The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 August 2011, 11:07 AM   #61
snog
"TRF" Member
 
snog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Megalobyte View Post
I admit, I always feel as I'm wearing my Sub C, the pearl is the most vulnerable part. On the one hand, I understand Rolex not covering it, BUT, they SHOULD design the bezel and pearl in such a way that if you do damage the pearl or the surround, it can be replaced independently of the rest of the bezel, there's no good reason I should pay, what, $1200 for a new bezel just because the pearl got hit.
agree,looking at the pics,a new pearl dropped in doesn't seem to much to ask.
Given that this is a "tool watch" it does seem parts should be slightly easier(cheaper) to replace.

Must say the OP is getting a little stick now but I think he has handled this well,he just damaged his Rolex which if his fault or not, is not easy to take,now seems to accept it was banged,lets remember he was all ready to pay the $500 before he got calls from here to ring Rolex,not sure if I would be as ready to accept it was my fault as quick,given where the dent is,I would be thinking a bang there would have resulted in the pearl dropping out straight away,not after all memory of a bang had gone away,could it not be also possible that the "dent" to have been there from the factory?....... ok probably a bang but still hard to take.
snog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:07 AM   #62
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Megalobyte View Post
I admit, I always feel as I'm wearing my Sub C, the pearl is the most vulnerable part. On the one hand, I understand Rolex not covering it, BUT, they SHOULD design the bezel and pearl in such a way that if you do damage the pearl or the surround, it can be replaced independently of the rest of the bezel, there's no good reason I should pay, what, $1200 for a new bezel just because the pearl got hit. And people wonder why some baby their Subs.
Everybody LOVES the ceramics. This is the reason that I loathe them.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:10 AM   #63
Tw2ntyTwo
"TRF" Member
 
Tw2ntyTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Kyle
Location: East Coast, USA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 74
This is one of those situations that simply turns out to be an accident caused by the wearer. Yes it is a shame that it happened, and it also sucks that it costs so much, but It is respectable that Rolex took the time to take photographs showing how they came to their diagnosis. I was going to mention earlier that you may be able to ask for photographs so you can see the damage yourself, but i was unsure if canada would provide the same treatment I've experienced in the past.

I'm glad to see that all Rolex service centers provide similar treatment. Sorry that such a thing happened, but at least Rolex is there to put the watch back in perfect condition. That's much more than i can say for any auto accident/repair popularly used for comparison.

Kyle
Tw2ntyTwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:10 AM   #64
RolexPete32
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Peter
Location: Canada
Watch: You know... Rolex
Posts: 1,520
A kind of off topic question to the poster of the thread. Do you find it akward wearing this watch in a trades related career becuase of its size sticking out while you are doing jobs etc? I was wondering?
RolexPete32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:15 AM   #65
etownrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: edmonton
Posts: 62
well i put the pictures up to show and admit that i must have bump and broke the pearl. i didnt know i was gonna be run out to town,
etownrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:18 AM   #66
etownrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: edmonton
Posts: 62
i dont do that much heavy lifting, i mostly make sure the trades show up and complete the work and deal with any issues
etownrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:24 AM   #67
Tw2ntyTwo
"TRF" Member
 
Tw2ntyTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Kyle
Location: East Coast, USA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by etownrolex View Post
well i put the pictures up to show and admit that i must have bump and broke the pearl. i didnt know i was gonna be run out to town,
Lol you're fine. Honestly looking at my little illuminating bead right now, its easy to overlook damage like that.
Tw2ntyTwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:26 AM   #68
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
Well the OP's thread is quite clear.

rolex warranty sucks

This blanket statement does not sit well with me.

My experience with the Australian RSC in Melbourne has been the very opposite. I dropped in a 14060m that was feeling very rough when winding. This was 'K' s/n that I bought from a Forum member in the States. They rang me after about two weeks and told me that they had stripped the watch and that a fault with the auto winding mechanism had been fixed. They then sent the watch registered to my office in Adelaide with no charge for the service or the postage.

Rolex service is great IMO but perhaps my approach was different?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:30 AM   #69
DHG0388
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: Phoenix AZ
Watch: 116610
Posts: 40
Poor design, IMO. First thing I noticed when I bought mine. Why does it need to stick up like that? What, did they save money by not countersinking it?

Did Rolex refuse to warranty the bracelets where the welds broke? Wouldn't that have been external?
DHG0388 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:31 AM   #70
etownrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: edmonton
Posts: 62
haha well im not changing the title just for you,
etownrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:32 AM   #71
RolexPete32
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Peter
Location: Canada
Watch: You know... Rolex
Posts: 1,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Well the OP's thread is quite clear.

rolex warranty sucks

This blanket statement does not sit well with me.

My experience with the Australian RSC in Melbourne has been the very opposite. I dropped in a 14060m that was feeling very rough when winding. This was 'K' s/n that I bought from a Forum member in the States. They rang me after about two weeks and told me that they had stripped the watch and that a fault with the auto winding mechanism had been fixed. They then sent the watch registered to my office in Adelaide with no charge for the service or the postage.

Rolex service is great IMO but perhaps my approach was different?
My warranty claims went OK as well. I had the dial replaced on my sub becuase under a 10 times loop you could see a black spot on the lume. Returned to rolex and replaced no questions asked. I also requested a time regulation as well as my watch was +4 sec a day. I was picky a couple years ago before the new feeling went away. My air-king sent back for a time regulation as well. All under the rolex warranty. I am the reason sercive costs went up
RolexPete32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:33 AM   #72
bradbyrd1110
"TRF" Member
 
bradbyrd1110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: 1110
Location: East Coast
Watch: 126710BLNR
Posts: 323
I had bought my Sub LV new last year from an AD and 9 months later, the seconds hand came completely off the stem inside the case. Don't know what happened. My AD sent it to Rolex in NY from NC and fixed the problem, even serviced it because it was running a little fast. The AD an Rolex gave me no problems. Even sent servicing paperwork. Anything worked on by Rolex should be treated this way and sent back with paperwork. If this doesnt happen for you, call Rolex Headquarters in NY and consult them. Your AD sounds shady.
__________________
126710BLNR
bradbyrd1110 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:33 AM   #73
xjeeunitx
2024 Pledge Member
 
xjeeunitx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
You know that this was not what they said so why give me this BS. Making them sound bad is not good and you need to move on IMO before someone does it for you.

I can't see why you expect to have this fixed under warranty.
If you had bought a new car and had driven it around for 8 months would you ask the dealer to repair a broken headlight under warranty because you 'hadn't hit anything'?
Of course you wouldn't.
Take it to a RSC and let them have a look at it - they might just surprise you.
Or find another Forum to whinge on.

After 8 months you broke your pearl - man up mate. Neither Rolex nor the AD are at fault.
Right on! Ask Omega Service Center for pictures and they will laugh at your request like... WTF? They'd probably hang up the phone and even if they attempted to, they wouldn't find your watch within three hours in the mess that they have. RSC takes four weeks to overhaul a watch while any other companies take 3-4 months.
xjeeunitx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:38 AM   #74
xjeeunitx
2024 Pledge Member
 
xjeeunitx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Well the OP's thread is quite clear.

rolex warranty sucks

This blanket statement does not sit well with me.

My experience with the Australian RSC in Melbourne has been the very opposite. I dropped in a 14060m that was feeling very rough when winding. This was 'K' s/n that I bought from a Forum member in the States. They rang me after about two weeks and told me that they had stripped the watch and that a fault with the auto winding mechanism had been fixed. They then sent the watch registered to my office in Adelaide with no charge for the service or the postage.

Rolex service is great IMO but perhaps my approach was different?
When I bought my Sub-C, my OCD ass went to look under the loupe. I found particles under the crystal. I bought the watch from a seller on this forum and of course, someone else's name was written on the warranty card. Seoul, Korea RSC took the watch, dissembled it, took out the dust, reassembled it, waterproof tested it and returned back to me within 30 minutes.

I went through the same ordeal for my PAM and they kept it over night for BS reasons and told me I had to pay $400 dollars for a dial that was lumed defectively. I said screw it and walked out.

RSC is top notch. Hands down.
xjeeunitx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 11:45 AM   #75
Melanotaenia
"TRF" Member
 
Melanotaenia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NYC
Watch: Explorers and Subs
Posts: 620
Given the age of the watch, Rolex should have offered to replace, but charged less than a regular replacement for say an older ceramic. It would have been good customer service on their part to offer a little bit of a discount, IMO, given the age of the watch, and the fact that the OP had just purchased it.

But, bottom lines are important to, and Rolex is a business just like any other.
Melanotaenia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 12:30 PM   #76
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melanotaenia View Post
Given the age of the watch, Rolex should have offered to replace, but charged less than a regular replacement for say an older ceramic. It would have been good customer service on their part to offer a little bit of a discount, IMO, given the age of the watch, and the fact that the OP had just purchased it.

But, bottom lines are important to, and Rolex is a business just like any other.
If I'm not mistaken, a new ceramic bezel is around $1200, didn't they agree to charge him only 5?
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 12:35 PM   #77
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by etownrolex View Post
haha well im not changing the title just for you,
I can organise that for you.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 12:47 PM   #78
michel33
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: france
Posts: 796
Wow, when you think that replacing an older aluminium bezel insert did cost almost nothing.... And that you could replace the pearl itself for really nothing.....

I cannot understand why they did not manage to build a ceramic bezel with a replaceable pearl..... Not a tool watch anymore, for sure....
michel33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2011, 12:59 PM   #79
SUBversive
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by etownrolex View Post
i dont do that much heavy lifting, i mostly make sure the trades show up and complete the work and deal with any issues
After trying to get "trades" to work on my addition, or even return a phone call, I would say your job is some heavy lifting!
SUBversive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2011, 12:37 AM   #80
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHG0388 View Post
Poor design, IMO. First thing I noticed when I bought mine. Why does it need to stick up like that? What, did they save money by not countersinking it?

Did Rolex refuse to warranty the bracelets where the welds broke? Wouldn't that have been external?
Why does the bezel pearl stick out so much? It's sitting out there just begging to be hit by something. Poor design.

__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13
mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2011, 01:55 AM   #81
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Well, I, for one, am glad that you have the issue sorted out.. What does suck is that you have to pay another 500 clams to fix your watch..

But sometimes we have a good day, and sometimes we have a bad day..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.