The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 November 2011, 02:04 AM   #91
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
It is not a status symbol. The only thing it symbolizes (besides taste) is that you gave a few bucks to another person or business.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 02:07 AM   #92
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
I agree with the poster that said noone notices his Patek.
A status symbol has to be "Recognized" or it isn't a status symbol.

Rolex is recognized due to quality, hype, marketing..."fill in your own word" but that is why it gets noticed and gives STATUS.

Not saying it's right or wrong...just my 2cents.




Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 02:08 AM   #93
ArcticMoose
"TRF" Member
 
ArcticMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
It is not a status symbol. The only thing it symbolizes (besides taste) is that you gave a few bucks to another person or business.
A status symbol is a perceived visible, external denotation of one's social position and perceived indicator of economic or social status.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_symbol

How is a Rolex not an external denotation of economic status? Calling $8000+ "a few bucks" is a hard kick to the groin of quite a few people, you need to get out more.
ArcticMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 02:59 AM   #94
Tunacan26
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Florida
Watch: Hulk, DJ, Bluesy
Posts: 1,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by capote View Post
One word: Marketing
x2

Make that, "great" marketing....
Tunacan26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 04:02 AM   #95
chronoman
"TRF" Member
 
chronoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Watch: 116520 & 3570.50
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticMoose View Post
How is a Rolex not an external denotation of economic status?
Simple, i wear it and nobody notices.
I think there should be intent in there, i.e
Do you wear it to be noticed?
I do not. I just appreciate kinetic art.

i suppose there's status percieved as well. But i can't account for how someone else thinks.
chronoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 04:20 AM   #96
handsfull
"TRF" Member
 
handsfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticMoose View Post
A status symbol is a perceived visible, external denotation of one's social position and perceived indicator of economic or social status.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_symbol

How is a Rolex not an external denotation of economic status? Calling $8000+ "a few bucks" is a hard kick to the groin of quite a few people, you need to get out more.
Anyone who reads the definition and DOESN'T believe a Rolex watch fits..... might be out of touch with reality!
handsfull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 04:46 AM   #97
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by rossi46 View Post


Some of you really need to pick up a newspaper. "Most people" are either: tens of thousands of dollars underwater on their mortgage, have tens of thousands of dollars in credit card/student debt, or are working extra hours/a second job just to pay the bills.

There is some serious cognitive bias going on this this thread...
As I said before it is all in how you save your money, I could have got a Rolex in high school from working at Mc Donald’s part time, if I did not blow all my money on partying and girls.

4 years of working part time putting $100 bucks away a week (that is over 20K in the 4 years). That would have paid for a nice watch!
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 05:14 AM   #98
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticMoose View Post
A status symbol is a perceived visible, external denotation of one's social position and perceived indicator of economic or social status.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_symbol

How is a Rolex not an external denotation of economic status? Calling $8000+ "a few bucks" is a hard kick to the groin of quite a few people, you need to get out more.
Right, so you never heard of debt? Of people taking up credit, making 540 payments, or simply not going out in order to buy a watch (or whatever they fancy)?

A watch or any other "external denotation" does not indicate much about actual economic status. More than we'd like to admit, people bankroll lifestyles beyond their means through debt.

As I said, the only thing it indicates is the amount of money that left your account and went into somebody else's (or debt you keep on piling up), improving the economic status of the seller in the process ... now, if that offends your sensibilities, well ...

Oh, and by the way ... spare me the "you need to get out more" routine.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 05:20 AM   #99
Beelzy
"TRF" Member
 
Beelzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cen-Cal
Watch: 16610
Posts: 869
Well schucks!.......Here all this time I thought a Rolex was a Phallic symbol. LOL!!!
Beelzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 05:27 AM   #100
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
This is getting interesting. Fair points people.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 05:32 AM   #101
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post

Not saying it's right or wrong...just my 2cents.

Shouldn't that be 50 cents ?
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 05:36 AM   #102
StarSovereign
"TRF" Member
 
StarSovereign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Erik
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 116234, 116710LN
Posts: 936
Um...simple: They cost a lot of money and people KNOW they cost a lot of money...
__________________
Submariner 116610LN - Black Dial & Stainless Steel
DateJust 116234 - White Stick Dial & Roulette Wheel
GMT-Master II 116710LN - Black Dial & Green "Fouth Hand"
StarSovereign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 05:48 AM   #103
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshwatchman View Post
Shouldn't that be 50 cents ?
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 06:49 AM   #104
handsfull
"TRF" Member
 
handsfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
LOL....many people are taking this personally.

This isn't a debate of how can we afford our watches and why the country is in debt because of bad spending/saving habits.

The question is....is Rolex a 'status symbol'. By merriam/websters definition, that is a very loud 'YES'.

Whether or not its your 'intent' to wear it so others can see it or not, OR whether 'some' people (haven't ran into a person who doesnt know yet!) don't even know what it is....is irrelevant....and makes absolutely zero impact on what the definition of a status symbol is.
handsfull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 06:52 AM   #105
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshwatchman View Post
Shouldn't that be 50 cents ?
Fiddy Cent!
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 06:53 AM   #106
ArcticMoose
"TRF" Member
 
ArcticMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by chronoman View Post
Simple, i wear it and nobody notices.
I think there should be intent in there, i.e
Just because you do not use it as one does not mean that it is not a status symbol in most eyes.

There a plenty of pure enthusiasts who enjoy the history, engineering and ability of a Porsche or Lamborghini as well, but you cannot say with a straight face that they are not seen as status symbols.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chronoman View Post
Do you wear it to be noticed?
Not usually, but I'll admit it has happened that I have chosen something recognizable when planning to visit a car dealership. Since I tend to look like a homeless drunk I have found it quite helpful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chronoman View Post
I just appreciate kinetic art.
As do I. And probably even a majority of the TRF members. However, we are in a very small minority as far as Rolex buyers are concerned.

I'm sure you've seen the story here about the manager who told an employee (who was wearing a DRSD) "that's a cool watch, if you work hard maybe someday you'll be able to afford a nice new one, like mine".

I just image-google "status symbol". Mercedes didn't show up until number 21, number 11 is a private jet, Louis Vuitton made it to number 7, number 3 is a comic about Montblanc. And, you guessed it, first place goes to Rolex.

The second sentence on Wikipedia's Rolex page starts "Rolex watches are popularly regarded as status symbols". There are four references to back it up, from CNN, TIME, New York Times and The Guardian.

Even disregarding all this, could you please explain the huge market for fakes? Why would anyone with an appreciation of mechanical timepieces wear a terrible tinny piece of crap built to look like a Rolex, instead of one of the many very nice brands priced similarly to the Rolex fakes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Right, so you never heard of debt?
Of course I have.

Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
A watch or any other "external denotation" does not indicate much about actual economic status. More than we'd like to admit, people bankroll lifestyles beyond their means through debt.
You know that. I know that.

But why do you think anyone would bury themselves in it to buy a watch? Or a shirt with a particular logo on it that costs ten times more than a very similar one without it? Or why Mercedes can sell a lesser-equipped car with a lower quality feel for twice as much as similar Toyota?

Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Oh, and by the way ... spare me the "you need to get out more" routine.
Too late for that, I'm afraid.
ArcticMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 07:02 AM   #107
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticMoose View Post
Just because you do not use it as one does not mean that it is not a status symbol in most eyes.

There a plenty of pure enthusiasts who enjoy the history, engineering and ability of a Porsche or Lamborghini as well, but you cannot say with a straight face that they are not seen as status symbols.



Not usually, but I'll admit it has happened that I have chosen something recognizable when planning to visit a car dealership. Since I tend to look like a homeless drunk I have found it quite helpful.



As do I. And probably even a majority of the TRF members. However, we are in a very small minority as far as Rolex buyers are concerned.

I'm sure you've seen the story here about the manager who told an employee (who was wearing a DRSD) "that's a cool watch, if you work hard maybe someday you'll be able to afford a nice new one, like mine".

I just image-google "status symbol". Mercedes didn't show up until number 21, number 11 is a private jet, Louis Vuitton made it to number 7, number 3 is a comic about Montblanc. And, you guessed it, first place goes to Rolex.

The second sentence on Wikipedia's Rolex page starts "Rolex watches are popularly regarded as status symbols". There are four references to back it up, from CNN, TIME, New York Times and The Guardian.

Even disregarding all this, could you please explain the huge market for fakes? Why would anyone with an appreciation of mechanical timepieces wear a terrible tinny piece of crap built to look like a Rolex, instead of one of the many very nice brands priced similarly to the Rolex fakes?



Of course I have.



You know that. I know that.

But why do you think anyone would bury themselves in it to buy a watch? Or a shirt with a particular logo on it that costs ten times more than a very similar one without it? Or why Mercedes can sell a lesser-equipped car with a lower quality feel for twice as much as similar Toyota?



Too late for that, I'm afraid.
Good answers. I guess PERCEIVED is the key word here ... Peace
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 07:09 AM   #108
Wehtiko
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbits76 View Post
It aint a status symbol in my house. My wife still thinks I'm a moron!

J
Gee, at least you had to get a watch for your wife to consider you a moron...
Wehtiko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 07:13 AM   #109
ArcticMoose
"TRF" Member
 
ArcticMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Good answers. I guess PERCEIVED is the key word here ... Peace
Aw, I had set aside important things for a nice evening of online confrontation.

(Speaking of which, could someone with an iPhone 4S try asking Siri to "please argue on the internet so I don't have to"?)
ArcticMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 08:16 AM   #110
gargamel647
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: Ho
Posts: 679
Bond. James Bond
gargamel647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 01:24 PM   #111
vmm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Posts: 171
We may not think of them as status symbols, but in my mind they clearly are. Watches that cost from 5-25k, are recognizable and often regarded in the same vein as cars such as Porsche. There's no question that there are 500k watches out there and most people would have no clue. True, as a WIS on this board, most would consider their love of Rolex as an appreciation of the history, workmanship, and innovation. We would not consider them status symbols, though the great majority of the people out there would. It's a sign that you've made it (or have a lot of credit card debt ). This reminds of a conversation I've seen on both the M3 forum and 6speed online (I would think at least a few on here probably frequent those boards). The discussions centered on whether or the cars were exotic. People for the most part stated that their cars were not and that that was part of the reason they had stayed away from Lambo or Ferrari land. Interesting parallels.
__________________
Tag 2000, Tag F1 Quartz Chronograph, Omega Deville ,Omega Seamaster, Tag Carerra Automatic,
Raymond Weil Tango, Bathys Acquaculture Automatic
Doxa SUB 800 Ti Pro., Bathys Benthic Titanium, Doxa 1923 Jugendstil, Doxa SUB 1000T Divingstar, Rolex 116710,Suunto T6C, PAM 113, Rolex14060m, Rolex16750.
vmm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 02:06 PM   #112
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
It's pretty simple to me. 

If any object can be said to be a status symbol, it has to be, a nice/expensive house, car/boat/plane, and yes, an expensive watch or jewelry. There are others too, like a $90,000 Hermes purse, but I'd say these are the major status symbols, an expensive watch is certainly one of the commonly looked at "status symbols", like it or not. Maybe it shouldn't be, maybe there shouldn't be status symbols, but the reality is, there are. 

So, if we agree that a high end, expensive watch is indeed a status symbol, then it follows Rolex is perhaps THE best example! Simply because despite what we as WIS know, that Rolex is entry level in terms of cost, a Rolex, because of terrific marketing, is THE most recognizable expensive watch. The layman, which really is most people, instantly sees "expensive", when they see a Rolex, they likely have little idea what it actually costs, only that it's a lot. It's ironic that they have it bass ackwards, they think it costs a fortune, and isn't a quality watch, when in fact, they're relatively inexpensive, and are outstanding watches. 

Show a Rolex and a Patek to a non WIS, ie. 99% of the world, and the Rolex will be seen as the expensive/impressive watch, a Patek Nautilus for example, will tend to be unimpressive and overlooked, so, if a watch can impart status to its wearer, which do you think it will be? It matters little whether you personally agree with the notion of status symbols, they do exist, like it or not. A watch nobody knows is expensive isn't going to really be a status symbol. 

So, right or wrong, despite many higher end watches worth 20 times what a Rolex is, worn out there for all to see, it's the Rolex that is most easily identified as the "expensive watch", which if you're shallow enough, might impress you. :)

If you were in a very high brow club, where nice watches abound, and the typical member knows a Rolex from a Patek, a Rolex would perhaps be a negative status symbol, as those people might know they're relatively cheap compared to PP, AP, etc. 

But 99% of the time you're around people who associate a Rolex with money, wealth, and some I suppose would perceive and assume a certain status/wealth of its owner, whereas a Patek Nautilus, at over twice the price of a Daytona won't impress anyone, outside a select few. Therefore, if we agree expensive watches, right or wrong can be status symbols, Rolex is certainly one of, if not THE best, of them. 
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 02:20 PM   #113
LightOnAHill
"TRF" Member
 
LightOnAHill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: YG DD lchdp
Posts: 2,963
Icon14

Quote:
Originally Posted by feras View Post
I think Rolex is a symbol or an indicator for success. Imo I believe that it's a reward and not a purchase, a reward for a success story you've been through financially or at any other life aspects



Agree!
LightOnAHill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 02:29 PM   #114
sherwin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Perth/Singapore
Posts: 1,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Megalobyte View Post
...If you were in a very high brow club, where nice watches abound, and the typical member knows a Rolex from a Patek, a Rolex would perhaps be a negative status symbol, as those people might know they're relatively cheap compared to PP, AP, etc. ... 
And where do you stop comparing? Like it or not, there is always someone else with the bigger/better <insert item here/>.
__________________
Want to Buy:SS GMT black;116509 WG Daytona Metrorite
sherwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 05:08 PM   #115
nowzen
"TRF" Member
 
nowzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 741
Of course it's a status symbol...
to everybody except the astute watch connoisseurs on TRF.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
nowzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 05:26 PM   #116
andrew79
"TRF" Member
 
andrew79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
it is status symbol for ignorant people... not for us here...
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera
Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570
Panerai 111 , 232
andrew79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 07:01 PM   #117
kkwn98
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew79 View Post
it is status symbol for ignorant people... not for us here...
Why? What is wrong with it being viewed as a status symbol, whether by "us" or "them"?
kkwn98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 07:21 PM   #118
CH69
"TRF" Member
 
CH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 131
It is brand image.

Rolex achieve it status as a benchmark of success because of it's brand image amongst the "fine watch" class ranks it higher than the common known branded watch such as Tag or Omega etc (sorry) and although it may be below brands such as AP, PP etc in terms of class.....these brands are really not that commonly known to pple having no interest in watches, so thus rolex is establish as "the crown for every achievement".

Whether is it marketing, pricing, history, quality etc that achieve this brand image, is debatable...
CH69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2011, 08:11 PM   #119
ExpII
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: chris
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: Milgauss, PAM 359
Posts: 390
Status goes both ways

My brother thinks I'm nuts for spending more than a couple of hundred bucks on a watch. Some folks at work think I make too much $$$.

I just like the watch, the fine details, the history and all that jazz. More importantly, I don't give a $hit what other people think. I'm like the WIS equivalent of the Honey Badger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7wHMg5Yjg
ExpII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2011, 01:06 AM   #120
handsfull
"TRF" Member
 
handsfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmm View Post
The discussions centered on whether or the cars were exotic. People for the most part stated that their cars were not and that that was part of the reason they had stayed away from Lambo or Ferrari land. Interesting parallels.
I'd say this is an example of the vast disconnect between the have's and the have-not's. What many people strongly 'believe' to be true and what is reality are two different things. Being engrossed in a certain culture, or simply being rich/affluent allows you to apply the optional blinders to reality.
handsfull is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.