ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

beachbum · 22 July 2011, 10:03 AM

Hey guys which would you choose between the these two? There seems to be a lot of love for the GV milgauss just curious to see what everyone thinks

Time2time · 22 July 2011, 10:06 AM

Milgauss GV for sure!
But I am bias.

I have a Sub-c also but that comes a close second.

esm · 22 July 2011, 10:12 AM

*cough* *both*

TSW · 22 July 2011, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

*cough* *both*

beachbum · 22 July 2011, 10:18 AM

That is just a ridiculous picture! WOW! However it was absolutely no help whatsoever

:

sleddog · 22 July 2011, 10:20 AM

Nice shot Eric~~~

Go for the one that you feel would get the most wrist time and admiration by yourself John!

Good luck on the choice.

Speed · 22 July 2011, 10:27 AM

Are you actually deciding between the two?

If so, what are your pros abd cons?

EDT3 · 22 July 2011, 10:33 AM

Tough choice. Will this be your first Rolex? For a first, between the two, I would go with the LV. More versatile IMO. But, if you're adding to the collection, the Milgauss.

Art 1 · 22 July 2011, 10:36 AM

Easily the LV.

clarencek · 22 July 2011, 10:45 AM

Having both watches, I would say the LV. It's easily more wearable and versatile.

mjm800 · 22 July 2011, 10:49 AM

LV it's one of my must own watches the Milgauss not so much.

ManUtd · 22 July 2011, 10:49 AM

I'd go with the LV.

Abid · 22 July 2011, 10:52 AM

16610 LV! Tried on the Milgauss didn't sit well on my wrist! Good luck!

Andad · 22 July 2011, 11:27 AM

I like both but the GV is 'different'.

ptugolf · 22 July 2011, 11:27 AM

LV, LV and LV.

chazha · 22 July 2011, 12:15 PM

I got both.. If to keep one only... Ack its tough. I honestly dont know.

gqllc · 22 July 2011, 12:51 PM

LV for sure!

Kanger · 22 July 2011, 12:56 PM

Honestly two of my favorite three Rolex, GMT II C is the other. If I HAD to choose, LV over the GV by a hair, reason being there is less polished surface and brushed bracelet.

andrew79 · 22 July 2011, 01:08 PM

LV and bias here.

Rollie2011 · 22 July 2011, 01:16 PM

GV for sure

MortgageGuy · 22 July 2011, 01:18 PM

Without a doubt I would grab the LV, IMHO it is one of the best looking Rolex out there and I do not even own one anymore

willco · 22 July 2011, 01:36 PM

Have a black Milgauss and LV Sub. LV is definately an everyday wear. Milgauss is thicker and heavier and tends to feel bulky at times.

scrog10 · 22 July 2011, 05:47 PM

I think the milgauss is more interesting. A splash of colour on the hour markers and second hand. The lume glows in two different colours plus the bracelet and clasp is way better than the LV.
And of course its alot rarer than the LV.(submariner)
The LV is clearer with the maxi dial.

Puffy · 22 July 2011, 06:09 PM

I vote GV

speedo · 22 July 2011, 06:29 PM

do you have other watches or is this going to be your only one? do you wear suit and tie mostly or casual?
i like both however i chose between the 116610 and the milgauss (gv or wf). opted for the subc but my next is probably a milgauss for the dressier occasions.

le_baroudeur · 23 July 2011, 03:44 AM

Just look at THIS green...

dalip · 23 July 2011, 04:14 AM

I'd go LV also...it's a more versatile watch with the insert change - Along with the maxi dial it really is a fantastic submariner.

stockae92 · 23 July 2011, 06:11 AM

if its just one, then i would go with LV. I like triple lock crown and maxi dial more than green crystal :-)

travisb · 23 July 2011, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

*cough* *both*

Really nice pic!!! Makes me want both

travisb · 23 July 2011, 06:23 AM

Such a tough call for me as they both just soooo nice. At the moment I'd be leaning towards GV. Then I'd probably change my mind 20 more times

22 July 2011, 10:03 AM	#1
beachbum "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: john Location: new jersey Watch: Incoming Posts: 564	16610 LV or Milgauss GV? Hey guys which would you choose between the these two? There seems to be a lot of love for the GV milgauss just curious to see what everyone thinks

22 July 2011, 10:18 AM	#5
beachbum "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: john Location: new jersey Watch: Incoming Posts: 564	Awesome That is just a ridiculous picture! WOW! However it was absolutely no help whatsoever :

22 July 2011, 10:20 AM	#6
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	Nice shot Eric~~~ Go for the one that you feel would get the most wrist time and admiration by yourself John! Good luck on the choice. __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

22 July 2011, 10:45 AM	#10
clarencek "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: New York Posts: 400	Having both watches, I would say the LV. It's easily more wearable and versatile. __________________ Citizen AQ4020-54X, NB6005-05L, NB6006-02X, Casio GMW-B5000TFC, MRG-B5000B, MTG-B1000XB, Hamilton Field Khaki H70605731, IWC IW356501, IWC387902, Longines Spirit L3.810.4.93.0, MKII PMWF Graywater GMT, Project 300, Omega 210.92.42.20.01.001, 304.33.44.52.03.001, Rolex 116400GV, 116520, 116610LV, 126600, 326933, Seiko SBGA001, SLA019, Sinn U1-ST

22 July 2011, 10:49 AM	#11
mjm800 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Posts: 1,950	LV it's one of my must own watches the Milgauss not so much. __________________

22 July 2011, 10:06 AM	#2
Time2time Banned Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: U.K Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C Posts: 2,178	Milgauss GV for sure! But I am bias. I have a Sub-c also but that comes a close second.

22 July 2011, 10:12 AM	#3
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	cough both

22 July 2011, 10:27 AM	#7
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	Are you actually deciding between the two? If so, what are your pros abd cons?

22 July 2011, 10:33 AM	#8
EDT3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: AZ Watch: GMT II Coke Posts: 132	Tough choice. Will this be your first Rolex? For a first, between the two, I would go with the LV. More versatile IMO. But, if you're adding to the collection, the Milgauss.

22 July 2011, 10:36 AM	#9
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	Easily the LV.

22 July 2011, 10:49 AM	#12
ManUtd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Eric Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 1,613	I'd go with the LV. __________________ 116520 116610LN 126334 126600 PAM986

22 July 2011, 10:52 AM	#13
Abid "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Las Vegas, NV Watch: 16610LV Posts: 466	16610 LV! Tried on the Milgauss didn't sit well on my wrist! Good luck!

22 July 2011, 11:27 AM	#14
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,534	I like both but the GV is 'different'. Attached Images __________________ E

22 July 2011, 11:27 AM	#15
ptugolf "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Alan Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: SubC Date Posts: 676	LV, LV and LV.

22 July 2011, 12:15 PM	#16
chazha "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: ChairmanMao Location: NY, US Watch: mickey watch Posts: 837	I got both.. If to keep one only... Ack its tough. I honestly dont know. __________________ I am always single, even when I am married.

22 July 2011, 12:51 PM	#17
gqllc "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Steve Location: Albany NY Watch: Blue Bezel SubC Posts: 1,511	LV for sure! __________________ K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC

22 July 2011, 12:56 PM	#18
Kanger Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: North Carolina Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 5,524	Honestly two of my favorite three Rolex, GMT II C is the other. If I HAD to choose, LV over the GV by a hair, reason being there is less polished surface and brushed bracelet.

22 July 2011, 01:08 PM	#19
andrew79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Andrew Location: Indonesia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,277	LV and bias here. __________________ Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232

22 July 2011, 01:16 PM	#20
Rollie2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: John Location: Palm Beach, FL Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42 Posts: 1,654	GV for sure

22 July 2011, 01:18 PM	#21
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	Without a doubt I would grab the LV, IMHO it is one of the best looking Rolex out there and I do not even own one anymore __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

22 July 2011, 01:36 PM	#22
willco Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Will Location: Massacusetts Watch: Milgauss black Posts: 20	Have a black Milgauss and LV Sub. LV is definately an everyday wear. Milgauss is thicker and heavier and tends to feel bulky at times.

22 July 2011, 05:47 PM	#23
scrog10 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Simon Location: Devon U.K Watch: Rolex GMT 2c Posts: 240	I think the milgauss is more interesting. A splash of colour on the hour markers and second hand. The lume glows in two different colours plus the bracelet and clasp is way better than the LV. And of course its alot rarer than the LV.(submariner) The LV is clearer with the maxi dial. __________________ IWC Aquatimer 2000, Rolex GMT 2c[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC], Breitling Aerospace.

22 July 2011, 06:09 PM	#24
Puffy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 12,485	I vote GV __________________ Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten

22 July 2011, 06:29 PM	#25
speedo "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: bp, hu, eu Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln Posts: 2,376	do you have other watches or is this going to be your only one? do you wear suit and tie mostly or casual? i like both however i chose between the 116610 and the milgauss (gv or wf). opted for the subc but my next is probably a milgauss for the dressier occasions. __________________ *16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman* instagram: modus_horologicus

23 July 2011, 03:44 AM	#26
le_baroudeur "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Rennes, FRANCE Posts: 802	Just look at THIS green... __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons.

23 July 2011, 04:14 AM	#27
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	I'd go LV also...it's a more versatile watch with the insert change - Along with the maxi dial it really is a fantastic submariner. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

23 July 2011, 06:11 AM	#28
stockae92 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Socal Posts: 4,964	if its just one, then i would go with LV. I like triple lock crown and maxi dial more than green crystal :-)

23 July 2011, 06:23 AM	#30
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,500	I've owned the LV but not the GV Such a tough call for me as they both just soooo nice. At the moment I'd be leaning towards GV. Then I'd probably change my mind 20 more times

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)