ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

apeogre · 29 April 2011, 07:52 AM

Dump the 16610. Use that money for a bit of variety. Maybe an LV or Pepsi or dj or something completely different like a Doxa.

ptugolf · 30 April 2011, 06:34 AM

I would keep both of them.

xjeeunitx · 30 April 2011, 07:43 AM

I'd keep the Date an sell the ND for something else.

sepcreek · 30 April 2011, 08:23 AM

Less is more.

Keep the no date. Much cleaner looking watch.

roadcarver · 30 April 2011, 08:32 AM

16610 is iconic... You may miss the date complication... Personally, I would.

I vote to keep the 16610.

Art 1 · 30 April 2011, 08:37 AM

I would keep the Sub, I like the look of a dateless watch.

mrbill2mrbill2 · 30 April 2011, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fauxataraxia

Happy owner of a 16610. Got the itch and picked up a 14060. Now I'm in the (un)enviable position of owning both. Should I keep both or keep one and flip the other? Thoughts?

I am confused. What is your "(un)enviable position"? You have two fantastic subs.

sleddog · 30 April 2011, 09:02 AM

Both watches are gems that should be kept at all cost IMO....

If another is on the cards, save for it!

indeuce · 30 April 2011, 10:08 AM

I really like the leather strap on your 14060, looks really good. Keep both I say and save for another!

Ed Rooney · 30 April 2011, 10:11 AM

I did the same thing as you. I ended up getting rid of both subs and got a sea dweller.

LeOnfromtheblock · 30 April 2011, 10:36 AM

I had both and sold the 16610 and ended up buying a Sea-Dweller. The 2 subs were just too similar but I prefer the no date non cosc. Much cleaner and if I want the date function I put on the SD.

Z-Sub · 30 April 2011, 10:44 AM

It depends on if you want the date feature or not.
As others suggested, if date is important, get a SD4000 16600 and swap out the 14060 if you can.

Michael M. · 30 April 2011, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moviefreak

I prefer the date feature...

I agree, i'd keep the 16610

AJMarcus · 30 April 2011, 11:02 AM

I'd keep the sub date and flip the ND for a new EXPY II. Or sell both and get SS sub c!

7S26 · 30 April 2011, 11:06 AM

keep both of them.

Jannal · 30 April 2011, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjm800

Why flip they are different enough to warrant keeping both. Plus you have the T<25 non COSC both are keepers IMO.

sea-dweller · 30 April 2011, 11:41 AM

Keep both, I have both.

30 April 2011, 08:32 AM	#35
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	16610 is iconic... You may miss the date complication... Personally, I would. I vote to keep the 16610. __________________ I'm just a cook...

30 April 2011, 09:02 AM	#38
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	Both watches are gems that should be kept at all cost IMO.... If another is on the cards, save for it! __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

30 April 2011, 10:44 AM	#42
Z-Sub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: So Cal, USA Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man Posts: 7,383	It depends on if you want the date feature or not. As others suggested, if date is important, get a SD4000 16600 and swap out the 14060 if you can. __________________ SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297

30 April 2011, 11:41 AM	#47
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Keep both, I have both. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

29 April 2011, 07:52 AM	#31
apeogre "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: No Clue Posts: 586	Dump the 16610. Use that money for a bit of variety. Maybe an LV or Pepsi or dj or something completely different like a Doxa.

30 April 2011, 06:34 AM	#32
ptugolf "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Alan Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: SubC Date Posts: 676	I would keep both of them.

30 April 2011, 07:43 AM	#33
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,529	I'd keep the Date an sell the ND for something else.

30 April 2011, 08:23 AM	#34
sepcreek Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Tony Location: Melbourne Watch: Rolex 114270 Posts: 36	Less is more. Keep the no date. Much cleaner looking watch.

30 April 2011, 08:37 AM	#36
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	I would keep the Sub, I like the look of a dateless watch.

30 April 2011, 10:08 AM	#39
indeuce "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: SF Bay Area, Ca. Posts: 127	I really like the leather strap on your 14060, looks really good. Keep both I say and save for another!

30 April 2011, 10:11 AM	#40
Ed Rooney "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Annapolis, MD Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600 Posts: 5,081	I did the same thing as you. I ended up getting rid of both subs and got a sea dweller.

30 April 2011, 10:36 AM	#41
LeOnfromtheblock "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Australia Posts: 127	I had both and sold the 16610 and ended up buying a Sea-Dweller. The 2 subs were just too similar but I prefer the no date non cosc. Much cleaner and if I want the date function I put on the SD.

30 April 2011, 11:02 AM	#44
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	I'd keep the sub date and flip the ND for a new EXPY II. Or sell both and get SS sub c!

30 April 2011, 11:06 AM	#45
7S26 Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex 116200 + SD Posts: 240	keep both of them.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)