The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 July 2010, 12:44 AM   #31
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Both really nice!
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 02:07 AM   #32
jonathon555
"TRF" Member
 
jonathon555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 582
Bezel finished in green/black on the gmt would be awsome.

I prefer the look of the sub c but the functionality of the gmt

But if the gmt c was a pepsi ........ Well that's a totally different thing

I think both watches look too similar at present
jonathon555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 02:13 AM   #33
timetravel125
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Louie
Location: California
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 644
Used to adore the GMTIIC from afar, up until I saw & tried on my friend's. Now I hope to get a SubC when all the excitement has quiet down. I am still in love with my GMT Pepsi, though.
timetravel125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 02:25 AM   #34
steubi1
"TRF" Member
 
steubi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Switzerland
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by mic6 View Post
I think the gmt II-c is ugly and the sub-c less ugly

The case is too squared and the bracelet thin for that supercase

I much prefer the classics 16710 and 16610
Hi Mic6,

I was thinking the same as you- until I saw the Sub C in flesh!

I like the vintage style, too, but IMHO Rolex had to do something to modernize their models....and I think they made the best without loosing the classic look of a Rolex-well done!

Look at it, and I am pretty sure you will change your mind.

BTW, if you go back in Rolex history to the 30's and 40's, I think they had similar squared casings on their famous bubble back models....didn't they?

Anyhow, I am happy with my new Sub, Rolex has made a masterpiece which is contemporary modern and classic at the same time.

Regards
Tom
steubi1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 02:30 AM   #35
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
I think I'll keep the classic SUB and go with a II-C eventually so I can have the new clasp, dial, bezel, case....
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 03:37 AM   #36
NMS75
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
I like both but the Sub is more of a classic so I lean that way :)

M
NMS75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 03:43 AM   #37
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Both are nice/great, neither on par with the Deepsea! :-) If you are into that sort of thing, that is!
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 03:44 AM   #38
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
I don't expect to see a Sub C in SA for a while.

I would need to try it for size before I decide

It will be expensive in Oz.

Having said that my GMT TTC is pefect.
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 03:46 AM   #39
newrolexman
"TRF" Member
 
newrolexman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 1,081
The GMT ll C has it all. The best of all the Rollies combined IMO.






newrolexman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 04:00 AM   #40
sefit
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Belgium-temporary
Watch: 16610&116610LN
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleddog1000 View Post
Have the GMTIIc,want the new Sub!!
I have a new sub-c and now I want GMT II-c because both are great
sefit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 04:15 AM   #41
rolexsubdate
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by newrolexman View Post
The GMT ll C has it all. The best of all the Rollies combined IMO.

I do not think it has the best of SUB or SD in it: the DEPTH Rating....
rolexsubdate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 04:30 AM   #42
Chris B
"TRF" Member
 
Chris B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteS View Post
Both are great!

They will coexist as they've done for decades...


Spot on

Chris B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 04:33 AM   #43
SDDS17
"TRF" Member
 
SDDS17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arizona
Watch: EXP2-42, DJ2, SMPO
Posts: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexsubdate View Post
The DEEPSEA willl bitchslap them both ... together...
Amen to that!!!!
SDDS17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 04:46 AM   #44
WatchForLife
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Timo
Location: Helsinki
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 59
I think the new SS SubC is definitely cool. SS GMTIIC, however, is the perfect watch. I'd like to own them both, but since I am a single watch guy, I go with the GMTIIC.
WatchForLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 05:10 AM   #45
IwozThere
"TRF" Member
 
IwozThere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Martin
Location: PA, US
Watch: GMT 16700 Pepsi
Posts: 7
love em both, wonder how long these will be around before the next change....
IwozThere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 06:56 AM   #46
mic6
"TRF" Member
 
mic6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Watch: 116718 green
Posts: 1,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by steubi1 View Post
Hi Mic6,

I was thinking the same as you- until I saw the Sub C in flesh!

I like the vintage style, too, but IMHO Rolex had to do something to modernize their models....and I think they made the best without loosing the classic look of a Rolex-well done!

Look at it, and I am pretty sure you will change your mind.

BTW, if you go back in Rolex history to the 30's and 40's, I think they had similar squared casings on their famous bubble back models....didn't they?

Anyhow, I am happy with my new Sub, Rolex has made a masterpiece which is contemporary modern and classic at the same time.

Regards
Tom
Had the ceramic gmt for 6 months and also played with the ceramic black and green subs for one hour today at my AD

Both look ugly to my eyes. Remind me of zodiacs
__________________
mic6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 08:12 AM   #47
MY-WATCH
"TRF" Member
 
MY-WATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,782
Gmt cooler for me + useful
MY-WATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 08:25 AM   #48
ahmadashmawy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: here
Watch: me
Posts: 44
no controversy GMT is COOOOOOOOOOLER
ahmadashmawy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 08:26 AM   #49
jonathon555
"TRF" Member
 
jonathon555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 582
GMT needs blue lume LOL
jonathon555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 08:34 AM   #50
al_bongo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
Both too tarted up tho GMT probably works better in the new style.
al_bongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 08:35 AM   #51
Maxseven
"TRF" Member
 
Maxseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 467
GMT-Master IIC is clearly superior. The added functionality of the 24-hour hand really makes this a no brainer.

Obviously, the Submariner is a glorious watch as well, AND the glide-lock clasp, the larger crown, are awesome.

I'll take both please.
__________________
Hooper: Watch it! Damn it, Martin! This is compressed air! Martin: Well what the hell kind of a knot was that! Hooper: You pulled the wrong one! You screw around with these tanks and they're going to blow up!

Maxseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 08:41 AM   #52
jrssv
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 386
One is a divers watch and the other is very useful for travel or to track another time zone. I have both a sub LV and a GMT IIc. Each does what it was made to do in a way that makes them classics.
jrssv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 08:51 AM   #53
George Ab
"TRF" Member
 
George Ab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
The GMT II is a beautiful watch. It is much more interesting than the sub with the fourth hour hand. However, I find the bezel is just dumb as a carryover from the original GMT before the hour hand could be changed independently from the 24 hour hand. The bezel looks very cool, but what is its function, like we really need to monitor a third time zone? I understand it can be used a pseudo timer like a sub… please no hate mail. A fixed bezel like the Exp II just makes much more sense. Also, not a fan of polished links, and it would hurt me to brush the links as it just seems well….wrong……yet right…wrong, right. You see, I would be conflicted. These are minor problems, and with that beauty I can see past these minor quibbles. Like the saying goes, I wouldn’t kick it out of bed for eating crackers.

As for the Sub C. I’m reserving my opinion until I see one in the flesh; however, it should be the nicest sub……ever.
__________________

George Ab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 11:19 AM   #54
hng
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: HaNgat
Location: Jakarta
Watch: Sports Rolex
Posts: 648
Both are indeed great watches but sub c price is much more expensive than gmt ii c. Functionality gmt ii c has more. Got my gmt ii c and sub date so won't be thinking about sub c for a many while I guess.
__________________
Cartier Tank / Suunto Stinger / 16014 / 16610LV / PAM 233 / 116520 / 14060M / 16710 / Omega Constellation
hng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 11:31 AM   #55
zlin08033
"TRF" Member
 
zlin08033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by hng View Post
Both are indeed great watches but sub c price is much more expensive than gmt ii c.
Sub C is not "much more" expensive than gmt ii c, they are very close - $7250 vs $7000 in MSRP.
zlin08033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 12:40 PM   #56
mborkow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
If I could justify the expense, I'd own both...but I'm sticking with the GMT.
mborkow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 01:21 PM   #57
bahrenj
"TRF" Member
 
bahrenj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 39
I am with Mic6 but still reserving judgement before I see the sub-c supercase in the flesh. I am glad I have my now "collectable" 16710 and 16610...
bahrenj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 01:53 PM   #58
bucku
"TRF" Member
 
bucku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Midland, TX
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 6
Love my Sub!!!
bucku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 03:46 PM   #59
labossfan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Sub C,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathon555 View Post
gmt needs blue lume lol
agreeed!
labossfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2010, 03:58 PM   #60
MitchSteel
"TRF" Member
 
MitchSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
Im partial to the GMT.However they both look wicked, and .............kinda similar.Bet my wife wouldnt know an better if I went out and bought the new sub, I could just pass it off as "Oh I've had this one for a while, Hun" watches.....muahaha.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage

Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel
MitchSteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.