ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

wingo · 17 July 2011, 01:14 AM

I belive that I initially posted this in the wrong forum, but need assisstance. Please read my thread here;

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=185728

vukotab · 17 July 2011, 04:56 AM

And here`s the same answer:

That`s the watch that once probably was Tudor Oysterdate, but it`s re-dialed and fitted with incorrect Mercedes hands.
Inscription "Rolex" is wrongest thing of all, it`s NOT a Rolex, it`s frankenwatch made of Tudor parts. (I`m proud Tudor owner and I love Tudor more than anybody, but it have to be the genuine one)

If movement is correct one (Tudor signed ETA 2671 or 2824 I think) and Oyster case and bracelet are real deal, than this watch have SOME value, but I suggest you to pass on this one.

17 July 2011, 01:14 AM	#1
wingo "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Texas Posts: 15	Vintage Oyster Perpetual I belive that I initially posted this in the wrong forum, but need assisstance. Please read my thread here; http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=185728

17 July 2011, 04:56 AM	#2
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	And here`s the same answer: That`s the watch that once probably was Tudor Oysterdate, but it`s re-dialed and fitted with incorrect Mercedes hands. Inscription "Rolex" is wrongest thing of all, it`s NOT a Rolex, it`s frankenwatch made of Tudor parts. (I`m proud Tudor owner and I love Tudor more than anybody, but it have to be the genuine one) If movement is correct one (Tudor signed ETA 2671 or 2824 I think) and Oyster case and bracelet are real deal, than this watch have SOME value, but I suggest you to pass on this one. __________________ My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)