The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 September 2007, 02:59 AM   #1
docmfg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 162
Question about Luminova on new SS SUB with Date Z series

Hello to all. I am new to this forum. I have recently purchased my first Rolex, a Z series SS Sub with date. My question is about the illumination form the Luminova. When I come in from the outside on a sunny day the illumination is very strong but eventually fades. It is hard to tell time in the middle of the night. I researched the forum and some have said that the illumination had been improved on the newer watches. Do you guys thinks this is a warranty issue or is this weak illumination normal for a watch that is less than 2 weeks old.
Thanks.
docmfg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 03:07 AM   #2
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Welcome to TRF!

That is quite normal with Superluminova

Here is a little story about Superluminova and its predecessor, Tritium.

I assume you would know about the qualities of Tritium? Tritium was used up until about 1998. The dials with Tritium would be marked "T SWISS T" at six o'clock.

The "T's" in mean Tritium which is a mildly radioactive substance (beta waves) that has a halflife of approx. 12-13 years. Tritium did not glow on its own, but via phospher paint that acted as a catalysator the the Tritium to glow.

Tritium would "degrade" (due to its radioactive halflife cyclus) and would after about 12-13 years hardly glow at all.

SuperLuminova, however, has (as far as we know until know since 1998!) no degression in terms of glow, but needs light to glow, and tends to glow for a shorter period (during the night/in the dark, not in terms of any "halflife") than Tritium did.

In this link you can read more about luminousity of Rolex dials: Luminous Material. CLICK TO READ!

__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 03:19 AM   #3
wandyprawira
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: hub
Posts: 520
The illumination on that model and other models, except the ones with maxi dial, just sucks. No, you can't make a warranty claim about it because it's just what it is (due to design limitation). Even if it's replaced by a new set of markers but of the same type, it will be just like that.
__________________
wandyprawira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 03:21 AM   #4
docmfg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 162
Thank you. I am new to the world of Rolex and can tell you the more I read the threads in this forum the more watches I want to purchase, but must fight the temptation for now. I read somewhere on the internet that when you wind a Rolex it should not make any clicking sounds. When I wind my Sub I can hear very fine clicks and even feel them. I would assume this is normal? BTW I purchased my watch at a Ben Bridges.
docmfg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 03:30 AM   #5
wandyprawira
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: hub
Posts: 520
Clicking is absolutely normal. That way we know that we're winding.

Btw, welcome to the forum. However, the longer you stay the lesser your bank statement balance everytime you see it.
__________________
wandyprawira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 03:31 AM   #6
JCirillo
"TRF" Member
 
JCirillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: John Cirillo
Location: Manhattan
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 119
Welcome - clicks normal when winding, you got the real deal if you bought it at BB, no worries.

I have same watch, lume sucks. My 12 year old Omega SMP glows better. But it aint a rollie....

welcome to TRF
JCirillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 03:36 AM   #7
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
Welcome to TRF.

Don't sweat the small stuff....life's too short..

Enjoy one of the premier icon watches in the world..


Tools is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 04:07 AM   #8
jhelms
"TRF" Member
 
jhelms's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: GA, USA
Watch: SS Sub / SS DJ
Posts: 221
Agreed, the lume on my ~5y/o sub performs much the same.

I have a super luminova video in my signature that I did a couple of months ago also...
__________________
His - SS Submariner Date
Hers - SS Oyster Date, Blue Dial
"SS Daytona Waiting List" Member NO LONGER!

Last edited by jhelms; 15 September 2007 at 06:46 AM..
jhelms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 07:36 AM   #9
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by docmfg View Post
Hello to all. I am new to this forum. I have recently purchased my first Rolex, a Z series SS Sub with date. My question is about the illumination form the Luminova. When I come in from the outside on a sunny day the illumination is very strong but eventually fades. It is hard to tell time in the middle of the night. I researched the forum and some have said that the illumination had been improved on the newer watches. Do you guys thinks this is a warranty issue or is this weak illumination normal for a watch that is less than 2 weeks old.
Thanks.
Hey doc,
Most of the "improvement" comes from the increased surface area as opposed to the smaller markers found on the current sub series.
As has been stated luminova needs an outside source to "charge" as opposed to the older tritium dials. The best source generally is felt to be UV rays.
Older trit. dials either T SWISS T or SWISS T<25 (less that 25 milicuries of tritium --beta radiation) were "always on".
NOTEWORTHY; trit. dials were composed of three components.
1. tritium--the exciting agent.
2. phosphors--the glow part.
3. the bonding agent--about 90% of what you see.
While tritium indeed has a half-life of about 12.5 years or so, Many feel that over the years Rolex played with the mixture. Many collectors experience glow from vintage pieces 35 to 40 years old and older. Interestingly this occurs more with gloss dialed watches prior to Rolex's move to the matt dialed pieces .
When one compares standard luminova dials vs. maxi-dials the difference in surface area is apparant.


More interesting is the difference in the mixture from one brand to another.

Omega vs, Rolex maxi,

mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 07:48 AM   #10
ron17402
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Ron
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Watch: 116710
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
Hey doc,
Most of the "improvement" comes from the increased surface area as opposed to the smaller markers found on the current sub series.
As has been stated luminova needs an outside source to "charge" as opposed to the older tritium dials. The best source generally is felt to be UV rays.
Older trit. dials either T SWISS T or SWISS T<25 (less that 25 milicuries of tritium --beta radiation) were "always on".
NOTEWORTHY; trit. dials were composed of three components.
1. tritium--the exciting agent.
2. phosphors--the glow part.
3. the bonding agent--about 90% of what you see.
While tritium indeed has a half-life of about 12.5 years or so, Many feel that over the years Rolex played with the mixture. Many collectors experience glow from vintage pieces 35 to 40 years old and older. Interestingly this occurs more with gloss dialed watches prior to Rolex's move to the matt dialed pieces .
When one compares standard luminova dials vs. maxi-dials the difference in surface area is apparant.


More interesting is the difference in the mixture from one brand to another.

Omega vs, Rolex maxi,


Great pics!!! I was wonderiong the same thing about lume on my 116710.
ron17402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 07:54 AM   #11
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Welcome to TRF.

Don't sweat the small stuff....life's too short..

Enjoy one of the premier icon watches in the world..


Too true. Don't sweat the small stuff. That said, I find the lume on both my Z series Rolexes is very bright and that if I go to bed at 23:00 and get up at 05:00, I can easily read the dial.

Just me.

Chris
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 10:28 AM   #12
SSD
"TRF" Member
 
SSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
My 16610 is the same way as Chris'. The new Z-series lume seems to be brightest at lights out, then settles in for the rest of the night. I'm sure the dark-adaptation of our eyes playes a part, but your lume sounds just fine. Welcome to TRF, enjoy the classic Rolex of all time. It seems our hobby's already got ya good!
__________________


SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953
TRF Member # 5464

SSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 04:09 PM   #13
alglez
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: houston
Watch: TT blue sub
Posts: 252
OMEGA glows nicer then rolex!!!
alglez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 04:22 PM   #14
BiG JeEzY
"TRF" Member
 
BiG JeEzY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
The lume on Rolexes are indeed bright but very short. In about an hour, my watches lose almost all their lume when I charge the lume then leave the watches in a dark area afterwards.

Its okay though, usually I turn to my cellphone to get the time in dark areas. However when I watch a movie at a theater, the lume is almost faded but I can still make out the time using the brightness of the movie screen.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001)
-Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978)
-Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991)
-Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique
-Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial
BiG JeEzY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2007, 07:04 PM   #15
nimm12
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: singapore
Posts: 101
if you are overly-concerned about brightness of the indices , get a Ball watch , they glow like crazy
nimm12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.