ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 September 2011, 10:58 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
|
Sorry, no, they have two CEOs. My mungling of the language.
They did, however, have THREE Chief Operating Officers, and it appears they are now down to two: http://www.rim.com/newsroom/mediaexecutive/index.shtml These are the type of things that cause anyone experienced to shake their head sadly. |
14 September 2011, 02:12 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
I have one on order. I got a Verizon Torch (no keyboard) Friday and was done with it by 2pm Saturday. I also need a real keyboard. As an IT Director my email is my life. I do take a lot of pics, so the camera needs to be excellent. Apps and web browsing aren't important. I don't want to be that "into" a phone.
I agree that RIM is in serious trouble. I just want one more BB before I am forced to go Droid or (gulp) some other company. Who knows. The smartest thing RIM could do is begin supporting Activesync like droid and iphone. Wearing my IT hat, I think the BB method of doing email is nearly dead. We are moving to the "everyone already has a smartphone" model where we support what you bring. Overwhelmingly the choice is droid or iphone. BES Express eliminates the need to buy client licenses for Blackberry, so we keep that around. If we were still buying licenses it would probably be history. I don't know what's on the horizon, but I wish someone would come along and replace BB with a non-droid activesync touchscreen phone with a keyboard. I was a Treo guy from the beginning and hated to see it go. The Palm Pre was pretty cool, but not quite there. |
16 September 2011, 11:08 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
|
RIMM's earnings news today was horrible, as expected. Units down, sales down, gross profit down, net income down.
Stock is being hammered overnight. The two co-CEOs offered assurance that they'll discount the current models enough to keep loyal users, and the new QNX OS models will be a huge hit in time to save the year. Riiiiight. |
16 September 2011, 11:23 AM | #64 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Good news!
I'll be due for a new phone in June 2012, so I'll be getting one of the QNX phones. I'm not too hyped up about it, because my 9650 does plenty enough to keep me happy most of the time and actually, the browser has been working just fine for the sites I visit most. I have a buddy who has an iPhone and every time we get together, he spends the whole time shoving it in my face trying to impress me. I must admit that it does a lot of things, but basically, it does very little that interests me. The bottom line is that I don't want a $100+ phone bill every month and any iPhone or Android is a one way ticket to enormous phone bills. That's why they were invented. For about $70 a month, I've got plenty of phone. In a typical month I use well under 200 minutes, send just over 250 texts and use less that 50MB of data. I'm always interested in new tech, but I'm not much interested in a device that is basically a pipeline to my wallet.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
18 September 2011, 03:58 AM | #65 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: HK
Posts: 81
|
nice!!!!!!
|
18 September 2011, 04:42 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near the Ocean!
Watch: 116610
Posts: 1,306
|
does the web browser still suck?
|
18 September 2011, 05:44 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 4,081
|
No idea, almost never use it.
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛ |
18 September 2011, 12:03 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,683
|
Wow, just now saw this thread again after it was bumped up and the comments after my last post. Obviously RIM was overpriced at $130 and has settled where it should be based off the volume of business and profitability it has and will continue to have (very arguably undervalued).
Compare RIM to lets say BofA who is obviously depressed in this market with 10000x the assets, PPI, etc in this unstable market trading at ~7. Yeah, I back my statement that RIM is doing just fine. Just because a company is not at its high during, for all practical purposes, a near second recession doesn't mean it's anywhere near closing its doors or even in bad shape. |
18 September 2011, 12:28 PM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
|
Quote:
|
|
18 September 2011, 12:33 PM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
Quote:
|
|
18 September 2011, 12:35 PM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,683
|
|
18 September 2011, 11:16 PM | #72 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
|
Quote:
Absolutely astounding... well, if you liked it at $140 before the wheels came off, and at $80 a year ago, and at $24 now, imagine the love in a month! |
|
18 September 2011, 11:39 PM | #73 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,683
|
Quote:
I don't know why it's crazy to believe someone liked it at all those trading levels? I liked LVS at $140 (same time RIMM topped out) with the Macau growth, I liked it when it was at $2, and I like it now at $50. Same holds true for my BAC reference earlier...it's trading at a fraction of it's high, is it astounding to believe that it's still a good buy or is this just another 'the wheels coming off' scenario with no end in sight? |
|
20 September 2011, 03:54 AM | #74 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
|
Quote:
BAC is pretty opaque to me. If I knew they had the guts to file for bankruptcy on Countrywide, I'd be all over it. No idea if they do or not. BAC's business model, products, etc. remain viable, so the price reflects the markets distaste for banks plus the undigested toxic assets. BAC and RIMM would be similar if all phone manufacturer stocks were tanking. If JPM and C were at all-time highs with BAC in single digits, we'd know BAC was judged uniquely low value by the market. Some comments today on RIM from here I'm not finding anyone who has confidence in either of the two co-CEOs, and I see RIM as depressed in a thriving sector unlike BAC, depressed in a depressed sector. But again... I'm not even an amateur stock picker, so who knows. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.