ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

B. Doggy · 22 August 2011, 01:16 AM

Man, I want it RIGHT NOW!!!

http://youtu.be/Ql4Jn7bnjP4

B

texex91 · 22 August 2011, 01:38 AM

I noticed this earlier this week as well. It's a beast of a watch...should be hitting late in Sept.

dddrees · 22 August 2011, 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B. Doggy

Man, I want it RIGHT NOW!!!

http://youtu.be/Ql4Jn7bnjP4

B

You need to put a block on that you tube video.

Very nice.

barstoolman · 22 August 2011, 02:03 AM

Beautiful watch but enormous!!!!!!! Would love to see it in a 44mm

dukerules · 22 August 2011, 02:53 AM

Wow. It is absolutely gorgeous! It also appears to wear smaller than other 47mm PAMs. I had been set on picking up a 233, but I'm going to keep my name on the two 372 lists I'm on.

HL65 · 22 August 2011, 03:55 AM

Love it! One of the few modern watches I would consider!

PanosI · 22 August 2011, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

Love it! One of the few modern watches I would consider!

Don't be bothered with the modern expensive watches, Ken !!! Stick with the old, cheap ones

HL65 · 22 August 2011, 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PanosI

Don't be bothered with the modern expensive watches, Ken !!! Stick with the old, cheap ones

Good advice Panos!!

mfer · 22 August 2011, 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PanosI

Don't be bothered with the modern expensive watches, Ken !!! Stick with the old, cheap ones

B. Doggy · 22 August 2011, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PanosI

Don't be bothered with the modern expensive watches, Ken !!! Stick with the old, cheap ones

Pretty soon none of the PAM line-up will be anywhere close to "cheap."

mfer · 22 August 2011, 11:31 AM

And B, you see the replies in the youtube. He has a 6.75" wrist and using the smallest hole! Ugh, this is going to be too big for me..........

---------------- small wrist curse for 47mm luminors.

jvo300 · 22 August 2011, 11:57 AM

It's too big for me also ... Unless I wore it on my right hand! Then it might look like the guy in the video. Its just darn big for the small wristies like us!

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

And B, you see the replies in the youtube. He has a 6.75" wrist and using the smallest hole! Ugh, this is going to be too big for me..........

---------------- small wrist curse for 47mm luminors.

Cru Jones · 22 August 2011, 12:21 PM

Big n beautiful.

ocwatching · 22 August 2011, 02:27 PM

Can't wait to see it on your wrist Bryan!

TopNotchChach · 22 August 2011, 04:44 PM

size does matter!

very nice watch! got to pass based on price.

B. Doggy · 23 August 2011, 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

And B, you see the replies in the youtube. He has a 6.75" wrist and using the smallest hole! Ugh, this is going to be too big for me..........

---------------- small wrist curse for 47mm luminors.

It can be done, Mik! Phil thought he couldn't do 47mm and he loved his 249!!

Shade · 23 August 2011, 02:30 AM

Bryan, I tried my friend's fiddy and I cant pull it off. I have a 249 & 232 and they both wear ok since they are thinner and the lugs are wire lugs, hence making it still look proper on a small wrist. However when I tried the fiddy on, it looked horrible on me, the tips of the lugs go over my wrist and the leather strap looks folded and hidden. Its a very nice watch, but not for skinny wrists. I wished they made it in a 44mm version..

ocwatching · 23 August 2011, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B. Doggy

It can be done, Mik! Phil thought he couldn't do 47mm and he loved his 249!!

yeah...I am at 6.5" wrist size as well...
I feel more comfortable with the 47mm Rads than the Luminors..but I will need to see how the 372 fits as everyone that has seen it says it wear smaller than a 203/127...

Hopefully the entire SIHH2011 is available at the Panerai event in mid Sept.

But this baby was BIG...

Versus the 249..

texex91 · 23 August 2011, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ocwatching

Versus the 249..

Making me

Loving that 249!

mfer · 23 August 2011, 05:05 AM

Agreed. I could pull of a 232/249 because it is thin and wire lugged. I've tried on a 127 before and it was Bee Eye Jee ----- BIG

I still am dying to try a 372 on and make the final determination myself. Hopefully someone near me will get one and I can take it for a test drive before I plunk down 10.4k.

onkyo · 23 August 2011, 05:42 AM

Awesome looking watch!

Can't wait til it hits the shelves......

jacksonian · 23 August 2011, 05:43 AM

If somebody put a 203 on my wrist, I don't care how small I was, I'd find a way to wear that thing. :-)

Trailblazer · 23 August 2011, 06:37 PM

huge crown guard there!!! I love this pam!!

Shade · 24 August 2011, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

Agreed. I could pull of a 232/249 because it is thin and wire lugged. I've tried on a 127 before and it was Bee Eye Jee ----- BIG

I still am dying to try a 372 on and make the final determination myself. Hopefully someone near me will get one and I can take it for a test drive before I plunk down 10.4k.

Ditto Mik.

I want to try one on first before buying. I really have doubts on it's wearability.

limenko · 24 August 2011, 03:30 PM

Can't wiat for this bad boy to start coming...i am 5th on my AD's list so hopefully they ship a few down under before year end.

B. Doggy · 25 August 2011, 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shade

Ditto Mik.

I want to try one on first before buying. I really have doubts on it's wearability.

I wish my AD was closer by, but being that they aren't, I've always bought my PAM's sight unseen. Worked out great so far!

I've also owned a BP and it fit perfectly, so I'm guessing the 372 will be good.

I have 7.25" wrists....

Is it here yet???......

vmm · 26 August 2011, 01:11 PM

I have 6.75" wrists also. I put my name on the waiting list but was unsure about the size. There are 2 people ahead of me... and I know how those waiting lists tend to be ignored for VIPs. I had gone away from this watch but that giant crystal and that beautiful strap. Wow! That's real PAM DNA. That video gives me hope that I might be able to pull it off. I guess we'll see! The color scheme reminds me a lot of Ken's priceless beauty.

22 August 2011, 01:16 AM	#1
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	I can't wait!!!! Man, I want it RIGHT NOW!!! http://youtu.be/Ql4Jn7bnjP4 B __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

22 August 2011, 02:53 AM	#5
dukerules "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NC, USA Posts: 681	Wow. It is absolutely gorgeous! It also appears to wear smaller than other 47mm PAMs. I had been set on picking up a 233, but I'm going to keep my name on the two 372 lists I'm on. __________________ Instagram: dukerules

22 August 2011, 03:55 AM	#6
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,005	Love it! One of the few modern watches I would consider! __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

22 August 2011, 11:31 AM	#11
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	And B, you see the replies in the youtube. He has a 6.75" wrist and using the smallest hole! Ugh, this is going to be too big for me.......... ---------------- small wrist curse for 47mm luminors. __________________ member#3242

22 August 2011, 02:27 PM	#14
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	Can't wait to see it on your wrist Bryan! __________________ too much into watches...

22 August 2011, 01:38 AM	#2
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	I noticed this earlier this week as well. It's a beast of a watch...should be hitting late in Sept.

22 August 2011, 02:03 AM	#4
barstoolman Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 801	Beautiful watch but enormous!!!!!!! Would love to see it in a 44mm

22 August 2011, 12:21 PM	#13
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,297	Big n beautiful.

22 August 2011, 04:44 PM	#15
TopNotchChach "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Near the Ocean! Watch: 116610 Posts: 1,306	size does matter! very nice watch! got to pass based on price.

23 August 2011, 02:30 AM	#17
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Bryan, I tried my friend's fiddy and I cant pull it off. I have a 249 & 232 and they both wear ok since they are thinner and the lugs are wire lugs, hence making it still look proper on a small wrist. However when I tried the fiddy on, it looked horrible on me, the tips of the lugs go over my wrist and the leather strap looks folded and hidden. Its a very nice watch, but not for skinny wrists. I wished they made it in a 44mm version.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

23 August 2011, 05:05 AM	#20
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Agreed. I could pull of a 232/249 because it is thin and wire lugged. I've tried on a 127 before and it was Bee Eye Jee ----- BIG I still am dying to try a 372 on and make the final determination myself. Hopefully someone near me will get one and I can take it for a test drive before I plunk down 10.4k. __________________ member#3242

23 August 2011, 05:42 AM	#21
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	Awesome looking watch! Can't wait til it hits the shelves......

23 August 2011, 05:43 AM	#22
jacksonian Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: NC, USA Posts: 125	If somebody put a 203 on my wrist, I don't care how small I was, I'd find a way to wear that thing. :-)

23 August 2011, 06:37 PM	#23
Trailblazer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Cab Location: A small world Watch: es Posts: 776	huge crown guard there!!! I love this pam!!

24 August 2011, 03:30 PM	#25
limenko "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Milan Location: Sydney Posts: 898	Can't wiat for this bad boy to start coming...i am 5th on my AD's list so hopefully they ship a few down under before year end.

26 August 2011, 01:11 PM	#27
vmm "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: US Posts: 171	I have 6.75" wrists also. I put my name on the waiting list but was unsure about the size. There are 2 people ahead of me... and I know how those waiting lists tend to be ignored for VIPs. I had gone away from this watch but that giant crystal and that beautiful strap. Wow! That's real PAM DNA. That video gives me hope that I might be able to pull it off. I guess we'll see! The color scheme reminds me a lot of Ken's priceless beauty. __________________ Tag 2000, Tag F1 Quartz Chronograph, Omega Deville ,Omega Seamaster, Tag Carerra Automatic, Raymond Weil Tango, Bathys Acquaculture Automatic Doxa SUB 800 Ti Pro., Bathys Benthic Titanium, Doxa 1923 Jugendstil, Doxa SUB 1000T Divingstar, Rolex 116710,Suunto T6C, PAM 113, Rolex14060m, Rolex16750.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)