ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 May 2011, 10:44 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oztralia
Watch: Rolex, SINN
Posts: 618
|
Chances of a new SUBMARINER? (no date)
ie. 3187 movement, ceramic dial, most probably maxi case and even 42mm?
how about colour options.. like with blue, green inserts. would you be interested. and do you reckon it will happen? |
18 May 2011, 10:48 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Well, I seriously doubt it would have a 3187 in, as that's a GMT based movement with a date. However, if they do decide to release a new Sub, it's likely that it will be heavily based on the 116610, probably sticking with cal. 3130.
|
18 May 2011, 10:48 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
My guess is they will bring out something new soon since the 14060 m doesn't gel with the rest of the line up.
I'll try to keep an open mind but, if the latest model updates are anything to go by, I'll hate it!
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
18 May 2011, 11:09 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
|
i dunno... the 14060 is the closest they have to an actual "tool watch" left in their lineup. they may leave it as is for that fact alone.
/i'm sorry; an $8,000 sub-c is not a tool watch!
__________________
2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph |
18 May 2011, 11:17 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
|
One never knows with Rolex. Any guess is as good as mine. The 14060 is the one link to the Sub of old.....
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
19 May 2011, 12:04 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Well like others have said the 3187 is a GMT watch movement but hardly a new movement.It was first a 3185 they added the slightly modded detent gears then called it a 3186 movement its now very very slightly thicker.Now they have added there own paraflex shock system to a 3186 and call it a 3187.But deep down all the complete mens size Rolex oyster watches except the chronos, are all based on the base cal 3135.All they do is add or take out complications this movement was introduced in 1988/9.And has remained unchanged except now some boast the in-house escapement parts.Myself hope they leave the 14060m well alone except for a SEL bracelet and perhaps the new type clasp.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
19 May 2011, 12:30 AM | #7 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
Quote:
i don't know if the price is what makes one a tool and the other not a tool....after all, the 14060 retails for over $6K. cheap and sturdy aluminum bezel + lug holes + light bracelet + time-tested simple and tough clasp makes it a tool. then again, we're talking rolex here, so, "tool watch" left the building a long time ago. |
|
19 May 2011, 12:35 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,282
|
The 16610 & 14060 were sold side by side....................I think Rolex will update the
14060 in the future to have same case/lug/crown guard.......ceramic bezel, new bracelet/clasp as the 116610.....no date...they will be sold side-by-side again....116610 & 114060. Maybe Rolex will keep the lug holes?
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
19 May 2011, 12:43 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
It is the last of a special breed. I guess because of that it'd be nice if they left it an all black watch.
|
19 May 2011, 12:45 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: USA
Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C
Posts: 1,443
|
My guess is that they will either update it like the Sub C or discontinue it. Only Rolex knows.
|
19 May 2011, 03:15 AM | #11 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
I think that Rolex keeps the 14060 the way it is as a classic depicting the roots of their icon Sub from the early days.....
No reason to change it, it sells fine, and it still has great looks.. My feeling is that they'll keep it pretty much the way it is (I'm sure that the new 3130 movement will fit just fine) the same way that Omega keeps their old-style Speedy Pro around... I applaud them for their hands-off approach
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
19 May 2011, 06:10 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
Like someone else said, I don't think the price has anything to do with whether or not it is a tool watch. Especially at $6,300 now. I would never even use Rolex and tool in the same sentence. Wait...I just did...well you know what I mean!
I think the no date will get the same upgrades as the Date. It doesn't make sense not to. The date and no date have been virtually the same forever. Why stop now?
__________________
Russ |
19 May 2011, 06:42 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
I'm guessing they are using up parts. Once the 14060 parts are gone, so is the watch and you'll then havea 114060......aka nd subc
__________________
member#3242 |
19 May 2011, 02:04 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
The Rolex track record up until now has been to leave the sub alone and change the date version. Debatable whether they are going to now do an about turn on this. |
|
19 May 2011, 02:15 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
Hmm...im on the fence on this one..I love the classic look but the same time would like to see what kinda improvement can rolex put on a 14060..
|
19 May 2011, 02:32 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
just a basic theory for the upgrade...
1)ceramic bezel 2)no lug holes 3)expensive and brittle bracelet. 3 strikes your out, get your 14060 while you can just my most humblest of opinions ps i suspect the gmt master will agree with none of this |
19 May 2011, 02:41 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
I think an update, if done correctly would be fine. An updated bracelet & clasp as well as an updated case, complete with lugholes, no ceramic bezel... Why not???
|
19 May 2011, 02:54 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oztralia
Watch: Rolex, SINN
Posts: 618
|
Looking at Rolex's website they don't even feature the 14060M. The same bracelet as the sub-c would be very nice, with the glidelock clasp. Pretty sure if (they did) they would upgrade it to the squarer case and maxi dial. Imagine if they did it with a 2 liner, but unlikely. They should keep the lug holes.
I tried on a sub-c the other day. The squarer case is not as bad as in the photos, I think I could live with it. The glidelock was the best feature of this watch. Anyways if Rolex do update the Submariner, it will be even more expensive than the current 14060M which is listing retail at US$ 6,300! - so with all the new updates.. $7K+ ?!? Thats a lot to swallow for a SS watch. I'm glad I got my 14060M COSC, maybe one of the last as stocks seems to be drying up at AD's and none of them I have spoken to think it will be replaced. Time will tell I guess.. |
19 May 2011, 07:12 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
I got a feeling they will update it to go along with the rest of their line up. Only time will tell, I guess we will have to watch what Rolex decides to do.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
19 May 2011, 07:14 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
I thought we would see a new ND Sub this year
Still gotta wait I guess....eventually it will happen.
|
19 May 2011, 07:30 PM | #21 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
Quote:
The GMT master may not agree with you but I certainly do! Quote:
Only time will tell.
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
||
19 May 2011, 07:33 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
I don't see it happening, at least I hope not.
|
19 May 2011, 08:00 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
|
I am sure Rolex are well aware of the iconic status that the 14060M has for many Rolex enthusiasts, and it would seem unlikely that they would bother changing it if those changes were of a nature that lost its character. If they were going to do that they would surely just discontinue it. Having said that, I could imagine no lug holes, ceramic bezel and most of all the updated bracelet. Hopefully not larger.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
19 May 2011, 08:55 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
|
19 May 2011, 08:56 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 127
|
Id be hoping for something like a homage of a vintage no date model with the modern updates.
Whatever it is I hope Rolex can bring something out as surprising as the new Titanium Blue PO Omega has unleashed, I will seriously contemplate buying that one. |
19 May 2011, 09:27 PM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oztralia
Watch: Rolex, SINN
Posts: 618
|
|
19 May 2011, 10:08 PM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
|
Quote:
/still, i'd love a 14060 as a NATO head //think my 16610 looks best on its bracelet
__________________
2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph |
|
19 May 2011, 10:18 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
I'll give you "fixed" sonny boy... I know a good vet I could take you to to get you "fixed"!!!
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
19 May 2011, 10:31 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
|
19 May 2011, 10:36 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: TN GBO
Posts: 20
|
having just bought a new 14060 and at my AD I had the new sub c and the one that I bought side by side, it took me 2 seconds to decide the 14060 is a lot better looking watch if you like the classic sub look to a watch...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.