The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 April 2023, 11:31 AM   #31
PaulMiami
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
I think we get the gist of how the printing looks from your photos. Not like the original when magnified, but I'm sure it looks fine on the wrist.
Seems a stretch to make such a comment with such confidence since you’ve neither seen it on my wrist or under magnification. Either way, I’m enjoying it.
PaulMiami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2023, 12:11 PM   #32
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulMiami View Post
Seems a stretch to make such a comment with such confidence since you’ve neither seen it on my wrist or under magnification. Either way, I’m enjoying it.
I'm just judging by the high resolution photos that you posted for us to look at, which is all that I can do. Unlike others, I'm not comfortable assuming that the dial is perfect and every apparent flaw must necessarily be due to image artifacts. I go by what I see. Feel free to post better photos if you feel they are not representative. Or not ... nobody is forcing you to post photos of your watch on a collectors forum.

In any case, I'm happy that you're enjoying it.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2023, 07:10 PM   #33
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by one80 View Post
Assuming it is the same gentleman in London (and I’m confident it is), this is an example of his work showing the gilt relief.
Not the same watch/dial as OP.


Can you tell us who the man in London is?

He does appear to do good work.
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 12:39 AM   #34
RFC
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Puerto Rico
Watch: 1968 5513 Sub
Posts: 450
OP started this thread informing that his family’s heirloom was refinished or restored by a reputable watchmaker. He didn’t ask for opinions before or after going ahead with the project. What’s more the OP is happy with the results and that’s important to him.
RFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 01:14 AM   #35
HERITAGE82
"TRF" Member
 
HERITAGE82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,438
Amazing looking watch and I love that you were able to get it back to its old glory!

Rik is great to work with.
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270
- Tudor Black Bay - 79230B
- Tudor Chronograph - 79270P
- Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv.
- Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype
HERITAGE82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 01:22 AM   #36
TuRo
"TRF" Member
 
TuRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
I'm just judging by the high resolution photos that you posted for us to look at, which is all that I can do. Unlike others, I'm not comfortable assuming that the dial is perfect and every apparent flaw must necessarily be due to image artifacts. I go by what I see. Feel free to post better photos if you feel they are not representative. Or not ... nobody is forcing you to post photos of your watch on a collectors forum.

In any case, I'm happy that you're enjoying it.
I'm happy the OP is happy too.

The thing is though, there is in my opinion inconsistencies on this Rolex/Tudor forum to anything not 'original' and that's a shame imho.

I've just gone back and looked at the quite a few old posts, and when someone has put up say a piece, with whatever term you want to use a 'non-original' or 'artisan produced' or 'aftermarket' eg a GMT/sub insert, relumed dial or handset, a/m end links or a bracelet, or a non Rolex plexi (though tru-dome seem to get a pass by many oddly !!) etc etc.....most here would say of those items, 'that's not authentic Rolex sir, recommend you get it swapped out.' etc etc...and such was the disdain one chap was lambasted for displaying his GMT that was sporting a non-rolex insert!!

I just think this falls into somewhat the same category that's all, and in fact the font/detail/spacings that I can make out, I have seen better versions in Philipp Stahls RPR old piece on fake/aftermarket dials imho, costing a couple £100 or so.

But if someone wants to spend £0,000's on a replica painted dial that's fine and dandy (I guess the dial plate is at least heirloom so I can see that angle), but I think it's not unfriendly to say that some of us think its a unusual and costly route, and we wouldn't countenance it ourselves or recommend it to others.
__________________
Thieves and fools and long travelled soldiers, A candid light exposes their homes. Human falter, people bellowed from their homes. And houses, there's fools and long reigning pharaohs.

IT BITES - Yellow Christian
TuRo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 05:51 AM   #37
PaulMiami
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuRo View Post
I'm happy the OP is happy too.

The thing is though, there is in my opinion inconsistencies on this Rolex/Tudor forum to anything not 'original' and that's a shame imho.

I've just gone back and looked at the quite a few old posts, and when someone has put up say a piece, with whatever term you want to use a 'non-original' or 'artisan produced' or 'aftermarket' eg a GMT/sub insert, relumed dial or handset, a/m end links or a bracelet, or a non Rolex plexi (though tru-dome seem to get a pass by many oddly !!) etc etc.....most here would say of those items, 'that's not authentic Rolex sir, recommend you get it swapped out.' etc etc...and such was the disdain one chap was lambasted for displaying his GMT that was sporting a non-rolex insert!!

I just think this falls into somewhat the same category that's all, and in fact the font/detail/spacings that I can make out, I have seen better versions in Philipp Stahls RPR old piece on fake/aftermarket dials imho, costing a couple £100 or so.

But if someone wants to spend £0,000's on a replica painted dial that's fine and dandy (I guess the dial plate is at least heirloom so I can see that angle), but I think it's not unfriendly to say that some of us think its a unusual and costly route, and we wouldn't countenance it ourselves or recommend it to others.
I have a hard time understanding Dan S's and TuRo's posts above. For starters, I just wanted to alert others of the great work Rik is capable of, detailing your watch and band, overhauling the mechanism, and even refinishing a dial, if that's what's needed/desired. I wasn't asking for anyone to approve or endorse his work.

But what strikes me as odd is how biased and dismissive some folks are of any work done on a dial. I could understand if I was trying to defraud someone representing that my watch had a pristine original dial, or even worse, if I put a 3-6-9 dial or 5512 dial on a regular 5513, or a gilt dial on a 5513 that came with a matte dial. But this is not the case.

It's just my opinion, but these are just watches, not grandmaster paintings. There are very few gilts because not that many were made (a good thing) AND also because the dials simply didn't hold up (not such a good thing). Let's face it, they weren't that well made or else there wouldn't have been so many gilts that needed service dials even within 5-10 years of them being made. If these were cars, in today's world, they would have been recalled.

Also, it's funny how quick these posters are to be critical of the work done on my dial when all they have is a rather poor (certainly not high resolution) photo. Assuming One80 is right (I think he is), he posted a magnified photo of the work by the London dial refinisher. I don't know how to take such a photo with my iPhone, but the lettering on my dial is very much like this when you examine it in person with a magnifying glass. The gold you see is not painted on; it's the brass shining through the black glossy paint with a clear coat on top. I don't know anyone that can do this for a couple hundred bucks. And the spacing, details, etc are all superb, even though in the photo they look sloppy.

You can criticize whether the financial decision of refinishing a dial is wise or not. Given how unpopular redials are, it's probably financially very unwise to do so. But its very unfair to be critical of the work this guy does without ever really seeing it.
PaulMiami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 08:46 AM   #38
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
You had a matte service dial that was shot, so I probably would have done the same thing, and had the dial refinished as best as possible in a style that is appropriate for the model and age of the watch.

Nice to see a family heirloom ready for the years ahead. Congrats.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 10:05 AM   #39
SAAS
"TRF" Member
 
SAAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 548
Congrats on finding Rik and getting the watch to a point where it can be enjoyed by you and future generations
SAAS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 10:33 AM   #40
PaulMiami
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 64
I felt it was important to defend this guy’s work, although as I understand, he’s got quite the backlog.

There are probably very few craftsmen that can do this work, most I would think are close to retiring. It’s a shame their work is shunned on this forum. Only way I see broader acceptance is if Rolex offered the service themselves as part of their luxury vintage watch service.

This is why Patek is Patek as they take full responsibility to restore every watch they made since 1839. They have records of everything they made and they will make whatever parts they need.

https://www.patek.com/en/retail-serv...es/restoration

Vacheron goes back to 1755, btw.
PaulMiami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 11:55 AM   #41
MrChamfers
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA!!
Watch: ing Warriors ball
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulMiami View Post
I felt it was important to defend this guy’s work, although as I understand, he’s got quite the backlog.

There are probably very few craftsmen that can do this work, most I would think are close to retiring. It’s a shame their work is shunned on this forum. Only way I see broader acceptance is if Rolex offered the service themselves as part of their luxury vintage watch service.

This is why Patek is Patek as they take full responsibility to restore every watch they made since 1839. They have records of everything they made and they will make whatever parts they need.

https://www.patek.com/en/retail-serv...es/restoration

Vacheron goes back to 1755, btw.
There are quite a few "Collectors" on the forum. A lot of them have strong disdain for any dial work, including reluming of hour plots.
So watches in original, good condition command a premium.

However, from what I've read, many collectors bought their pristine examples before prices for watches and dials rose dramatically. So they don't really need to deal with the difficulty of restoring a damaged dial or paying through the nose for replacements.
MrChamfers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 06:26 PM   #42
one80
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 71
I think what PaulMiami has done with his watch is commendable, and I completely get where he's coming from.

There are many reasons that people would want (or need) a refinished dial - from having something that's period correct, to replacing something that's worn beyond use, or simply just wanting a different dial completely. All valid reasons.

There are people who swap their bezels to aftermarket for similar reasons too, or for a different/unique look, and I'm fine with this also.

Same goes for laser welding and refinishing. I often can't understand why people are against a craftsman restoring a watch to it's original condition.

Where I draw the line, is where a watch is represented as something that it's not, particularly for sale - e.g. a refinished and laser welded item being sold as NOS etc.
And PaulMiami has been completely open and transparent with his watch, so certainly does not fit in the above category.

It really is a lovely timepiece - wear in good health, and enjoy the work that has been put into it.
one80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 08:59 PM   #43
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
Congratulations to the OP for having restored his heirloom and to the watchmaker for the craftsmanship.
Personally, would I ever buy a watch refurbished by Rick, or Patek or Vacheron for that matter? Absolutely no!
Would I have done the restoration if the watch belonged to my grandfather?
Honestly I don’t know, I would have to see the condition of the dial before responding to this question.
Obviously nothing against the OP that genuinely promote this kind of intervention, but in a section of the RF where expert collector have been studying and discussing originality for years, I think is normal to see different opinions.
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2023, 11:25 PM   #44
PaulMiami
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 64
Not everyone on this forum is a collector. Many of us are folks just like me; someone that now has a family heirloom they inherited or somehow came across. Often these watches are in disrepair and their new owner is asking for advice.

Almost always the advice is essentially to service the mechanism, maybe replace the crystal, don’t polish it, maybe refurbish the band if it’s original, but if not, put it on a NATO band.

This is fine and perhaps it’s the best advice for collectors, particularly those looking to maximize the value of the watch, net of repair costs. But this is not helpful if you have a watch that looks horrible, not at all like how it left the factory, and needs some intensive TLC.

Some of us may have an attachment to the watch that is personal and is coming from a different place than a collector. A collector is often looking at many watches and deciding which ones to acquire based on various criteria. But those of us that suddenly have a family heirloom don’t have this choice. The choice we have is what do I do with this one watch.

It’s very difficult to find information on the forum if your goal is to get this one watch back to its original glory, while also respecting its age. And there are lots of scammers out there selling horrible replacement parts, some at absurd prices.

My goal with this post has been to help folks that find themselves in a similar position, giving them an option that may be better than having a really bad looking watch, putting in a service dial that has little resemblance to what the watch came with, or playing Russian roulette with dials on eBay.
PaulMiami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2023, 01:12 AM   #45
some.idiot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Nashville
Posts: 60
Paul, I think you have a wonderful watch and I hope you wear it in good health with good memories.
some.idiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2023, 01:28 AM   #46
Tom in Athens
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Georgia, U.S.
Posts: 7
That restoration looks fantastic! Rik just finished up a 1988 16800 for me. He is a great guy to work with!
Best,
Tom
Tom in Athens is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.