ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dotcomakazee · 22 December 2009, 05:30 AM

I guess this is a good problem to have.

JJ Irani · 22 December 2009, 05:31 AM

Between those 2 - the DSSD any day, any night, any evening, any afternoon, any time - end of story!!

Gerardus · 22 December 2009, 05:32 AM

Like the PAM, but my choice is 100% the DS

dotcomakazee · 22 December 2009, 05:37 AM

I dunno..the PAM looks awfully good peeking out here.

JJ Irani · 22 December 2009, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dotcomakazee

I dunno..the PAM looks awfully good peeking out here.

That's 'cause it's only peeking!!

Don't show us the rest of it!!

The DSSD outclasses it hands down!!

brady · 22 December 2009, 05:39 AM

Love the 312, except when I look at it from a side angle. From the pictures, I was dead set on getting one up until I tried one on. I much prefer the completely polished look of the 112 over the polished bezel + brushed case combo.

Lane from s.c. · 22 December 2009, 05:40 AM

I agree...the DSSD. I will say, I have had my GMT since 1985 and love it more everyday and will never sell it but that DSSD....dude I love it! Its the only watch that has truly moved me in 25 years. I don`t know what it is...it just over the top.

Lane

dotcomakazee · 22 December 2009, 05:49 AM

I should post the same thread on Paneristi and see if the responses are the opposite. heehee.

HL65 · 22 December 2009, 05:49 AM

Dssd

snow_rocks · 22 December 2009, 05:49 AM

PAM is very understated in look!

DSSD is busy as hell.

RJC · 22 December 2009, 05:54 AM

DSSD forever!!!

CorruptedSanity · 22 December 2009, 06:08 AM

Definitely the Panerai 312. And not because I own it but because I dislike the DSSD. The dial is too busy and not in the pleasing way like the Daytona. 7 lines of useless text is unacceptable.
That particular Panerai is just gorgeous.

deserted · 22 December 2009, 06:09 AM

DSSD that is one watch rolex makes that tops a lot of other pieces!!!

tkc324 · 22 December 2009, 06:16 AM

DSSD all the way...

1000ftSub · 22 December 2009, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RJC

DSSD forever!!!

indeed!

RedBaronF2001 · 22 December 2009, 06:20 AM

312 is more pleasing to my eye

You've got the time and date. That's all you need on a wristwatch.

I love Rolex in general, but the DSSD is a "miss" to me for the following:

-busy dial - way too much superfluous text
-tiny dial - compared to the rest of the watch
-tapering bracelet - just doesn't match the watch proportionately
-way too thick - we get it - it's capable to 12,000+ FT, but not so capable at 0FT due to it's massive and nearly unwearable thickness.

Having said all these negative things about it, I still want one

TurboWatch · 22 December 2009, 06:23 AM

My trusted companion while stranded at Houston Bush Intercontinental(IAH) over the weekend.

Newportkrieger · 22 December 2009, 06:37 AM

Swiss watches, German firearms and automobiles, French food and wine, English clothes, American firearms and trucks, Italian boats and food, Japanese swords and electronics......

therolexguy · 22 December 2009, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Between those 2 - the DSSD any day, any night, any evening, any afternoon, any time - end of story!!

x2

Gotta agree though. Deep Sea.

Salmosalar · 22 December 2009, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Newportkrieger

Swiss watches, German firearms and automobiles, French food and wine, English clothes, American firearms and trucks, Italian boats and food, Japanese swords and electronics......

And POLISH potato VODKA!

WJGESQ · 22 December 2009, 07:00 AM

DSSD, always and forever...out of these two.

KarlFr · 22 December 2009, 07:02 AM

Well I went to the AD to buy the DSSD but since it was completely unwearable (to tall and unbalanced for me

) I got the Milgauss GV instead.
The 312 is another story... it's bigger but it was true love at first sight

zlin08033 · 22 December 2009, 07:21 AM

312 all the way

nektar · 22 December 2009, 07:23 AM

rolex

A1000 · 22 December 2009, 07:56 AM

Both great watches but the 312 get my vote because I think that unless you're going diving, it's a more versatile watch as, despite its size it can be dressed up with an alligator strap under a suit or dressed down with an ammo strap for weekends. The DSSD, however, is a great sports watch but loses out for more formal wear IMHO.

emagni · 22 December 2009, 08:01 AM

312. I'm a Rolex fan and you can see from my signiture. I waited for the DSSD and when I had the chance to try it in the metal, it didn't spoke to me.

kcmo · 22 December 2009, 08:07 AM

DSSD for me! Of course I'm not a PAM fan though....

submariner16610 · 22 December 2009, 08:07 AM

dssd

dlite1873 · 22 December 2009, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaifAlSuwaidi

Definitely the Panerai 312. And not because I own it but because I dislike the DSSD. The dial is too busy and not in the pleasing way like the Daytona. 7 lines of useless text is unacceptable.
That particular Panerai is just gorgeous.

What he said

scl6118 · 22 December 2009, 08:38 AM

I take it you aren't a Panerai fan JJ?

22 December 2009, 05:30 AM	#1
dotcomakazee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Ty Location: Irving, TX Watch: Exp II 42mm Posts: 919	PAM 312 vs. DSSD (I just can't decide which I like better). I guess this is a good problem to have. Attached Images __________________ Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm

22 December 2009, 05:31 AM	#2
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Between those 2 - the DSSD any day, any night, any evening, any afternoon, any time - end of story!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

22 December 2009, 05:32 AM	#3
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	Like the PAM, but my choice is 100% the DS __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

22 December 2009, 05:37 AM	#4
dotcomakazee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Ty Location: Irving, TX Watch: Exp II 42mm Posts: 919	I dunno..the PAM looks awfully good peeking out here. Attached Images __________________ Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm

22 December 2009, 05:49 AM	#8
dotcomakazee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Ty Location: Irving, TX Watch: Exp II 42mm Posts: 919	I should post the same thread on Paneristi and see if the responses are the opposite. heehee. __________________ Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm

22 December 2009, 05:39 AM	#6
brady "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Brady Location: San Antonio Watch: yes please Posts: 525	Love the 312, except when I look at it from a side angle. From the pictures, I was dead set on getting one up until I tried one on. I much prefer the completely polished look of the 112 over the polished bezel + brushed case combo.

22 December 2009, 05:40 AM	#7
Lane from s.c. Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Lane H. Location: fort mill, s.c. Watch: gmt, new in 1985 Posts: 190	I agree...the DSSD. I will say, I have had my GMT since 1985 and love it more everyday and will never sell it but that DSSD....dude I love it! Its the only watch that has truly moved me in 25 years. I don`t know what it is...it just over the top. Lane

22 December 2009, 05:49 AM	#9
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,006	Dssd

22 December 2009, 05:49 AM	#10
snow_rocks Banned Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Rick Location: At what TIME?!!! Watch: the SKY tonite! Posts: 3,225	PAM is very understated in look! DSSD is busy as hell.

22 December 2009, 05:54 AM	#11
RJC "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Cheshire, UK Watch: Sea-Dweller Posts: 1,125	DSSD forever!!! __________________ Current - DSJC 136660 - Sea-Dweller 126600

22 December 2009, 06:08 AM	#12
CorruptedSanity Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Saif Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE Watch: AP Posts: 402	Definitely the Panerai 312. And not because I own it but because I dislike the DSSD. The dial is too busy and not in the pleasing way like the Daytona. 7 lines of useless text is unacceptable. That particular Panerai is just gorgeous.

22 December 2009, 06:09 AM	#13
deserted Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: fort wayne IN Watch: Patek 1909003 Posts: 2,176	DSSD that is one watch rolex makes that tops a lot of other pieces!!!

22 December 2009, 06:16 AM	#14
tkc324 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Chi town Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub Posts: 3,717	DSSD all the way...

22 December 2009, 06:20 AM	#16
RedBaronF2001 Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: Nashville, TN Posts: 575	312 is more pleasing to my eye You've got the time and date. That's all you need on a wristwatch. I love Rolex in general, but the DSSD is a "miss" to me for the following: -busy dial - way too much superfluous text -tiny dial - compared to the rest of the watch -tapering bracelet - just doesn't match the watch proportionately -way too thick - we get it - it's capable to 12,000+ FT, but not so capable at 0FT due to it's massive and nearly unwearable thickness. Having said all these negative things about it, I still want one

22 December 2009, 06:23 AM	#17
TurboWatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: NorCal Posts: 1,641	Easy choice - DSSD My trusted companion while stranded at Houston Bush Intercontinental(IAH) over the weekend.

22 December 2009, 06:37 AM	#18
Newportkrieger Banned Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Steve Location: Newport Beach, CA Watch: GMT Master Pepsi Posts: 1,243	My reccommendation,,,,, Swiss watches, German firearms and automobiles, French food and wine, English clothes, American firearms and trucks, Italian boats and food, Japanese swords and electronics......

22 December 2009, 07:00 AM	#21
WJGESQ Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Florida Posts: 3,753	DSSD, always and forever...out of these two.

22 December 2009, 07:02 AM	#22
KarlFr "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Scandinavia Watch: ♛ Posts: 1,330	Well I went to the AD to buy the DSSD but since it was completely unwearable (to tall and unbalanced for me) I got the Milgauss GV instead. The 312 is another story... it's bigger but it was true love at first sight

22 December 2009, 07:21 AM	#23
zlin08033 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: PA Posts: 1,034	Pam 312 all the way

22 December 2009, 07:23 AM	#24
nektar "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Louisiana Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,678	rolex

22 December 2009, 07:56 AM	#25
A1000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Adrian Location: UK Posts: 953	Both great watches but the 312 get my vote because I think that unless you're going diving, it's a more versatile watch as, despite its size it can be dressed up with an alligator strap under a suit or dressed down with an ammo strap for weekends. The DSSD, however, is a great sports watch but loses out for more formal wear IMHO. __________________ Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009)

22 December 2009, 08:01 AM	#26
emagni "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: on Earth Watch: ing TRF Posts: 1,284	312. I'm a Rolex fan and you can see from my signiture. I waited for the DSSD and when I had the chance to try it in the metal, it didn't spoke to me. __________________ Watches: More than my fingers can count

22 December 2009, 08:07 AM	#27
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	DSSD for me! Of course I'm not a PAM fan though....

22 December 2009, 08:07 AM	#28
submariner16610 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: united states Watch: submariner,daytona Posts: 707	dssd

22 December 2009, 08:38 AM	#30
scl6118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Shawn Location: United States Watch: SS GMT IIC Posts: 1,624	I take it you aren't a Panerai fan JJ? __________________ Current: SS GMT IIC Former: Panerai 114 Former: Breitling Hercules :

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)