ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 October 2011, 12:35 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Asia
Watch: PP AP PAM ROLEX
Posts: 495
|
my first PAM was 241. I worn it for 2 years and I needed something bigger.
After 241, 359 was the only automatic Panerai. I think manual movement is CLASSIC. I think 111/112/000/005 are the best to start. Price in secondary market is quite fair. BTW, congrats in advance. |
21 October 2011, 06:09 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
|
005 all the way!
|
21 October 2011, 06:49 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
|
21 October 2011, 06:56 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
|
nope....sausage dial :)
|
21 October 2011, 06:56 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
|
cheaper than the 111 too...
|
21 October 2011, 11:17 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
Mine was 000, then switched to 111 in just a week time... it really depends on what type sings to you louder....
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
22 October 2011, 12:44 PM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: DC
Posts: 18
|
I am so in this boat too... I've been lurking and browsing for 2 months now. I like the 210, 177 and the 312/359, which I realize covers a lot of different styles and price ranges. The look of the leather band is more appealing to my significant other, who wants to help me get my first mechanical watch. I want to wear and not worry so I keep going back to the 16570 explorer II. I don't know how you guys do it, but $5000 is my limit and that itself can buy a lot of other fun and useful things. It's been an enjoyable learning curve and as a mech. eng. I really appreciate the function aspect of these pieces.
|
22 October 2011, 09:19 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Sean
Location: New York
Watch: 249 & SD
Posts: 176
|
On Thursday, I went to a few stores and tried on every rolex and panerai I could find. Since before purchasing the pam104 a few months ago I had originally intended on getting a rolex, and thought I'd finally go this route.
FYI, I sold the pam104 earlier this week. But after owning the panerai I could not get past the busy dial and overall small appearance of the Rolexes and the cyclops, while better than the panerai, still detracted from the overall appearance of the watch, imo. So I decided to get a panerai. After trying on quite a few the radiomir was my favorite. It's much more comfortable and lighter weight on my wrist than the pam104 was, and I still thought the luminor manual winds were a bit bulky to my liking. they were better than the automatic pam104 though. Yesterday a fellow paneristi offered first class service and delivered me a brand new 380N to my door, and he surprised me with a Panerai T-shirt as an added bonus. The first winding was a joy, and I'm glad I went with the manual. Here's a poor photo from a bar last night: |
23 October 2011, 01:12 PM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
First was a 111G and its still here in the family!
|
23 October 2011, 02:07 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
|
|
23 October 2011, 02:08 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
|
23 October 2011, 06:05 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,175
|
Another noob question on PAMs..
With PAMs serial (eg: J, K, N), how can I differentiate the year they are manufacture? Do they vary in prices as well? |
23 October 2011, 10:46 PM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Sean
Location: New York
Watch: 249 & SD
Posts: 176
|
Quote:
Year Designator Panerai watches are dated by a letter that appears before the production number. No Letter - 1997 A - 1998 B - 1999 C - 2000 D - 2001 E - 2002 F - 2003 G - 2004 H - 2005 I - 2006 J - 2007 K - 2008 L - 2009 M - 2010 N - 2011 |
|
23 October 2011, 10:48 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,175
|
|
23 October 2011, 11:40 PM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: chris
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: Milgauss, PAM 359
Posts: 390
|
|
24 October 2011, 10:13 AM | #46 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: DC
Posts: 18
|
|
29 October 2011, 07:05 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Tim
Location: Worcestershire,UK
Watch: Coke 16710
Posts: 894
|
I agree that trying all models on is vital. I bought a 49 as my first PAM 4 years ago and still looks as good as the day I bought it. I think the 40mm luminor wears bigger than 40mm due to the crown protector. any choice is a good one tho.
|
29 October 2011, 07:08 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
I went with the 210, I am liking it!
|
29 October 2011, 07:22 AM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 801
|
Have you seen their list prices lately????? They are hardly the best watch for the price nowadays. Love them still but new ones from an AD are at prices I just won't pay.....just my .02
|
29 October 2011, 07:40 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
|
29 October 2011, 07:46 AM | #51 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
I love them both and now have both, but I would say first high-end watch should be a Rolex. but that is just me. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.