ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 July 2011, 12:44 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: US
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 1,468
|
Sub-C or GMT IIc? Which and why?
Contemplating which one to buy, I have had the sub-c (black and green)before and loved it. The glidelock clasp is phenomenal. The GMT IIc has the polished center links which I really like (but I might get a datejust that will satisfy that!). The GMT has the fourth hand that I will never use - which raises the question, if you don't use the GMT hand, then what do you set it to?
Obviously both are great watches, I don't dive, so the water resistance of the sub does not matter. So which would you choose? Pics of the GMT or sub won't hurt! Cheers, Eric |
11 July 2011, 12:49 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
|
Sub c because of the Glidelock clasp.
|
11 July 2011, 01:06 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
I have owned both...I sold the GMTIIC and kept the SubC. I prefer the Glidelock, the more subdued bezel font and the chromalite dial markers on the Submariner. In addition, the PCLs drove me nuts on the GMT. It seemed like they would scratch by just looking at them.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
11 July 2011, 01:11 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
|
I'd go for GMTIIC.
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats |
11 July 2011, 01:14 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
Have had 2 Sub Cs. Sold them both and now have a GMTIIC and could not be happier.
|
11 July 2011, 01:36 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
I had the same decision to make when I upgraded from my 16610...
I went with the Sub C... Its a more subdued look. Not so many hands. Not so many numbers. Its clean, classic and classy |
11 July 2011, 01:54 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Quote:
Interesting choices. You don't dive / but want a Sub. You don't travel, but are considering a GMT. Maybe the DJ is the best choice...very different watch though. |
|
11 July 2011, 01:59 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No Clue
Posts: 586
|
GMT for it's uber comfy case.
|
11 July 2011, 02:46 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: RG DD40
Posts: 1,149
|
i bought the gmt... love the pcl
__________________
"Did you get that at retail?" |
11 July 2011, 04:58 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
looks like you dont have any need for either of those watches.
get a datejust or go with another brand entirely |
11 July 2011, 06:31 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
I prefer the SubC...
But if you've had it already then I would try something new and go for the GMTC.
I also don't travel much so I keep the 2nd time zone set at my local standard time. PCLs are very nice and dress the watch up just the right amount.. Here's a pic- |
11 July 2011, 09:26 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
If you have already had but traded away the Sub C, then maybe it is time to try the GMTIIC.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
11 July 2011, 10:04 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Vukota Brajovi
Location: Belgrade,Serbia
Watch: ing movies!
Posts: 3,812
|
Judged only by appearance, Sub C LV is my personal favorite.
But, since you already had Sub C, why don`t go with GMT IIc this time? Great looking watch, I like PCL (it gives it somewhat dressier look) and second time zone complication is really nice addition to already perfect watch!
__________________
My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/ |
11 July 2011, 10:46 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London/Switz
Watch: Sub's/OysterP/...
Posts: 236
|
sub, polished bracelet gets buggered easily, plus sub IMO looks nicer and is the classic!
__________________
Its better to be feared than loved, for fear is controllable but love never |
11 July 2011, 11:00 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: emad
Location: Kuwait
Watch: LV-PAM312-214270
Posts: 252
|
both are nice , just tack what you prefer :)
|
11 July 2011, 11:05 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex Air-King
Posts: 4,468
|
Both great watches...
However the GMT is awesome... and don't let the PCL get in the way of your decision because you can always get them brushed... So what do you think now?
__________________
Instagram: timeonhand1010 |
11 July 2011, 11:41 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
|
how could someone decide this for you? both great watches, both rolex.
i chose the sub (simpler, the clasp felt better and no pcls) but had i chosen the gmt i'd be just as happy right now.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman instagram: modus_horologicus |
11 July 2011, 11:59 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
Tie for me on this one!
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
12 July 2011, 12:22 AM | #19 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: US
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 1,468
|
Quote:
As far as the GMT I'm sure many people buy it strictly because of it's second time zone feature. As far as looking at another brand! Common now, I want a Rolex. Just because I might not need the features, that certainly does not mean I can't enjoy the quality, design and class of having it. |
|
12 July 2011, 12:27 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
True...but you don't seem to really care for the watches you mentioned.
Perhaps you have already made a decision? |
12 July 2011, 12:38 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Matt
Location: London
Watch: Submariner-16610LV
Posts: 1,798
|
Both are great watches, but Personally I would go for the Sub-C as I think it looks much neater and not as busy as the GMT II C. Also the Sub-C has the advantage of the glidelock clasp. Sub-C all the way personally !
__________________
Rolex Submariner - 16610LV |
12 July 2011, 12:39 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,060
|
I've owned both, and it depends on your use. If you fly a fair amount though different time zones, then the GMT is very handy. If you jog, time your steaks on the bar-b-que, and so on, the Sub C is better as the detentes on the GMT do not allow for single minute timing. And of course, if you actually dive, then the Submariner is better.
My final solution was the TT 16613 Ceramic Sub in black. Had mine about a year and love it. |
12 July 2011, 12:42 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Turkey
Watch: 116610 LN
Posts: 356
|
They feel nearly the same on the wrist. Both are excellent watches.
Tyr both and buy thats sings to you, IMHO. |
14 July 2011, 06:45 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 16
|
Got to try them both on - the GMT looks great in the pics but I've got one and it's just not 100% me - only about 90% me - I had a 16600 SD before it and I want to go back there - either another SD or a BNIB/LNIB Sub ND 14060M - I love the clean dial 14060 non-COSC but would feel safer going for the newer COSC. You can't decide by looking at pics.
|
14 July 2011, 06:47 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Thien
Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 2,754
|
GMTIIc.
__________________
Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO |
14 July 2011, 06:52 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Adam
Location: Texas
Watch: G-Shock!
Posts: 383
|
I like the GMTIIc more just because it is more practical to me. I have lots of relatives over the globe and travel quite a bit. JMHO. Can't go wrong with either.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.