ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Bruce-YVR · 5 May 2007, 10:57 AM

Hi all... Rookie here...I have a few GMT2 16710 questions. What is the size of the watch? I thought it was 42mm!!?!! I went to an AD and looked at one in person and it looked "small" compare to my Cosmoanute. I am confused here. Anyone out there got some side by side shots... GMT2 vs. other 42mm watches or GMT2 vs. Navitimer etc. Much much appreciated!! I am in LOVE with the 16710 Pepsi!! I am just afraid the GMT2 is "too small" !!

Thanks very much!!

Bruce

Flyjet601 · 5 May 2007, 11:01 AM

Welcome to TRF

my understanding is it's 40mm.......

Bruce-YVR · 5 May 2007, 11:04 AM

40mm.... Hmmm..... I like big watches... my Cosmonaute is actually my "smallest" and its at 41.5mm... I hope that fellow owners can answer my pic requests.

Bruce

C.J. · 5 May 2007, 11:05 AM

Welcome to TRF. The GMT II is 40mm in diameter

and one of the coolest Rolex's going, in my opinion

And, with a couple of extra bezel inserts, it makes three watches in one

Bruce-YVR · 5 May 2007, 11:07 AM

Thanks CJ... stop teasing me PLEASE!!!!!!! :-)

C.J. · 5 May 2007, 11:10 AM

Sorry, couldn't help myself

But, trust me, once you try it on, you'll fall in love with it

Gaijin · 5 May 2007, 11:16 AM

Saw a picture in Newsweek (Feb 26th edition I think) of Prime Minister Tony Blair of the UK with a Red/Blue GMT on. Sweet!

nko51 · 5 May 2007, 11:23 AM

40mm is just right!

ashu2289 · 5 May 2007, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce-YVR

Hi all... Rookie here...I have a few GMT2 16710 questions. What is the size of the watch? I thought it was 42mm!!?!! I went to an AD and looked at one in person and it looked "small" compare to my Cosmoanute. I am confused here. Anyone out there got some side by side shots... GMT2 vs. other 42mm watches or GMT2 vs. Navitimer etc. Much much appreciated!! I am in LOVE with the 16710 Pepsi!! I am just afraid the GMT2 is "too small" !!

Thanks very much!!

Bruce

None of the Rolexes is 42 mm. Rolex makes the biggest is 40mm and with SD it reaches almost 41mm but not more than that.
And there's no comparison with Breitlings as they hardly make any watch 40mm, almost 99% of their models are gr8ter than 40mm and 80% are greater than 43mm.

And believe me even I used to think so as before Rolex I've owned almost evry Breitling till 44mm diameter but trust me you would not find GMT or any 400mm Rolex smaller once you start wearing them. They are just the perfect sizes I think.

Bruce-YVR · 5 May 2007, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C.J.

Sorry, couldn't help myself

But, trust me, once you try it on, you'll fall in love with it

Dont get me wrong ... it is one SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEET watch

Alex Stylianou · 5 May 2007, 12:07 PM

A Very Warm Welcome To Our Forum

JJ Irani · 5 May 2007, 01:00 PM

Hi Bruce,

A hearty welcome to TRF!!

Cheers - JJ

Bruce-YVR · 5 May 2007, 01:05 PM

:

Dan Pierce · 5 May 2007, 05:20 PM

Welcome. The 16710 sits lower on the wrist and seems to wear larger than other 40mm watches. Like the others have said, it's a Rolex classic.

dP

leopardprey · 5 May 2007, 05:26 PM

40mm and a flat fitting classic. I would go with it, in my humble opinion anything bigger than 40mm is too large and is more of a fad. Over 40mm looks good if you are over 6'4" or 300 pounds or have 8" or bigger wrist. 40mm has always been the standard for the last 50 years.

leopardprey · 5 May 2007, 05:28 PM

None of the Rolexes is 42 mm. Rolex makes the biggest is 40mm and with SD it reaches almost 41mm but not more than that.

Actually the SD is a little under 40mm. Has a smaller dial as well, but it is much thicker than all the other Rolex sport watches. The Submariner No Date is around 39mm. Explorer IIs are about half a mm smaller in Diameter than the GMTs.

mlb · 5 May 2007, 05:35 PM

Welcome, Good luck with your choice!

Beautiful pictures, guys.

mopsey · 5 May 2007, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KansaiVet

Saw a picture in Newsweek (Feb 26th edition I think) of Prime Minister Tony Blair of the UK with a Red/Blue GMT on. Sweet!

Soon to be ex-Prime Minister with any luck.

ashu2289 · 5 May 2007, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leopardprey

None of the Rolexes is 42 mm. Rolex makes the biggest is 40mm and with SD it reaches almost 41mm but not more than that.

Actually the SD is a little under 40mm. Has a smaller dial as well, but it is much thicker than all the other Rolex sport watches. The Submariner No Date is around 39mm. Explorer IIs are about half a mm smaller in Diameter than the GMTs.

I didn't know the exact measurements but as in appearance SD looks pretty much beefier than other 40mm Rolexes I thought it is slightly gr8tr than 40mm.
But anywys thnx for letting me know the real thing.

mic6 · 5 May 2007, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

Welcome. The 16710 sits lower on the wrist and seems to wear larger than other 40mm watches. Like the others have said, it's a Rolex classic.

dP

i cannot agree with that
my TT blue sub wears and feels bigger than my pepsi gmt.
The gmt and the explorer II for some reason wear smaller than the other sport rolex models..never understood why
maybe the crown and the slim case

Solar · 5 May 2007, 10:50 PM

I was always a big case afficianado. I was concerned about the 40mm max size of the Rolexes, until I began wearing the SD. The size really is fine; there's a reason why the Subs etc have been 40mm diameters for 50 years plus. Its just the right fit. Now I'm very happy with the 40mm. More than enough, and I'm a big lad.

The GMT II 16710 is, as I've written before, a lighter, flatter and more comfortable (to me) watch than the SD. The crown is small (twinlock vs triplock), the height and weight are less than the SD or Subs, and you get a second time zone and the option of changing bezel colours if you're so inclined.

I think if I had to choose one, it would be the GMT II.

Just my opinion, best of luck on your choice. Bear in mind that Rolex is phasing this model out now, and once they're all sold, you'll only be able to buy the new SS GMT II supercase/maxi dial version with one-colour ceramic beze. Great looking watch with nice advances (better clasp, non-magnetising blue Parachrom spring, etc). It will be considerably more expensive as well................

Dan Pierce · 6 May 2007, 12:49 AM

Quote:

i cannot agree with that
my TT blue sub wears and feels bigger than my pepsi gmt.
The gmt and the explorer II for some reason wear smaller than the other sport rolex models..never understood why
maybe the crown and the slim case

I would agree. I meant to say the 16710 wears bigger than other brands of the same size. At least in my collection.
dP

sandman98 · 6 May 2007, 01:12 AM

Go with the GMT II. Picked mine up this week--all black bezel. Looks absolutely stunning, and appropriate for either casual or formal wear. IMO one of the best looking in the Rolex line. You won't be disappointed.

C.J. · 6 May 2007, 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman98

Go with the GMT II. Picked mine up this week--all black bezel. Looks absolutely stunning, and appropriate for either casual or formal wear. IMO one of the best looking in the Rolex line. You won't be disappointed.

You know I agree with that

President · 6 May 2007, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman98

Go with the GMT II. Picked mine up this week--all black bezel. Looks absolutely stunning, and appropriate for either casual or formal wear. IMO one of the best looking in the Rolex line. You won't be disappointed.

It isn't in the Rolex line anymore. *sniff*

5 May 2007, 10:57 AM	#1
Bruce-YVR "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: YVR Watch: PP05196G001 Posts: 55	Help! 16710 question please Hi all... Rookie here...I have a few GMT2 16710 questions. What is the size of the watch? I thought it was 42mm!!?!! I went to an AD and looked at one in person and it looked "small" compare to my Cosmoanute. I am confused here. Anyone out there got some side by side shots... GMT2 vs. other 42mm watches or GMT2 vs. Navitimer etc. Much much appreciated!! I am in LOVE with the 16710 Pepsi!! I am just afraid the GMT2 is "too small" !! Thanks very much!! Bruce

5 May 2007, 11:04 AM	#3
Bruce-YVR "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: YVR Watch: PP05196G001 Posts: 55	Good Morning! :-) Thanks for the reply... 40mm.... Hmmm..... I like big watches... my Cosmonaute is actually my "smallest" and its at 41.5mm... I hope that fellow owners can answer my pic requests. Bruce

5 May 2007, 11:05 AM	#4
C.J. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: * Posts: 10,196	Welcome to TRF. The GMT II is 40mm in diameter and one of the coolest Rolex's going, in my opinion And, with a couple of extra bezel inserts, it makes three watches in one __________________ Me? I'm still looking for Kokomo. I just hope that damn golfer isn't there

5 May 2007, 11:10 AM	#6
C.J. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: * Posts: 10,196	Sorry, couldn't help myself But, trust me, once you try it on, you'll fall in love with it __________________ Me? I'm still looking for Kokomo. I just hope that damn golfer isn't there

5 May 2007, 11:23 AM	#8
nko51 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Alex Location: USA Watch: TT Blue Sub Posts: 2,542	40mm is just right! __________________

5 May 2007, 11:01 AM	#2
Flyjet601 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Hong Kong Watch: All of them Posts: 2,789	Welcome to TRF my understanding is it's 40mm.......

5 May 2007, 11:07 AM	#5
Bruce-YVR "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: YVR Watch: PP05196G001 Posts: 55	Thanks CJ... stop teasing me PLEASE!!!!!!! :-)

5 May 2007, 11:16 AM	#7
Gaijin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan Watch: ing your back. Posts: 16,179	Saw a picture in Newsweek (Feb 26th edition I think) of Prime Minister Tony Blair of the UK with a Red/Blue GMT on. Sweet!

5 May 2007, 12:07 PM	#11
Alex Stylianou "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK Posts: 1,785	A Very Warm Welcome To Our Forum

5 May 2007, 01:00 PM	#12
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Hi Bruce, A hearty welcome to TRF!! Cheers - JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

5 May 2007, 01:05 PM	#13
Bruce-YVR "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: YVR Watch: PP05196G001 Posts: 55	Thanks guys!!! :

5 May 2007, 05:20 PM	#14
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,215	Welcome. The 16710 sits lower on the wrist and seems to wear larger than other 40mm watches. Like the others have said, it's a Rolex classic. dP Attached Images __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

5 May 2007, 05:26 PM	#15
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	40mm and a flat fitting classic. I would go with it, in my humble opinion anything bigger than 40mm is too large and is more of a fad. Over 40mm looks good if you are over 6'4" or 300 pounds or have 8" or bigger wrist. 40mm has always been the standard for the last 50 years.

5 May 2007, 05:28 PM	#16
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	None of the Rolexes is 42 mm. Rolex makes the biggest is 40mm and with SD it reaches almost 41mm but not more than that. Actually the SD is a little under 40mm. Has a smaller dial as well, but it is much thicker than all the other Rolex sport watches. The Submariner No Date is around 39mm. Explorer IIs are about half a mm smaller in Diameter than the GMTs.

5 May 2007, 05:35 PM	#17
mlb Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Chicago, Illinois Watch: DJ Posts: 753	Welcome, Good luck with your choice! Beautiful pictures, guys.

5 May 2007, 10:50 PM	#21
Solar "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: North America Watch: their hands, baby. Posts: 1,116	I was always a big case afficianado. I was concerned about the 40mm max size of the Rolexes, until I began wearing the SD. The size really is fine; there's a reason why the Subs etc have been 40mm diameters for 50 years plus. Its just the right fit. Now I'm very happy with the 40mm. More than enough, and I'm a big lad. The GMT II 16710 is, as I've written before, a lighter, flatter and more comfortable (to me) watch than the SD. The crown is small (twinlock vs triplock), the height and weight are less than the SD or Subs, and you get a second time zone and the option of changing bezel colours if you're so inclined. I think if I had to choose one, it would be the GMT II. Just my opinion, best of luck on your choice. Bear in mind that Rolex is phasing this model out now, and once they're all sold, you'll only be able to buy the new SS GMT II supercase/maxi dial version with one-colour ceramic beze. Great looking watch with nice advances (better clasp, non-magnetising blue Parachrom spring, etc). It will be considerably more expensive as well................

6 May 2007, 01:12 AM	#23
sandman98 Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Steve Location: Pennsylvania, USA Watch: SS GMT Master II Posts: 35	Go with the GMT II. Picked mine up this week--all black bezel. Looks absolutely stunning, and appropriate for either casual or formal wear. IMO one of the best looking in the Rolex line. You won't be disappointed.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)