ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

clarencek · 22 July 2011, 01:31 AM

So I have the opportunity to trade:

1 x White Dial SS Daytona - V series
1 x Black SS Sub C - V series

for

1 x PP 5711/1A SS Nautilus

I'll probably have to throw in some money as well (maybe $2K). But would you do this trade?
The Nautilus is a grail for me, but to be honest, I'm not sure I'm ready for a Patek. Yet, I feel like if I don't do this now, it may be a while before an opportunity like this comes up.
Any thoughts... I'll do a poll to make this easy. :-) Thanks!

Rollie2011 · 22 July 2011, 01:34 AM

Would I do this trade? No. 2 > 1, especially those two awesome pieces.

Should YOU do the trade? Well, that is entirely up to you and what makes you happy

padi56 · 22 July 2011, 01:39 AM

Sorry two watches dont equal one watch IMHO even if its made by Patek.

dddrees · 22 July 2011, 01:40 AM

I wouldn't do it because I like having more options. I also prefer the way these 2 Rolex models look more than the Patek in this case. Rolex watches also are known for their durability, I'm not to sure how tough the Patek Nautilus is. I would also have to consider the service costs for a Patek and the turn around time when it is being serviced if I where to only have 1 vs 2 watches.

I personally wouldn't do it.

nauticajoe · 22 July 2011, 01:41 AM

Make sure you think long & hard. I wouldn't do the trade.

smallcandle · 22 July 2011, 01:42 AM

I wouldn't do the trade either.

kareemthedream33 · 22 July 2011, 01:49 AM

Are those the only two watches you own? If so, then no.

rad87gn · 22 July 2011, 01:53 AM

Nope, no way.

clarencek · 22 July 2011, 01:57 AM

Thanks all - you guys are great. :-)
No trade.. I'll save up and thanks for talking me off the Rolex ledge.

novae500 · 22 July 2011, 02:00 AM

no, i rather have the option of two watches vs one

A.J.R. · 22 July 2011, 02:04 AM

No thanks on the trade.

petesjag · 22 July 2011, 02:07 AM

nope...!

Paracentesis · 22 July 2011, 02:07 AM

I would go for it in a heartbeat. The PP Nautilus is a hand-finished high-end watch in short supply, whilst the Rolexes are mid-market, mass-produced and easy enough to replace if you really wanted to. I'd go for the 5712, personally.

dmacintyre · 22 July 2011, 02:08 AM

No. It's called "putting all your eggs in one basket" and that's not usually a good idea, especially when you lose an iconic chrono and an iconic diver to do so. You'll probably get to the Nautilus some day but I don't think this is a wise way to do it. It's a grail for me too BTW.

Caraptor · 22 July 2011, 02:09 AM

Got ready to put in my .02, but I see you've come to a decision. Save away! You can do it. Two years is easy. I'll be at two years of watch saving this December. Not bad at all.
I voted to trade, FYI.

Paracentesis · 22 July 2011, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmacintyre

No. It's called "putting all your eggs in one basket" and that's not usually a good idea, especially when you lose an iconic chrono and an iconic diver to do so. You'll probably get to the Nautilus some day but I don't think this is a wise way to do it. It's a grail for me too BTW.

The OP has 7 watches.

Director EDTF · 22 July 2011, 02:12 AM

I vote with all the Nos

xblk33360 · 22 July 2011, 02:12 AM

no. i would not do the trade. the only watches that look nice from PP are their calatravas and their complicated dress watches. the nautilus is, imho, quite ugly.

Dr. Robert · 22 July 2011, 02:13 AM

I........vote...........NO, NEIN, NYET, NON

Paracentesis · 22 July 2011, 02:15 AM

To really appreciate the Nautilus, you have to try it on. It's absolutely stunning, IMHO.

dmacintyre · 22 July 2011, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paracentesis

The OP has 7 watches.

Ah, I didn't see all those in his sig. In that case I'm saying definitely do it.

Kanger · 22 July 2011, 02:16 AM

You already have an extensive Rolex collection. A PP is the pinnacle. I'd do it without a doubt. :)

Dan2010 · 22 July 2011, 02:16 AM

Not for a Patek. No way Jose.

757doc001 · 22 July 2011, 02:17 AM

I dont favor that look, and I dont know much about the brand in general, except that is sought after and high end but still no!

TSW · 22 July 2011, 02:18 AM

Not for me

mjm800 · 22 July 2011, 02:21 AM

Not for me I know the SS Nautilus is a very expensive watch but I think as far a beauty goes the Sub and Daytona easily outshine it.

I say no.

Dr. Robert · 22 July 2011, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjm800

Not for me I know the SS Nautilus is a very expensive watch but I think as far a beauty goes the Sub and Daytona easily outshine it.

I say no.

Bah humbug....I couldn't have said it better.

Paracentesis · 22 July 2011, 02:41 AM

Dr Bob,

It's your sort of watch: lugholes are present.

kareemthedream33 · 22 July 2011, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmacintyre

Ah, I didn't see all those in his sig. In that case I'm saying definitely do it.

Now that I know the OP has 7 watches I would definitely DO IT!!!

ocwatching · 22 July 2011, 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paracentesis

I would go for it in a heartbeat. The PP Nautilus is a hand-finished high-end watch in short supply, whilst the Rolexes are mid-market, mass-produced and easy enough to replace if you really wanted to. I'd go for the 5712, personally.

+1
and get the 5712...
I didn't vote...

View Poll Results: Trade a Daytona & Sub C for 1 PP Nautilus
Yes, do it	27	27.84%
No, 2 does not equal 1	33	34.02%
Don't trade, save up buy it in 2 years	37	38.14%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

22 July 2011, 01:31 AM	#1
clarencek "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: New York Posts: 400	Another... Would You Do This Trade? So I have the opportunity to trade: 1 x White Dial SS Daytona - V series 1 x Black SS Sub C - V series for 1 x PP 5711/1A SS Nautilus I'll probably have to throw in some money as well (maybe $2K). But would you do this trade? The Nautilus is a grail for me, but to be honest, I'm not sure I'm ready for a Patek. Yet, I feel like if I don't do this now, it may be a while before an opportunity like this comes up. Any thoughts... I'll do a poll to make this easy. :-) Thanks! __________________ Citizen AQ4020-54X, NB6005-05L, NB6006-02X, Casio GMW-B5000TFC, MRG-B5000B, MTG-B1000XB, Hamilton Field Khaki H70605731, IWC IW356501, IWC387902, Longines Spirit L3.810.4.93.0, MKII PMWF Graywater GMT, Project 300, Omega 210.92.42.20.01.001, 304.33.44.52.03.001, Rolex 116400GV, 116520, 116610LV, 126600, 326933, Seiko SBGA001, SLA019, Sinn U1-ST

22 July 2011, 01:39 AM	#3
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,062	Sorry two watches dont equal one watch IMHO even if its made by Patek. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

22 July 2011, 01:40 AM	#4
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	I wouldn't do it because I like having more options. I also prefer the way these 2 Rolex models look more than the Patek in this case. Rolex watches also are known for their durability, I'm not to sure how tough the Patek Nautilus is. I would also have to consider the service costs for a Patek and the turn around time when it is being serviced if I where to only have 1 vs 2 watches. I personally wouldn't do it. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

22 July 2011, 01:42 AM	#6
smallcandle "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Kansas Watch: 16610, Omega PO Posts: 1,898	I wouldn't do the trade either. __________________ Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown...

22 July 2011, 01:34 AM	#2
Rollie2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: John Location: Palm Beach, FL Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42 Posts: 1,654	Would I do this trade? No. 2 > 1, especially those two awesome pieces. Should YOU do the trade? Well, that is entirely up to you and what makes you happy

22 July 2011, 01:41 AM	#5
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Make sure you think long & hard. I wouldn't do the trade.

22 July 2011, 01:49 AM	#7
kareemthedream33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Canada Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,748	Are those the only two watches you own? If so, then no.

22 July 2011, 01:53 AM	#8
rad87gn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chad Location: Des Moines, Iowa Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega Posts: 1,607	Nope, no way. __________________ Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52

22 July 2011, 01:57 AM	#9
clarencek "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: New York Posts: 400	Thanks all - you guys are great. :-) No trade.. I'll save up and thanks for talking me off the Rolex ledge. __________________ Citizen AQ4020-54X, NB6005-05L, NB6006-02X, Casio GMW-B5000TFC, MRG-B5000B, MTG-B1000XB, Hamilton Field Khaki H70605731, IWC IW356501, IWC387902, Longines Spirit L3.810.4.93.0, MKII PMWF Graywater GMT, Project 300, Omega 210.92.42.20.01.001, 304.33.44.52.03.001, Rolex 116400GV, 116520, 116610LV, 126600, 326933, Seiko SBGA001, SLA019, Sinn U1-ST

22 July 2011, 02:00 AM	#10
novae500 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: VA Posts: 965	no, i rather have the option of two watches vs one __________________ 326933 SkyDweller, 126711 GMT II CHNR 12600 DeepSea Seadweller 14060 No Date Submariner 16710 GMT II Pepsi N-Series, Coke F Series

22 July 2011, 02:04 AM	#11
A.J.R. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: AJ Location: Oregon Watch: SUBC, DJII Posts: 1,827	No thanks on the trade. __________________

22 July 2011, 02:07 AM	#12
petesjag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: netherlands Posts: 2,177	nope...!

22 July 2011, 02:07 AM	#13
Paracentesis Banned Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Tissot Posts: 1,454	I would go for it in a heartbeat. The PP Nautilus is a hand-finished high-end watch in short supply, whilst the Rolexes are mid-market, mass-produced and easy enough to replace if you really wanted to. I'd go for the 5712, personally.

22 July 2011, 02:08 AM	#14
dmacintyre 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: USA Posts: 252	No. It's called "putting all your eggs in one basket" and that's not usually a good idea, especially when you lose an iconic chrono and an iconic diver to do so. You'll probably get to the Nautilus some day but I don't think this is a wise way to do it. It's a grail for me too BTW.

22 July 2011, 02:09 AM	#15
Caraptor Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: me save for it. Posts: 444	Got ready to put in my .02, but I see you've come to a decision. Save away! You can do it. Two years is easy. I'll be at two years of watch saving this December. Not bad at all. I voted to trade, FYI.

22 July 2011, 02:12 AM	#17
Director EDTF 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Nelson Location: Central, NJ Posts: 2,466	I vote with all the Nos

22 July 2011, 02:12 AM	#18
xblk33360 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Vancouver, B.C. Watch: DJ II, Calibre. Posts: 68	no. i would not do the trade. the only watches that look nice from PP are their calatravas and their complicated dress watches. the nautilus is, imho, quite ugly.

22 July 2011, 02:13 AM	#19
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,258	I........vote...........NO, NEIN, NYET, NON __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

22 July 2011, 02:15 AM	#20
Paracentesis Banned Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Tissot Posts: 1,454	To really appreciate the Nautilus, you have to try it on. It's absolutely stunning, IMHO.

22 July 2011, 02:16 AM	#22
Kanger Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: North Carolina Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 5,524	You already have an extensive Rolex collection. A PP is the pinnacle. I'd do it without a doubt. :)

22 July 2011, 02:16 AM	#23
Dan2010 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: South Carolina Watch: Panerai 914 Posts: 6,540	Not for a Patek. No way Jose.

22 July 2011, 02:17 AM	#24
757doc001 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Jason Location: Virginia Watch: 116610LN C Posts: 478	I dont favor that look, and I dont know much about the brand in general, except that is sought after and high end but still no! __________________ Don't just make a living, make a difference!

22 July 2011, 02:18 AM	#25
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Not for me __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

22 July 2011, 02:21 AM	#26
mjm800 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Posts: 1,950	Not for me I know the SS Nautilus is a very expensive watch but I think as far a beauty goes the Sub and Daytona easily outshine it. I say no. __________________

22 July 2011, 02:41 AM	#28
Paracentesis Banned Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Tissot Posts: 1,454	Dr Bob, It's your sort of watch: lugholes are present.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)