The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 February 2010, 05:04 AM   #1
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Quartz vs. Mechanical

The first thing to know about watches is that all of them -- fancy or plain, expensive or cheap -- fall into one of two categories: quartz or mechanical.

There are two major differences between them. A quartz watch uses as its regulator-the device responsible for keeping time-a tiny tuning-fork-shaped piece of quartz (which is how quartz watches got their name).

A mechanical watch uses as its regulator a tiny wheel called a balance wheel and a spring called a balance spring or hairspring. A quartz watch is powered by electricity. A mechanical watch is powered by a mainspring.

Quartz watches are by their very nature more accurate than mechanical ones. That's because a quartz crystal is a better regulator than a balance wheel. Quartz crystals and mechanical balance wheels both measure time in the same way - by oscillating, or vibrating, at a constant rate.

A quartz crystal oscillates faster (32,768 times a "second") than a balance wheel (28,800 times an "hour" in most mechanical watches). The oscillations of quartz movements aren't just faster, they're also steadier. Both factors contribute to quartz's superiority as a timekeeper. The result: A high-quality mechanical movement will gain or lose perhaps five or 10 minutes a month. On the other hand, an average-quality quartz watch will gain or lose no more than 10 seconds a month, which in mechanical movement standards, will quality for the movement for the Poincon de Geneve Certification Seal, the highest quality standard a Geneva watch manufacture could receive.

Generally speaking only movements ranging in the highest standard section the Grand Complication Turbulon category receive the honor bestow.

Incidentally, one quick way to tell a quartz watch from a mechanical one is to observe the seconds hand at it turns. If it moves in one-second jumps, the watch is quartz. If it moves smoothly, it's mechanical.

So why quartz watches cost cheaper than mechanical watches? Production Volume! In 1960s, the Japanese watch & clock manufacturer, Seiko, first invented the quartz movement. Its accuracy and practice soon phase out almost the entire watchmaking industry of Switzerland. Besides that, technology revolution in manufacturing industry soon makes manufacturing quartz movement much easier and cheaper in cost than manufacturing mechanical movements.

Nowadays, the cost of a mid-level quality quartz movement is only about $1 or $2 because the manufacturing process is automated and no more craftsmanship is involved. However, to manufacture mechanical watches can never be automated because watchmaker's attention while assembling total of 140 ~ 250 different metal parts into a complete watch movement is still the key in making a mechanical watch. It's still impossible to mass production fine mechanical movements. This is where the value of a fine Swiss mechanical watch lays, soul of craftsmanship.

Quartz




Mechanical


Automatic
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:06 AM   #2
Brunotheboxer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608



Victor this is way too serious to be in "OPEN".
Brunotheboxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:11 AM   #3
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brunotheboxer View Post



Victor this is way too serious to be in "OPEN".
i dont understand what you mean....
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:13 AM   #4
Brunotheboxer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by vitix View Post
i dont understand what you mean....
What I mean is ............don't listen to me, I'm just an Idiot.
Brunotheboxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:13 AM   #5
brkanand
2024 Pledge Member
 
brkanand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: DrK
Location: India
Watch: 4=YMDaytonaGMTHulk
Posts: 7,052
Power packed info here Victor. Many thanks
brkanand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:19 AM   #6
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brunotheboxer View Post
What I mean is ............don't listen to me, I'm just an Idiot.
sorry my forum language is not quite well completed, some words like WIS, IMO, etc.. i'm still learning and english is not my primary language, but i think i just got what you said.. i dint know how to create a Closed Thread...

thank you
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:22 AM   #7
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by brkanand View Post
Power packed info here Victor. Many thanks
Gracias

Thanks
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:22 AM   #8
ParisDakarBmw
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
I'm all about the complicated hand made automatic myself. You could make a watch now days that has an LCD screen, and could change colors. I don't care for the electronic devices as a collector watch. It's the principal of having a device that has 200+ parts working in harmony that get's me.
ParisDakarBmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:28 AM   #9
Brunotheboxer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by vitix View Post
sorry my forum language is not quite well completed, some words like WIS, IMO, etc.. i'm still learning and english is not my primary language, but i think i just got what you said.. i dint know how to create a Closed Thread...

thank you
I was just mess'n with you because you posted serious stuff about watches and in this Open Section not much is serious. You did nothing wrong bro.
Brunotheboxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:32 AM   #10
Rscmaine
"TRF" Member
 
Rscmaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Nat Parkinson
Location: Maine, USA
Watch: me pull a rabbit..
Posts: 1,196
Solar.
__________________
When the alien spaceships actually landed, to everyone's surprise, it turned out that the world's governments had not been hiding anything. They were just as clueless as the rest of us!
Rscmaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:35 AM   #11
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rscmaine View Post
Solar.
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:40 AM   #12
daveathall
"TRF" Member
 
daveathall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
Great information, thank you very much for sharing.

The Chronoswiss Sauterelle 70 and 71 are exceptions to the mechanical rule, they have a Chronoswiss in house mechanical movement with jumping second hands.

Found under new items;

http://www.chronoswiss.com/
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS

DAVE


daveathall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:50 AM   #13
AWATCH
"TRF" Member
 
AWATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: al
Location: GEORGIA
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 1,759
Interesting info thanks for sharing. Just a couple of things though, Seiko did not invent the quartz watch they were the first to market them on Christmas in 1969. The Swiss actually developed the quartz analog technology in 1967.
__________________


Al
AWATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:54 AM   #14
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
Hello Victor, I think this is an interesting topic. So much so that I started a similar discussion almost exactly a year ago!

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=67259
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:56 AM   #15
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParisDakarBmw View Post
I'm all about the complicated hand made automatic myself. You could make a watch now days that has an LCD screen, and could change colors. I don't care for the electronic devices as a collector watch. It's the principal of having a device that has 200+ parts working in harmony that get's me.
X2 Very well said.

You know... it must be something in the name "Paul" that makes us all so smart, right Paul?
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 05:56 AM   #16
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
X2 Very well said.

You know... it must be something in the name "Paul" that makes us all so smart, right Paul?
yes.. i will call myself Victor Paul
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 06:07 AM   #17
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
By the way Vic, it really was very well done, I think what some of us are saying is it should probably go in the Rolex section, where serious discussions about Rolex takes place, here in the open topic section it's more for jokes, general views.... and for people to make themsleves look like idiots...

Like me for example....
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 06:11 AM   #18
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Understood, but since this is not about rolex... I posted it here
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 06:28 AM   #19
Earl Camembert
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by vitix View Post
Nowadays, the cost of a mid-level quality quartz movement is only about $1 or $2 because the manufacturing process is automated and no more craftsmanship is involved.
High end watch makers wanted the quartz makers to keep the watches high end and sell them as jewelry with gold and platinum cases and bands.

They didn't listen and now we have $5 quartz watches in plastic.

In 1971-1972-1973 Rolex only used 525,800 serial numbers.
Earl Camembert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 06:33 AM   #20
goduke1
"TRF" Member
 
goduke1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 72' Rolex Air King
Posts: 421
Ever since I received my Rolex, I have been in love with Automatic's. So much so, that I will not even consider buying quartz at this point. I even bought a inexpensive automatic to wear when not wearing my Rolex. It's a sickness!

Before getting a Rolex, I thought that any watch that had a "Sweeping" second hand was an expensive watch. I have learned so much over the past year!
__________________
Rolex Air-King 5500
Omega Seamaster Pro 300
goduke1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 06:55 AM   #21
Earl Camembert
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by goduke1 View Post

Before getting a Rolex, I thought that any watch that had a "Sweeping" second hand was an expensive watch. I have learned so much over the past year!
There was a time, not that long ago, when a "sweeping" second hand was a sign of a Rolex; not any more with ETA/Swatch making 28,800 bph movements by the tens of millions.
Earl Camembert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 06:58 AM   #22
SLRdude
"TRF" Member
 
SLRdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earl Camembert View Post
There was a time, not that long ago, when a "sweeping" second hand was a sign of a Rolex; not any more with ETA/Swatch making 28,800 bph movements by the tens of millions.
Rolex makes somewhere in the area of 2000 watches a day as well.
Quite a high number for just one company.
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try.
Yoda, Jedi Master
CHIP
Member # 87
SLRdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 06:59 AM   #23
Brunotheboxer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
By the way Vic, it really was very well done, I think what some of us are saying is it should probably go in the Rolex section, where serious discussions about Rolex takes place, here in the open topic section it's more for jokes, general views.... and for people to make themsleves look like idiots...

LikeBruno for example....

Fixed for ya Paul.
Brunotheboxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 07:02 AM   #24
G07
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
What about Seiko's Spring Drive ?? ...

Not quartz or true automatic ... the second hand runs as smooth as a baby's

G07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 07:17 AM   #25
SLRdude
"TRF" Member
 
SLRdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by G07 View Post
Not quartz or true automatic ... the second hand runs as smooth as a baby's

I used to have one, and I can't understand why I sold it. Miss it like crazy.

The SpringDrive is actually recognized/classified as a mechanical watch by the Swiss watch industry.
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try.
Yoda, Jedi Master
CHIP
Member # 87
SLRdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 03:41 PM   #26
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLRdude View Post
I used to have one, and I can't understand why I sold it. Miss it like crazy.

The SpringDrive is actually recognized/classified as a mechanical watch by the Swiss watch industry.
It's a very cool watch - best of both worlds in a lot of ways.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2010, 07:49 PM   #27
RRGHOST1
"TRF" Member
 
RRGHOST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
Seiko Spring Drives seem to be taking the mechanical watch up another notch as they seem to be very smooth running, although i have never seen one in the flesh but they get a good review. The problem with the quartz,unless its a self generating power type, like the Eco Drive or Kinetic,you have to get a battery for them and i have a draw full of watches that need batteries, and i bet most people do aswell. What everyone should do is buy a Rolex when they first can tell the time, and that watch will last them a lifetime. It would be cheaper in the long run.
RRGHOST1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 12:45 AM   #28
SLRdude
"TRF" Member
 
SLRdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
Here is the one I sold.





__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try.
Yoda, Jedi Master
CHIP
Member # 87
SLRdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 05:39 AM   #29
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLRdude View Post
Rolex makes somewhere in the area of 2000 watches a day as well.
Quite a high number for just one company.
2000!!! thats a lot!!
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 06:04 AM   #30
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
I think Hamilton and a few others were making "electric" watches before quartz.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.