, or who had a few drinks beforehand. Or both.
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 11:52 AM   #29
seabreeze60
"TRF" Member
 
seabreeze60's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: Tudor, Carl F. Buc
Posts: 1,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivo Libre View Post
Rolex Forums Users - happy new year everyone.

On Saturday I went to my watch dealer who sold me my Omega and is a reputable dealer in my city. I purchased a 2022 Submariner for $16K. When I asked if the watch was worn, he told me it was “new” and “unworn”.

I tried to inspect the watch while I was there, but haven’t given it a wear until today in which I noticed dings on the front of the lugs - on both the top and bottom connectors - which make me think the watch had a bracelet removal.

My coworker who owns a Sub agrees someone has changed the bracelet at least once. I flipped the watch and as you can see, the inside of the lugs are very scratched up. This tells me two things very clearly:

1. The watch has had its bracelet removed/replaced by a prior owner.
2. The watch could not be described as either “new”, nor “unworn”.

In particular, I’m concerned with the warranty as I know the warranty card says any third party attachments or accessories void the warranty. I bought this 2022 watch because of the warranty - not to mention me paying $16K for a Sub because it is new.

What do you guys think and how would you handle this situation?

(I tried to share links to pictures of my watches but I can’t until I have 10 posts…)

Get your money back!
seabreeze60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2023, 11:57 AM   #30
omar-rye
"TRF" Member
 
omar-rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivo Libre View Post
Yikes! That doesn’t look good at all. Hopefully they’ll make it right with a refund. Did you take a wrist shot when you were still at the AD that can hopefully show the damage?

Worst case scenario, RSC could fix this for approximately $200 so don’t fret
omar-rye is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.