The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 August 2023, 11:32 AM   #1
IsaaH
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: United States
Posts: 8
Rolex 3135 versus 3235

Just thought I'd ask and see what everyone's thoughts are comparing the predecessor of the 3235, the 3135 movement. Seems like the 3135's were a true workhorse of Rolex's lineup (as was the even-earlier 3035s).

Judging from the discussions regarding the 3235, it would seem the older movements seem in general to have better track records when it comes to reliability. Perhaps some of these issues re. low amplitude will be ironed out in the future, or perhaps not.

If given the option today for a brand new Rolex w/ either movement, would you opt for the 3135 or the 3235? Would love to hear your thoughts and opinions.
IsaaH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 11:36 AM   #2
Auto16610
"TRF" Member
 
Auto16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: Santa Cruz
Watch: RolexOmegaPanerai
Posts: 1,182
Can of worms.

If I were you I would just do a search on this site. There are literally hundreds of posts and replies on this controversial subject.
Auto16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 11:50 AM   #3
Easy E
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,080
Just a guess, but here’s how this thread plays out
Some of this
Followed by then several
Then a tremendous amount of this

The end
Easy E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 11:51 AM   #4
Easy E
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,080
Personally, I’m in the 3135 camp currently
Easy E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 11:54 AM   #5
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,120
I’m certain we can get this thread up to 400 responses
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 12:04 PM   #6
Easy E
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
I’m certain we can get this thread up to 400 responses
Sounds about right
Easy E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 12:11 PM   #7
ridetime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaaH View Post
Just thought I'd ask and see what everyone's thoughts are comparing the predecessor of the 3235, the 3135 movement. Seems like the 3135's were a true workhorse of Rolex's lineup (as was the even-earlier 3035s).

Judging from the discussions regarding the 3235, it would seem the older movements seem in general to have better track records when it comes to reliability. Perhaps some of these issues re. low amplitude will be ironed out in the future, or perhaps not.

If given the option today for a brand new Rolex w/ either movement, would you opt for the 3135 or the 3235? Would love to hear your thoughts and opinions.
Awesome! Were overdue for another one of these. How about another poll to go along with it!

Here you go OP while this thread fills up you can start with these 145 pages of light reading.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthre...highlight=3235

And when your done try this one for even more clarity.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=911282
ridetime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 12:24 PM   #8
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,513
Plenty of resources already on this topic.

__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 01:08 PM   #9
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Oy Vey
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 01:20 PM   #10
Oytun
"TRF" Member
 
Oytun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Oytun
Location: Here and there
Watch: 5712,116500 & Rest
Posts: 303
https://www.google.com/search?q=3135...olexforums.com
Oytun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 01:21 PM   #11
Wssszsss
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: LA
Posts: 57
Nobody cares about Rolex movements, in the same time, everyone cares
Wssszsss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 01:50 PM   #12
CFR
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaaH View Post
If given the option today for a brand new Rolex w/ either movement, would you opt for the 3135 or the 3235?
I'd opt for the 3135 if the exact same watch, in the exact same NIB condition, were offered with both movements. I say that based upon multiple experiences with both movements.

That being said, I've bought watches with 32xx movements because those same watches weren't available with the older 31xx movements, and I've had no regrets doing so even though I had to send one of those watches back to Rolex 3 times. That's because I knew what I was getting into beforehand, so I wasn't surprised or frustrated. The 32xx movement issues shouldn't be a dealbreaker if you like the watch. As you've seen here from others, many don't notice problems with their 32xx movements even after owning them for a number of years. I wouldn't overthink it. Life's too short!
CFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 02:31 PM   #13
BMWMotoRider
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: United States
Posts: 123
I'd take accuracy over longer run time any day of the week so 3135.
BMWMotoRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 02:33 PM   #14
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
My 32xx only ticks backwards within COSC specs. Rolex won’t do a thing about it.

Shame!!!!
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 02:38 PM   #15
Doood
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,028
I have had good luck with 31 series movements, and not ready to try my luck with the 32 series yet. Beside, I find that ball bearing rotors tend to be louder or more noticeable, so there is data point to consider.
Doood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 03:46 PM   #16
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
I’m certain we can get this thread up to 400 responses
Pls no
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 05:19 PM   #17
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWMotoRider View Post
I'd take accuracy over longer run time any day of the week so 3135.
Uhm…. The 3135 is a COSC accurate movement, +4 -6 seconds per day (or is it the other way around? ) the 3235 is +- 2 seconds per day. So if he wants accuracy, it’s the 32.
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 05:33 PM   #18
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaaH View Post
Just thought I'd ask and see what everyone's thoughts are comparing the predecessor of the 3235, the 3135 movement. Seems like the 3135's were a true workhorse of Rolex's lineup (as was the even-earlier 3035s).

Judging from the discussions regarding the 3235, it would seem the older movements seem in general to have better track records when it comes to reliability. Perhaps some of these issues re. low amplitude will be ironed out in the future, or perhaps not.

If given the option today for a brand new Rolex w/ either movement, would you opt for the 3135 or the 3235? Would love to hear your thoughts and opinions.
Well expect myself have been wearing Rolex watches a little longer than most on forum.Take the cal 3035 first launched in 1977 that had a few problems even when the cal 3135 was launched in 1988 even that movement had a few problems in the early years.Have many watches with the cal 3135 and one with the 32 movement main reason for not more with the 32 movement is down to not because of the movement its just nothing excites me now in the Rolex range.Never been anal like many of todays Rolex owners about constantly checking daily for the exact second.With the 32 movement some might slow down a bit out of the 86400 second in a day, while others might not, but that could be simply down to owners wearing habits.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 05:39 PM   #19
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Uhm…. The 3135 is a COSC accurate movement, +4 -6 seconds per day (or is it the other way around? ) the 3235 is +- 2 seconds per day. So if he wants accuracy, it’s the 32.
Well even the bare uncased 32 movements are still tested to a AVERAGE -4+6 seconds at the Swiss COSC to get the chronometer certification.Then Rolex further tests movement in the case which is a good thing to this -2+2 spec and much like the COSC test at time of testing movement met said spec.But on the wrist wearing well thats another story because on the wrist there are many many variables.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 06:11 PM   #20
Emery
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Aus
Posts: 435
I have both.

The 4130 is the best.
Emery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 06:15 PM   #21
Driver8
"TRF" Member
 
Driver8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy E View Post
Just a guess, but here’s how this thread plays out
Some of this
Followed by then several
Then a tremendous amount of this

The end
That's about right. And spread over a minimum of 20 pages.
__________________
Rolex - 116710BLNR : 116610LN : 116622 : 116334 : 14060M
(Plus - Glashutte Original, Breitling, Omega, IWC, Tag Heuer, Doxa, Sinn, Seiko, G-Shock + micros)
Driver8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 06:34 PM   #22
OG1982
2024 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 2,035
Oh no, not this again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 07:02 PM   #23
alphadweller
"TRF" Member
 
alphadweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 6,198
I own one 3135 and two 3235s. The 3135 runs flawlessly, one 3235 is ok, the other 3235 has low amplitude (below 200º in all vertical positions after 24h) and shows poor time keeping (-6 s/d on average after a full wind).

If given the choice of movement for an otherwise similar looking watch, I'd go for the 3135. If the model I want only exists with the 3235, then I’d still get it but would manage my expectations accordingly (potential sub-par performance and shorter service intervals).
alphadweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 08:20 PM   #24
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Uhm…. The 3135 is a COSC accurate movement, +4 -6 seconds per day (or is it the other way around? ) the 3235 is +- 2 seconds per day. So if he wants accuracy, it’s the 32.
Oh man.
You haven't been paying attention at all have you

I will refer you to the date of the introduction of the "Superlative Chronometer" standard which was heralded by a literal overnight swap of the Chronometer hangtag of a totally different colour at the dealers and boutiques.

If you're feeling a little confused at this point, I probably need to inform you that I am(at this very moment) wearing a watch that has a rather accurate 3135 ticking away inside it that was manufactured many months after the introduction of the +2 to -2 Superlative Chronometer standard that is typically associated with the much heralded 32xx movements.
The new standard also covered every other movement that was current at that point in time.

I honestly think the forum will benefit from a lot less GASLIGHTING.
Seriously, it's time to get your facts straight Paul
To be clear, the "Superlative" 3135 inside the watch on my wrist, actually pre-dated the sub par 3235 which superseded it.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 08:38 PM   #25
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaaH View Post
Just thought I'd ask and see what everyone's thoughts are comparing the predecessor of the 3235, the 3135 movement. Seems like the 3135's were a true workhorse of Rolex's lineup (as was the even-earlier 3035s).

Judging from the discussions regarding the 3235, it would seem the older movements seem in general to have better track records when it comes to reliability. Perhaps some of these issues re. low amplitude will be ironed out in the future, or perhaps not.

If given the option today for a brand new Rolex w/ either movement, would you opt for the 3135 or the 3235? Would love to hear your thoughts and opinions.
To answer your question.
I will opt for a balance of accuracy and well proven reliability.
Therefore it can only be a 3135 for me despite it's main inherent flaw, over a 3235 as things currently stand.
Like many respondents there are a number of current watches that I would jump on in a heartbeat, but that movement lurking inside is the biggest turn off.

3135 rules
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 08:47 PM   #26
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
Oh man.
You haven't been paying attention at all have you

I will refer you to the date of the introduction of the "Superlative Chronometer" standard which was heralded by a literal overnight swap of the Chronometer hangtag of a totally different colour at the dealers and boutiques.

If you're feeling a little confused at this point, I probably need to inform you that I am(at this very moment) wearing a watch that has a rather accurate 3135 ticking away inside it that was manufactured many months after the introduction of the +2 to -2 Superlative Chronometer standard that is typically associated with the much heralded 32xx movements.
The new standard also covered every other movement that was current at that point in time.

I honestly think the forum will benefit from a lot less GASLIGHTING.
Seriously, it's time to get your facts straight Paul
To be clear, the "Superlative" 3135 inside the watch on my wrist, actually pre-dated the sub par 3235 which superseded it.
Well I have and done it with a Seagull Chinese ST 19 movement regulated that to well inside COSC even matched this new Rolex -2+2 standard cost at the time just $60 for the complete watch. And the word superlative chronometer has been on Rolex dials for decades, and in the real world all it means its been tested at the Swiss COSC and time of testing met the Swiss chronometer spec.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 09:10 PM   #27
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well I have and done it with a Seagull Chinese ST 19 movement regulated that to well inside COSC even matched this new Rolex -2+2 standard cost at the time just $60 for the complete watch. And the word superlative chronometer has been on Rolex dials for decades, and in the real world all it means its been tested at the Swiss COSC and time of testing met the Swiss chronometer spec.
Peter,
Please let us not forget.
The "Superlative Chronometer" labelling had no substance in marketing terms and was effectively intangible until Rolex officially announced it as a feature of their watches along with the extended warranty and longer service intervals.

I must reiterate that it was and is officially signified since the overnight introduction of the new colour "Chronometer" hangtag and global announcement by Rolex themselves.
As you have correctly pointed out above, it's also exclusive to and wholly applicable to a movement that has previously passed COSC certification before being validated in-house as a "Superlative Chronometer" assembly with the movement cased up.
Which is a crucial aspect that we all sometimes over look.
The movement is COSC certified and the assembly is a Certified Chronometer

As far as I can remember.
Those are the facts and are indisputable.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 09:24 PM   #28
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 592
A week ago as I was dining on vacation, I received a call from an AD for a 126610LN Sub-date. I politely declined. Once I believe Rolex has satisfactorily addressed the 32xx movement issues, I will be interested in acquiring a newer model again. Until then, It’s 31xx for me.
Gearjockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 09:33 PM   #29
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
I guess we can add the 32xx movement discussion to the topics that never seem to get put aside. The latest that is still going is case size, with an army of small case fans jumping on the band wagon at every new release or review of a model. I will say my selection has nothing to do with the movement and everything to do with look and fit from Rolex. The 31xx and the 32xx both work for me and it is about the watch. Accuracy that is only a few seconds off will not move me and the reported issues with the 32xx have not impacted me. So, buy what you like and will wear.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2023, 10:04 PM   #30
bjdub
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Texas
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well expect myself have been wearing Rolex watches a little longer than most on forum.Take the cal 3035 first launched in 1977 that had a few problems even when the cal 3135 was launched in 1988 even that movement had a few problems in the early years.Have many watches with the cal 3135 and one with the 32 movement main reason for not more with the 32 movement is down to not because of the movement its just nothing excites me now in the Rolex range.Never been anal like many of todays Rolex owners about constantly checking daily for the exact second.With the 32 movement some might slow down a bit out of the 86400 second in a day, while others might not, but that could be simply down to owners wearing habits.
Peter, didn’t know you had a modern Rolex. Which one?

Hate to derail a thread but since this topic has been beat to death, figured I’d ask…
bjdub is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.