ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 February 2011, 06:25 PM | #61 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seattle
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 410
|
Go Pepsi or go home. The new sub needs a ceramic Pepsi bezel and to get rid of that awful polished center link. Folks say that you'll adjust to the new GMTIIc in time. I won't.
|
12 February 2011, 09:06 PM | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jon
Location: New England
Watch: --Rolex--
Posts: 2,391
|
Go for the Pepsi!! Let's see some pics once you get it!!
If it is one with 3186 movement then I would go with the pepsi if the same price. It's just a little more collectible IMO. But get the one that you love. |
12 February 2011, 11:38 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 298
|
I was also in this same fog of confusion a little less than a year ago. However I already had the Pepsi, (2002 K serial #) and was considering a trade-in so I could upgrade to the ceramic bezel GMT II. For me, my issue was with the continual fading of the red enamel on the bezel. I thought the ceramic bezel would eradicate the fading red color enamel, (which I have replaced twice) and the green 24 hour hand...Well I just liked it over the red.
Unfortunately I was very discouraged at the price tag for a new SS Oyster watch, and after very careful consideration, felt that the timeless clasic design of the Pepsi, along with the duplicate design I possessed in my Tudor Submariner, were the right choices. After keeping a closer eye on the Rolex market and seeing how the demand for the classic GMT II, has increased I have no regrets making the decision. I now own two collectible time pieces. To wit, having both watches polished, which included a factory service of the Tudor Sub, and a replacement bracelet. If you can get a Pepsi, strike while the iron is hot. They will only get more expensive as time goes on. |
12 February 2011, 11:57 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: London
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 1,765
|
16710 would be my choice, but not at $7k that's far to steep
|
13 February 2011, 02:00 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
I wonder if the Pepsi has the 3186 movement for that price?
|
13 February 2011, 02:21 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Pepsi still not worth $7K, IMO...although I do suppose some would pay that for BNIB / Stickers etc...
Some sellers are asking astronomical prices in our Classified section. |
13 February 2011, 02:24 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: EC/Midwest
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,016
|
|
13 February 2011, 05:38 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 44
|
pepsi for me every day of the week - they are getting v difficult to find from reuptable sources - and its my fave Rolex of all time!!!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.