ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 May 2024, 01:02 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Denver
Posts: 69
|
Explorer 2 Questions
Hi All,
I have decided to purchase an Explorer 2. I think it's the perfect watch for my needs. I used to gravitate toward a 5 digit polar but I tried on a black face 6 digit and I really like it. This will be my first rolex purchase. Any reason not to go for a 6 digit? I have small wrists but as you can see in the photo it does seem to fit me - just. Any advice or thoughts are greatly appreciated! I have a video but need 10 posts first ha Thanks, |
17 May 2024, 04:01 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Midwest
Watch: 5513,1675,216570
Posts: 1,505
|
I own a 216570 black. Great watch. It's been my daily wearer since 2018.
|
17 May 2024, 05:01 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Australia
Posts: 196
|
You should buy the watch you like. Both references will probably have their advocates but I don’t imagine you’ll go wrong with either choice. The 5 digit has an overall slimmer profile and is quite understated, even in polar. The 6 digit I believe is larger in diameter. Which colour dial speaks to you?? that maybe the best and easiest way to look at it. Enjoy the decision making process!
|
17 May 2024, 05:07 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: UK
Watch: GP Laureato
Posts: 297
|
It's a big watch but seems to fit you OK. The only way to tell for sure is get both watches side by side and see which you prefer.
|
17 May 2024, 06:32 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: U.K.
Posts: 99
|
5 digit for me all day long, but it’s subjective.
|
17 May 2024, 07:14 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
|
That looks spot on perfect IMO … APPROVED
|
17 May 2024, 07:18 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Croatia
Posts: 520
|
I "have to" wear the 5 digit because the size is perfect for my wrist, BUT, always found the hands too small and dainty.
The 6 digit one has PERFECT hands and dial, but is too large and bulky. If Rolex would make the case of the 5 digit one with dial and hands like the 6 digit one, it would make for a perfect Explorer II for ME. Since that will never happen, I enjoy the 5 digit reference, and still love it despite the "small" hands. If you can pull off the 6 digit one, go for it!! Sent from my SM-A415F using Tapatalk |
17 May 2024, 08:09 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Maui
Posts: 362
|
|
17 May 2024, 08:11 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,681
|
It's a great watch and one of the few Professional models that doesn't look like everything else. I think the black model suffers from the lack of the "ghost" hands of its predecessor. My preference is for the white dial which is the most legible watch I have ever owned. So far as size, fit and comfort go, if it works for you it works.
|
17 May 2024, 08:17 PM | #10 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
|
Quote:
Have to agree … the ghost hands were very nice Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
17 May 2024, 08:23 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: planet earth
Watch: Variety
Posts: 353
|
Quote:
Black Exp II is much nicer in my view, I do not understand why so many are obsessed with white Polar? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
17 May 2024, 08:28 PM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,681
|
|
17 May 2024, 08:37 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
I think it's a great choice!
|
17 May 2024, 09:25 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 31
|
The lugs don’t appear to hang over your wrist so I’d say it fits just fine. If you prefer the 6 digit over the 5 there’s no reason not to go for it. However, polar dial for the win 😉
|
17 May 2024, 09:32 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 42
|
Great watch! Currently dailying my white polar. It’s a big watch but fits surprisingly well as it’s relatively flat compared to subs and etc. I don’t have a big wrist but it fits comfortably. The low profile of the watch is bonus as I don’t need to worry about it much. It’s hard to settle on one Rolex so buy what you enjoy and take it from there…
|
17 May 2024, 09:48 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
|
Great watch and it looks like it fits. I own both the black and the white dial and enjoy them.
|
17 May 2024, 10:12 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Denver
Posts: 69
|
What do you mean by ghost hands? Thanks for the feedback everyone! The funny thing is I never, ever, wear anything black. For some reason to me with the larger size of the 6 digit, the black face helps keep it from seeming blingy? Does that make sense?
Thanks! |
17 May 2024, 10:13 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Denver
Posts: 69
|
Ohhh and now that I have 10 posts here is the link to the watch fitted - https://youtu.be/DypDRYhGbA0 - little wrist roll action.
|
17 May 2024, 11:06 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
The ghost hands refers to the previous version of this watch in a black dial 216570 (the picture above this post) whereby the base of the hands are black (where the hands connect to the center of the dial) which blends into the background and gives the hands a “floating” look. This is no longer the case for the most recent version of this watch. |
|
17 May 2024, 11:10 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Denver
Posts: 69
|
So the one I'm looking at is a 216570 then? Is there any big difference other than the hands?
|
17 May 2024, 11:19 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Denver
Posts: 69
|
Ahhh I see now! It is a 21670. Between the 21 and 22 is one considered more desirable?
|
17 May 2024, 11:27 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: England
Posts: 391
|
Its a great watch and wears smaller than its 42mm.
|
17 May 2024, 11:32 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,681
|
The 21 has the smooth and silent 31 based movement. The 22 has the 32 based movement with the longer power reserve and the crystal is AR coated. The 32 has a reputation (rightly or wrongly, this is the internet after all) for poor reliability. My 21 was bought new in 2018 and the movement failed this week.
|
17 May 2024, 11:35 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Real Name: Nadeem
Location: Chicago
Watch: GMT BLNR
Posts: 989
|
I’ll give a counter opinion, the 22mm bracelet is going to get annoying after some time. These bracelets are really made well which results in little flexibility. I think over time you’ll crave a 20mm bracelet.
The flat case back will really help get this watch as close to your wrist as possible though. My experience is with the sub 41, where I just found it uncomfortable after 8 hours of daily wearing. |
17 May 2024, 11:52 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Denver
Posts: 69
|
Which has the 22 and which has the 20mm bracelet?
|
18 May 2024, 12:01 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 236
|
|
18 May 2024, 12:09 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: NYC
Posts: 171
|
|
18 May 2024, 12:30 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 103
|
If you really like the white dial, my preference is for the 5-digit. The large black hands on the 6-digit in white are out of proportion to my eye. If you like the look of the black dial better, either looks fine to me and I would echo the sentiment above.
|
18 May 2024, 12:39 AM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,400
|
Counter counter-point, I had the polar 216570 with the narrower bracelet and now have the black 226570 with the wider bracelet and the wider bracelet is significantly more comfortable for me, and the AR coating makes the black dial POP. Also, I prefer the silver hands to the ghost hands for my old eyes.
|
18 May 2024, 01:13 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: UK
Watch: 226570
Posts: 984
|
I have the 226570 black dial and, personally, I prefer my GMT hand complete and not floating but each to their own. It’s been perfect over 18 months of ownership.
The only doubt I ever had was whether I should have picked polar - I think it photographs well and is a great occasional watch but I reckon black is a better daily. I do want to own a white dial watch though and I did wonder if the Exp II was the right one to go for that option with and adding in a black dial sub or GMT later. Fortunately omega have sorted that hankering with their latest white dial speedmaster which I hope will make a perfect pairing! Best of luck with your decision. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.