|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 June 2011, 10:20 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Atlanta
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 509
|
1965 GMT 1675 Metal
Is there a difference in the metal formulation that is used in a 1965 GMT 1675 versus "modern" references? I could swear that the top of my wrist gets a little sensitive from wearing my 1675 versus any of my modern models. It just returned from the RSC in December with a full service so I know it is all Rolex certified parts.
|
|
|
|
21 June 2011, 11:19 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,177
|
Well the modern Rolexes use 904L steel and the older ones 316L, or something along those lines. Higher nickel and chromium content in the moderns. Typically people can be sensitive to the nickel, so I'm surprised you have it backwards.
__________________
"Oh, you give a f****' aspirin a headache, pal!" |
|
|
|
|
21 June 2011, 11:44 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Atlanta
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 509
|
LOL! I have lots of things backwards ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
22 June 2011, 12:36 AM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 June 2011, 12:59 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Atlanta
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 509
|
I will have to get all scientific-like and try it on a Nato or Zulu strap. CSI: Rolex
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
