ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

learpilot · 31 May 2011, 01:13 AM

Anyone have Pics of the New Sub c next to the Old sub.

wot_fan · 31 May 2011, 01:18 AM

Here is a comparative review that has a side by side pic.

Tools · 31 May 2011, 01:20 AM

How about a new Sub, an old Sub, and an even older Sub..

esm · 31 May 2011, 01:26 AM

lets make it more "interesting" - how about coloured 16610 and 116610 Subs?

(sorry, im not into vintage stuff )

speedo · 31 May 2011, 01:27 AM

amazing photos! good to see the evolution.

757doc001 · 31 May 2011, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

lets make it more "interesting" - how about coloured 16610 and 116610 Subs?

(sorry, im not into vintage stuff )

beautiful!

train-time · 31 May 2011, 02:44 AM

.

TDS · 31 May 2011, 03:52 AM

Great Pics Train! I too was looking for something like this.

evanvito · 31 May 2011, 04:01 AM

Nice pics

djemmtee · 31 May 2011, 04:02 AM

/like

youngr · 31 May 2011, 04:05 AM

Great pics guys

kwcsports · 31 May 2011, 04:13 AM

Nice pics. Is the newer one heavier because of the bracelet ?

learpilot · 31 May 2011, 04:14 AM

Great Pics Thank You 116610 much better IMO.

ciscopro2000 · 31 May 2011, 04:24 AM

Excellent comparison pics!

Grey.Coupe · 31 May 2011, 04:44 AM

I believe the increase in weight is mostly from the heavier clasp, thicker case, and heavier lugs. Bracelet links are actually thinner.

Sherwooddavid · 31 May 2011, 04:56 AM

Really nice pics and great looking Subs.

imono · 31 May 2011, 05:16 AM

Anyway you look at it they are all beauties from any angle

RRGHOST1 · 31 May 2011, 05:23 AM

116610 looks best, but they all look great.

train-time · 31 May 2011, 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grey.Coupe

I believe the increase in weight is mostly from the heavier clasp, thicker case, and heavier lugs. Bracelet links are actually thinner.

The increased weight is very evenly distributed. While the case is slightly thicker and the lugs a bit broader, the bracelet has solid links throughout (including the center links) whereas the 16610 has hollow (tubular) center links. The clasp is machined and is solid with a glide-lock mechanism in the underside of the top cover and a machined locking mechanism. The 16610 clasp is made from stamped sheet steel and is considerably lighter than the new style clasp.

raskal83 · 31 May 2011, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

lets make it more "interesting" - how about coloured 16610 and 116610 Subs?

(sorry, im not into vintage stuff )

This makes me want to spend money I don't have on more watches like this...

31 May 2011, 01:13 AM	#1
learpilot "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: gary Location: Naples,FL Watch: TT GMTII ,SUB c, Posts: 337	Anyone ?? Side by Side Pics of New Sub v Old Sub Anyone have Pics of the New Sub c next to the Old sub.

31 May 2011, 01:20 AM	#3
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,514	How about a new Sub, an old Sub, and an even older Sub.. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

31 May 2011, 01:27 AM	#5
speedo "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: bp, hu, eu Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln Posts: 2,376	amazing photos! good to see the evolution. __________________ *16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman* instagram: modus_horologicus

31 May 2011, 02:44 AM	#7
train-time 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Plankton Location: US Watch: less Posts: 4,161	. Attached Images

31 May 2011, 04:02 AM	#10
djemmtee "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: Tustin Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,940	/like __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN Instagram: rolexfan69

31 May 2011, 01:18 AM	#2
wot_fan Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Wade Location: Chicagoland Watch: OP, SubC, GMT II Posts: 152	Here is a comparative review that has a side by side pic.

31 May 2011, 01:26 AM	#4
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	lets make it more "interesting" - how about coloured 16610 and 116610 Subs? (sorry, im not into vintage stuff )

31 May 2011, 03:52 AM	#8
TDS "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: U.S. Posts: 77	Great Pics Train! I too was looking for something like this.

31 May 2011, 04:01 AM	#9
evanvito "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Lennard Location: Fremont, CA Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 408	Nice pics

31 May 2011, 04:05 AM	#11
youngr "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Richard Location: England Watch: 16610 & 16710 Posts: 899	Great pics guys __________________ SS Submariner Date "V" SS GMT Master II Pepsi "D"

31 May 2011, 04:13 AM	#12
kwcsports "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Kevin Location: N.S. Canada Posts: 559	Nice pics. Is the newer one heavier because of the bracelet ?

31 May 2011, 04:14 AM	#13
learpilot "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: gary Location: Naples,FL Watch: TT GMTII ,SUB c, Posts: 337	Great Pics Thank You 116610 much better IMO.

31 May 2011, 04:24 AM	#14
ciscopro2000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: San Diego Watch: 116500 Posts: 255	Excellent comparison pics!

31 May 2011, 04:44 AM	#15
Grey.Coupe "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: NC, USA Posts: 555	I believe the increase in weight is mostly from the heavier clasp, thicker case, and heavier lugs. Bracelet links are actually thinner.

31 May 2011, 04:56 AM	#16
Sherwooddavid "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Dave Location: Canada Watch: Submariner Posts: 2,080	Really nice pics and great looking Subs.

31 May 2011, 05:16 AM	#17
imono "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: USA Posts: 3,241	Anyway you look at it they are all beauties from any angle

31 May 2011, 05:23 AM	#18
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	116610 looks best, but they all look great.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)