ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

tylerad1 · 23 July 2011, 12:40 AM

I've slowly been working my way up the wristwatch prestige ladder, and have finally arrived upon a Rolex as my next must-have timepiece. Here's my progression:

1) Sinn UX
2) Omega Aqua Terra 39mm
3) Breitling Steelfish
4) Omega Planet Ocean 42mm
5) Panerai 112
6) Rolex (well, in all honesty, #6 was supposed to be an IWC Portuguese Chrono, but there is a certain Rolex calling to me...which would have been #7, had I acquired the IWC first)

So---I have decided on the Milgauss GV. However, there are lots of people on here that suggest going with a Sub, or a SD, or a GMT II as a first piece, then getting the GV down the road. I really dig the GV and the fact that it has such a unique uncharacteristic Rolex style to it.

SO---To all the devoted and long-time Rolex collectors/fans out here---Is there any reason that the GV SHOULD NOT be my first Rolex? Can anyone talk me out of it??

smallcandle · 23 July 2011, 12:42 AM

If you don't need a date feature and you prefer the Milguass then you should go for it.

JJL · 23 July 2011, 12:43 AM

Why would we want to talk you out of it? If that is "the one" to you, you can't ask for a better reason to buy it! Go for it and enjoy it man!

Time2time · 23 July 2011, 12:45 AM

Why would ANYONE talk you out of it?

It's a classy watch and feels nice on the wrist.

(Agree if you don't mind no-date).

texex91 · 23 July 2011, 12:47 AM

For first Rolex I would always recommend Sub, then work from there. IMHO.

Caraptor · 23 July 2011, 12:49 AM

I'd consider the need for a date feature, but other than that...
Buy what you want!! There's no template for this kind of thing.

isampark · 23 July 2011, 12:52 AM

I just love the look of an authentic Sub. The feel on the wrist, how it reflects light it just was the one for me, and that was why I got Sub for my first Rolex.

But I would also say "Why should anyone talk you out of getting a Milgauss?"

tylerad1 · 23 July 2011, 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texex91

For first Rolex I would always recommend Sub, then work from there. IMHO.

This is what I'm referring to. Everyone seems to favor getting the ever-iconic Sub as an introduction to the brand, and then moving on to other timepieces within the collections. Why do people advise against getting a more unique piece as a starting point? The Subs, SDs, and GMT Master II all have that "My-Rolex-Looks-The-Same-As-Your-Rolex-Does" feel to them.

I still want the Milgauss. TRY HARDER!!!

2th Dr · 23 July 2011, 12:54 AM

If the Milgauss is what you want, then get it! My first Rolex was a TT YM. Not exactly an icon Rolex, but who cares?

barstoolman · 23 July 2011, 12:55 AM

Who cares what other people think should be your first Rolex????? Your first Rolex should be the one you love as long as you can afford it. There is no set progression for buying a Rolex or any other brand............

BTW, the IWC Portugese Chrono wouldn't be too bad of a choice either.......that watch is stunning!!!!

tylerad1 · 23 July 2011, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by isampark

I would also say "Why should anyone talk you out of getting a Milgauss?"

Because everyone on here asks "What should I get?? I can't decide!!!" I wanted to do the opposite and see what people had to say....

slcbbrown · 23 July 2011, 12:56 AM

When folks ask, I usually recommend a DJ, Sub, or GMT. Since you're already into watches, I don't know anything except to tell you to buy what your think you'll really like. I kind of prefer the Exp to the Milgauss, but you've made a nice choice.

Time2time · 23 July 2011, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tylerad1

This is what I'm referring to. Everyone seems to favor getting the ever-iconic Sub as an introduction to the brand, and then moving on to other timepieces within the collections. Why do people advise against getting a more unique piece as a starting point? The Subs, SDs, and GMT Master II all have that "My-Rolex-Looks-The-Same-As-Your-Rolex-Does" feel to them.

I still want the Milgauss. TRY HARDER!!!

X2 very well said. Why follow the herd?

Cru Jones · 23 July 2011, 01:13 AM

you are the one that has to wear it. get what you want, period. i own an explorer ii white dial and a PAM 164. neither are "classic introductory models to the brands", but, one is a rolex and one is a panerai, and i couldn't be happier.

tylerad1 · 23 July 2011, 01:15 AM

I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers. I'm 99.9% sure that the GV is the watch for me. I was just trying to get some feedback/opinions from other enthusiasts that---maybe in the past had decided that the GV was "their one"---and then maybe fell out of love with it----If they had any sagacious advice that would convince me otherwise....

I'm not looking for anybody to say anything bad about the GV or Rolex overall. I'm just looking for people that have owned or are more educated than me on the particular timepiece that I'm considering, to speak up and give their honest opinions. For example--I read a review of the Milgauss here on TRF saying the the locking mechanism on the clasp was loose and since it wasn't spring-loaded would tend to fall ajar due to gravity when held at certain positions----This is the kind of feedback I'm looking for----the type of stuff that you can't surmise on your own in the 3 minutes that you try the unsized watch on your wrist at your local AD.......

tifosi · 23 July 2011, 01:26 AM

Get whatever you want!! Looks like you have some pretty nice divers in your collection (I'm assuming you still own those watches in the list, here). I wouldn't worry about where anyone else tells you to start. It doesn't matter. Get what sings to you. Subs are a dime a dozen. The Sub just happened to sing to me and that is why it is my one and only Rolex. If something else sang to me then I would have gotten that. There is no wrong place to start in the brand.

phampau · 23 July 2011, 01:27 AM

Go with what you like! I went with a milgauss as my first and loved it! But i eventually ended up with a sub and gmt also!

tylerad1 · 23 July 2011, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phampau

Go with what you like! I went with a milgauss as my first and loved it! But i eventually ended up with a sub and gmt also!

DANG!!!! I was crossing my fingers that this wouldn't lead to a full-blown addiction!

tylerad1 · 23 July 2011, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smallcandle

If you don't need a date feature and you prefer the Milguass then you should go for it.

I have a PAN112 that does not even have a second hand!!! The date function is definitely an ancillary function for me

HongNinja · 23 July 2011, 02:02 AM

I think everyone around these parts suggest the classic models first as your first Rolex, but that's just an opinion. If the Milgauss is what you want, if thats the one calling your name, go with your instinct.

However, these are dangerous waters when you get into Rolex. Odds are, you'll want a Sub/SD/GMT eventually. Trust me. ; )

HongNinja · 23 July 2011, 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tylerad1

DANG!!!! I was crossing my fingers that this wouldn't lead to a full-blown addiction!

Worse then heroin my friend, more expensive too, and can also lead to jail time, divorce, and trips to RA(Rolex Anonymous)

dnagwhogas · 23 July 2011, 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HongNinja

Worse then heroin my friend, more expensive too, and can also lead to jail time, divorce, and trips to RA(Rolex Anonymous)

I don't know about jail time.

The GV is an awesome piece too!

dddrees · 23 July 2011, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjl

why would we want to talk you out of it? If that is "the one" to you, you can't ask for a better reason to buy it! Go for it and enjoy it man!

x2

B. Doggy · 23 July 2011, 03:09 AM

SUB for me.

Meng16 · 23 July 2011, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

x2

X3

Go for it!!!

Mar122 · 23 July 2011, 03:59 AM

IMHO if you dont dive, the sub has no place on your wrist... Just buy what you like and I applaud your decision on a Milgausse... A unique piece that you don't see every 20 year old with some money and no clue what that watch is wearing

Just my 2 cents

Abid · 23 July 2011, 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mar122

IMHO if you dont dive, the sub has no place on your wrist... Just buy what you like and I applaud your decision on a Milgausse... A unique piece that you don't see every 20 year old with some money and no clue what that watch is wearing

Just my 2 cents

I'm hurt

Megalobyte · 23 July 2011, 04:48 AM

One thing to consider is the lume on the MG isn't that strong, the Sub's dial will be easier to read in the dark. I also feel the Sub is a flatter, more wearable watch. Then there's the much better glidelock clasp. But as has been said, buy whichever watch you think you'll appreciate the most.

victor · 23 July 2011, 05:21 AM

It makes not sense to me that your first Rolex has to be a Sub or a GMT, purchasing a Rolex is usually a big expense (or investment) so you must always purchase what ever make you happy and smile every time that you look at your wrist..

SaddleSC · 23 July 2011, 05:24 AM

Buying the watch that everyone else thinks you should buy is the quickest way to be totally disappointed with your purchase. Bottom line...buy what you like. The GV is a great watch...go for it!

23 July 2011, 12:40 AM	#1
tylerad1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: MI Posts: 812	Don't do it! Don't do it! I've slowly been working my way up the wristwatch prestige ladder, and have finally arrived upon a Rolex as my next must-have timepiece. Here's my progression: 1) Sinn UX 2) Omega Aqua Terra 39mm 3) Breitling Steelfish 4) Omega Planet Ocean 42mm 5) Panerai 112 6) Rolex (well, in all honesty, #6 was supposed to be an IWC Portuguese Chrono, but there is a certain Rolex calling to me...which would have been #7, had I acquired the IWC first) So---I have decided on the Milgauss GV. However, there are lots of people on here that suggest going with a Sub, or a SD, or a GMT II as a first piece, then getting the GV down the road. I really dig the GV and the fact that it has such a unique uncharacteristic Rolex style to it. SO---To all the devoted and long-time Rolex collectors/fans out here---Is there any reason that the GV SHOULD NOT be my first Rolex? Can anyone talk me out of it??

23 July 2011, 12:42 AM	#2
smallcandle "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Kansas Watch: 16610, Omega PO Posts: 1,898	If you don't need a date feature and you prefer the Milguass then you should go for it. __________________ Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown...

23 July 2011, 12:45 AM	#4
Time2time Banned Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: U.K Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C Posts: 2,178	Why would ANYONE talk you out of it? It's a classy watch and feels nice on the wrist. (Agree if you don't mind no-date). Last edited by Time2time; 23 July 2011 at 12:47 AM.. Reason: Miss spelling

23 July 2011, 01:26 AM	#16
tifosi "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Russ Location: Southern NJ Posts: 5,760	Get whatever you want!! Looks like you have some pretty nice divers in your collection (I'm assuming you still own those watches in the list, here). I wouldn't worry about where anyone else tells you to start. It doesn't matter. Get what sings to you. Subs are a dime a dozen. The Sub just happened to sing to me and that is why it is my one and only Rolex. If something else sang to me then I would have gotten that. There is no wrong place to start in the brand. __________________ Russ

23 July 2011, 01:27 AM	#17
phampau "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Paul Location: Florida Watch: Sub-C Posts: 460	Go with what you like! I went with a milgauss as my first and loved it! But i eventually ended up with a sub and gmt also! __________________

23 July 2011, 12:43 AM	#3
JJL "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: US Watch: 1680 Red & 16622 Posts: 2,449	Why would we want to talk you out of it? If that is "the one" to you, you can't ask for a better reason to buy it! Go for it and enjoy it man!

23 July 2011, 12:47 AM	#5
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	For first Rolex I would always recommend Sub, then work from there. IMHO.

23 July 2011, 12:49 AM	#6
Caraptor Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: me save for it. Posts: 444	I'd consider the need for a date feature, but other than that... Buy what you want!! There's no template for this kind of thing.

23 July 2011, 12:52 AM	#7
isampark Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Sam Location: Toronto, ON Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 134	I just love the look of an authentic Sub. The feel on the wrist, how it reflects light it just was the one for me, and that was why I got Sub for my first Rolex. But I would also say "Why should anyone talk you out of getting a Milgauss?"

23 July 2011, 12:54 AM	#9
2th Dr Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Mark-O! Location: Arlington, TX Watch: Rolex Posts: 12,714	If the Milgauss is what you want, then get it! My first Rolex was a TT YM. Not exactly an icon Rolex, but who cares?

23 July 2011, 12:55 AM	#10
barstoolman Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 801	Who cares what other people think should be your first Rolex????? Your first Rolex should be the one you love as long as you can afford it. There is no set progression for buying a Rolex or any other brand............ BTW, the IWC Portugese Chrono wouldn't be too bad of a choice either.......that watch is stunning!!!!

23 July 2011, 12:56 AM	#12
slcbbrown "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: steve Location: dallas area Watch: 50's TT t-bird Posts: 3,689	When folks ask, I usually recommend a DJ, Sub, or GMT. Since you're already into watches, I don't know anything except to tell you to buy what your think you'll really like. I kind of prefer the Exp to the Milgauss, but you've made a nice choice.

23 July 2011, 01:13 AM	#14
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,299	you are the one that has to wear it. get what you want, period. i own an explorer ii white dial and a PAM 164. neither are "classic introductory models to the brands", but, one is a rolex and one is a panerai, and i couldn't be happier.

23 July 2011, 01:15 AM	#15
tylerad1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: MI Posts: 812	I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers. I'm 99.9% sure that the GV is the watch for me. I was just trying to get some feedback/opinions from other enthusiasts that---maybe in the past had decided that the GV was "their one"---and then maybe fell out of love with it----If they had any sagacious advice that would convince me otherwise.... I'm not looking for anybody to say anything bad about the GV or Rolex overall. I'm just looking for people that have owned or are more educated than me on the particular timepiece that I'm considering, to speak up and give their honest opinions. For example--I read a review of the Milgauss here on TRF saying the the locking mechanism on the clasp was loose and since it wasn't spring-loaded would tend to fall ajar due to gravity when held at certain positions----This is the kind of feedback I'm looking for----the type of stuff that you can't surmise on your own in the 3 minutes that you try the unsized watch on your wrist at your local AD.......

23 July 2011, 02:02 AM	#20
HongNinja Banned Join Date: May 2011 Location: On Earth Watch: 228238, 114060 Posts: 1,347	I think everyone around these parts suggest the classic models first as your first Rolex, but that's just an opinion. If the Milgauss is what you want, if thats the one calling your name, go with your instinct. However, these are dangerous waters when you get into Rolex. Odds are, you'll want a Sub/SD/GMT eventually. Trust me. ; )

23 July 2011, 03:09 AM	#24
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	SUB for me. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

23 July 2011, 03:59 AM	#26
Mar122 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: USA Posts: 373	IMHO if you dont dive, the sub has no place on your wrist... Just buy what you like and I applaud your decision on a Milgausse... A unique piece that you don't see every 20 year old with some money and no clue what that watch is wearing Just my 2 cents

23 July 2011, 04:48 AM	#28
Megalobyte "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Ari Location: Florida Watch: ...me go broke Posts: 2,428	One thing to consider is the lume on the MG isn't that strong, the Sub's dial will be easier to read in the dark. I also feel the Sub is a flatter, more wearable watch. Then there's the much better glidelock clasp. But as has been said, buy whichever watch you think you'll appreciate the most.

23 July 2011, 05:21 AM	#29
victor Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Victor Location: Canada Watch: Rolex GMTc Posts: 77	It makes not sense to me that your first Rolex has to be a Sub or a GMT, purchasing a Rolex is usually a big expense (or investment) so you must always purchase what ever make you happy and smile every time that you look at your wrist..

23 July 2011, 05:24 AM	#30
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	Buying the watch that everyone else thinks you should buy is the quickest way to be totally disappointed with your purchase. Bottom line...buy what you like. The GV is a great watch...go for it! __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)