ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

seanwatchfinder · 2 June 2011, 11:01 PM

its even trade
oj is a huge watch dealer in watch industry everyone knows him

1950b case is amazing i also have 312 mint if you interested

CoachRolexRyan · 3 June 2011, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DolphinV8

Can't say if it's a good trade or not, but you might wanna look into the 351, 321, and other 1950 cased watches. If you read paneristi, you would see a lot of people have problems with their 312.They also use P9000 in many other 1950 watches, but it seems like the 312 is always the one that has problems.

From a current 312 owner (mine is back at Panerai for a complete overhaul).

Thanks Carson, I've noticed that as well. Good luck with your beauty, she'll come back perfect. It's more of a hassle than anything else!

CoachRolexRyan · 3 June 2011, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klayface

What do you think the majority of the answers are going to be on a ROLEX forum?

Oh gee, I'm sorry! I thought this was Paneristi

Rollie2011 · 3 June 2011, 01:49 PM

PAMs are not attractive...

evanvito · 3 June 2011, 05:03 PM

I would keep the LV

elevensheep · 3 June 2011, 05:19 PM

Keep the LV man, the trade is not worth it

Abid · 3 June 2011, 05:36 PM

I Agreed with the majority here! Keep the LV!

kormaking · 3 June 2011, 06:33 PM

I believe panerai will make tons of 312 but rolex already discontinued the 11610 LV. I wouldn't make the trade.

Kiddodoc · 3 June 2011, 10:13 PM

No Way!

2 June 2011, 11:01 PM	#31
seanwatchfinder "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Sean Location: toronto Watch: AP, ROLEX, HUBLOT Posts: 38	its even trade oj is a huge watch dealer in watch industry everyone knows him 1950b case is amazing i also have 312 mint if you interested

3 June 2011, 01:49 PM	#34
Rollie2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: John Location: Palm Beach, FL Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42 Posts: 1,654	PAMs are not attractive...

3 June 2011, 05:03 PM	#35
evanvito "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Lennard Location: Fremont, CA Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 408	I would keep the LV

3 June 2011, 05:19 PM	#36
elevensheep "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: David Location: Australia Posts: 321	Keep the LV man, the trade is not worth it

3 June 2011, 05:36 PM	#37
Abid "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Las Vegas, NV Watch: 16610LV Posts: 466	I Agreed with the majority here! Keep the LV!

3 June 2011, 06:33 PM	#38
kormaking "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: GMT+7 Watch: ALS, Rolex & Patek Posts: 62	I believe panerai will make tons of 312 but rolex already discontinued the 11610 LV. I wouldn't make the trade.

3 June 2011, 10:13 PM	#39
Kiddodoc 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Rick Location: Texas Watch: 15 and counting! Posts: 3,534	No Way!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)