The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 May 2011, 09:40 AM   #31
sandalgirl
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Donna
Location: USA
Watch: Ladies TT Datejust
Posts: 71
Larry

I removed the bracelet. The six digit serial number begins with an "X"

uh oh??
sandalgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 09:41 AM   #32
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Nice consultation Larry!
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:05 AM   #33
jay_man2
"TRF" Member
 
jay_man2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandalgirl View Post
I removed the bracelet. The six digit serial number begins with an "X"

uh oh??
http://www.qualitytyme.net/pages/numbers.html

Looks like a 1991 1/2 manufacture date, as you posted earlier.
jay_man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:09 AM   #34
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandalgirl View Post
I removed the bracelet. The six digit serial number begins with an "X"

uh oh??
No issues.. The X means it was made around '93, (X, C, N, and S all seem to have hit in the same time-frame. I just picked the latest) so it matches the bracelet (~94), and means that your watch was probably on the market in '95 since the TT models lag the Stainles by a couple of years..

Much newer than the Dealer told you, but all parts match..


Take a deep breath and enjoy your watch........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:14 AM   #35
jay_man2
"TRF" Member
 
jay_man2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
No issues.. The X means it was made around '93, (X, C, N, and S all seem to have hit in the same time-frame. I just picked the latest) so it matches the bracelet (~94), and means that your watch was probably on the market in '95 since the TT models lag the Stainles by a couple of years..

Much newer than the Dealer told you, but all parts match..


Take a deep breath and enjoy your watch........
The three serial number lists and the one I posted above all said 1991, just like the dealer said. Nice looking watch.
jay_man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:18 AM   #36
cheeky-m
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Norwich UK
Watch: Sub C Serti
Posts: 42
I love how everyone on this site is so helpfull.
It's good to see

Nice watch too!! Enjoy wearing it
cheeky-m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:26 AM   #37
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay_man2 View Post
The three serial number lists and the one I posted above all said 1991, just like the dealer said. Nice looking watch.
Charts....... all charts, are guesses (and most are just copied around) and they reflect when a serial prefix was first seen on the market... It is physically impossible for all X serials to have been made and sold on the same date, and gold and TT models always lag the Stainless models which charts are based on...

Therefore, an X serial was NOT made exactly at 1991 1/2.. (especially a TT) They were first seen then, and continued for the next 2 to 4 years... So, I will safely still say that this watch was likely made in ~1993, and the 1994 bracelet code verifies this conclusion..

I will stick with my researched and educated guess of this watch being marketed in ~1995...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:36 AM   #38
Christiaan
"TRF" Member
 
Christiaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Christiaan
Location: Fort Mill, SC
Watch: 67' Breitling Navi
Posts: 1,617
My only concern is the dial, it just looks...odd. But this could be from the photo enhancement...
__________________
"Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities" Frank Lloyd Wright.

"For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward. For there you have been and there you will long to return." DaVinci

Christiaan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:38 AM   #39
sandalgirl
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Donna
Location: USA
Watch: Ladies TT Datejust
Posts: 71
Thank you, one and all. Larry, you saved me an ambient tonight. And possibly an embarrassing encounter at our "been there forever" jeweler. Thank you, thank you , thank you. Would anyone here suggest I water test it, or bring it back to the dealer for that task? Donna
sandalgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:39 AM   #40
sandalgirl
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Donna
Location: USA
Watch: Ladies TT Datejust
Posts: 71
Oh, and thanks to Larry's excellent link to bracelet removal and replacement, I accomplished both. It is back on my wrist, all in one piece.
sandalgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 10:42 AM   #41
sandalgirl
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Donna
Location: USA
Watch: Ladies TT Datejust
Posts: 71
What specifically looks odd about the dial?
sandalgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 11:06 AM   #42
xjeeunitx
2024 Pledge Member
 
xjeeunitx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandalgirl View Post
What specifically looks odd about the dial?
Personally, I haven't seen anything like it.
xjeeunitx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 11:27 AM   #43
sdwtchlvr
"TRF" Member
 
sdwtchlvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,308
Glad to hear it all worked out. I had a feeling something along these lines is what happened. Great watch, enjoy!
sdwtchlvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 01:36 PM   #44
DCgator
"TRF" Member
 
DCgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
Icon6

Congrats and welcome aboard, Donna. Glad it all worked out for you.
DCgator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 02:14 PM   #45
Lisa
"TRF" Member
 
Lisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 15,741
Congrats on a great looking watch, Donna. I was intrigued with the comments about the dial, too - I thought the "jubilee" styled dial (with the sort of embossed looking "rolex" pattern) was only available with diamond markers.

Does anyone know for sure? It makes me wonder if you might have some kind of custom dial.
Lisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 02:17 PM   #46
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandalgirl View Post
Thank you, one and all. Larry, you saved me an ambient tonight. And possibly an embarrassing encounter at our "been there forever" jeweler. Thank you, thank you , thank you. Would anyone here suggest I water test it, or bring it back to the dealer for that task? Donna
Hi, Donna. Actually the "water test" is done without water. Take it to a professional--don't know if your dealer has the necessary equipment for this or not. Don't try this at home!
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 03:39 PM   #47
boogiebot
"TRF" Member
 
boogiebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
the watch looks good... the numbers on your receipt are meaningless for this discussion..

a 69163 means this..

691xx - Ladies Datejust
xxx6x - smooth bezel
xxxx3 - Two Tone
Everything is OK here..

Caseback and dial put it in the tritiuim era (before 1998)

On the bracelet the part number is good.. 18 means 18k gold and the S10 clasp code is, roughly, October 1994

So, you should be looking for a serial number that begins with S or W and is followed by 6 digits.
wow Larry that is some serious knowledge on these watches. very impressive
boogiebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 04:47 PM   #48
brettpaul
"TRF" Member
 
brettpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
For my 2c the dial looks correct to me - just an older style from Rolex - early-mid 90's.....
brettpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 08:10 PM   #49
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
I thought the Sea Dweller was the only Rolex with case back engravings.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13
mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2011, 12:02 AM   #50
robertneville
"TRF" Member
 
robertneville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: PA
Watch: me burn
Posts: 1,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbill2mrbill2 View Post
I thought the Sea Dweller was the only Rolex with case back engravings.
some of the ladies datejusts have it. my wife's case back looks the same.
__________________

Motocross is life!
robertneville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2011, 06:28 AM   #51
sandalgirl
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Donna
Location: USA
Watch: Ladies TT Datejust
Posts: 71
Rolex pattern

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa View Post
Congrats on a great looking watch, Donna. I was intrigued with the comments about the dial, too - I thought the "jubilee" styled dial (with the sort of embossed looking "rolex" pattern) was only available with diamond markers.

Does anyone know for sure? It makes me wonder if you might have some kind of custom dial.
@ Lisa....when viewed with naked eye, it appears to be a pearl colored, slightly textured face. Only when zoomed is there the appearance of a "pattern" I am going to zoom in on another watch (non-Rolex) to see if there is a pattern that I cannot see without a zoom lens. Even with my reading glasses on, I cannot see the pattern as it appeared on the first photo I posted.

Donna
sandalgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2011, 07:44 AM   #52
rad87gn
"TRF" Member
 
rad87gn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
This is Jodie's 2005 ladies DJ. It is 100% original and was purchased from my local Rolex dealer. The cyclops magnification on the ladies sizes isn't that great from the factory. Probably due to the small size of the watch.

__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52
rad87gn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.