ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 September 2007, 11:24 AM | #1 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Big WAtches..How big is too big.
Are big watches getting out of hand..
Do they look good on a wrist......would you wear one ? I think it's getting crazy. Take this one for example. the Swiss Military CX 12,000. People are wearing it around as a sport watch....Is this right ?? |
28 September 2007, 11:33 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
|
Check out the bling watches that go around these days, even bigger.
And I who thought my Omega Megaquartz 2.4 was big a couple of years ago, now it looks tiny. |
28 September 2007, 11:52 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Or how about a 60mm wrist compass to go with your watch..
|
28 September 2007, 11:57 AM | #4 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Personally, I feel every wrist is suited for a certain sized watch.
I find the 40 mm pin-perfect!! Someone with a small wrist might be very comfortable with either a 34 mm DATE, Air-King or a 36 mm DJ. I think in the end, size of the wrist really matters!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 September 2007, 12:02 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
How about this dainty horological masterpiece next to my Sub? It weighs in a couple of grams more than an '07 Honda Accord, and will stop a cruise missile dead in it's tracks.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
28 September 2007, 12:14 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Watch: it, Bubba!
Posts: 6,271
|
|
28 September 2007, 12:33 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Ken
Location: toronto
Watch: 18K YG Day Date
Posts: 2,985
|
i tt sub would be big enough for me
__________________
DAUNWAUN |
28 September 2007, 12:42 PM | #8 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 September 2007, 01:39 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
I just couldn't help it
It's not how big it is, its how you use it.
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
28 September 2007, 01:50 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
Omega PO in 45.5mm is too large ... and I have big wrists.Talk about topheavy ...and then some say the SD is topheavy
|
28 September 2007, 06:05 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
|
|
28 September 2007, 07:16 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 750
|
My wife tells me that size is not important.
__________________
The Exclusive 4000ft Club. |
28 September 2007, 07:17 PM | #13 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
I like the swiss mlitary it has character
|
28 September 2007, 07:27 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
|
|
28 September 2007, 07:48 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
28 September 2007, 07:49 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
I say that any watch beyond 44 mm is too large.
Anything bigger than 44 mm, it should be called a "wrist clock" instead of a "wrist watch."
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
28 September 2007, 07:55 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 750
|
No, but her eyes where watering.
__________________
The Exclusive 4000ft Club. |
28 September 2007, 07:55 PM | #18 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
wrist clock
|
28 September 2007, 08:32 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
IMHO, unless you have over 8 1/4 inch wrist or wearing the watch over Arctic gear or a wet suit, anything larger than 42 mm is too big.
I think for a man, 36-42mm size watches are a good fit. Saw many in Asia wearing large 44mm Panerais on their wrist, that just looked really faddish weird and ridiculous IMHO. If the lugs hang over the sides of your wrist, the watch is too large. |
28 September 2007, 08:37 PM | #20 |
Non-Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UTC-5 Toronto, ON
Posts: 515
|
I had an Omega PO 45.5mm on my wrist and it was over-whelmingly too big, and I have 7.5" wrists - not massive wrists, but fairly common.
I figure that anything past 43mm is too big, unless your wrists are over 8". James
__________________
"AUT VIAM INVENIAM AUT FACIAM - "I'll either find a way or make one" |
28 September 2007, 08:45 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,909
|
|
28 September 2007, 10:44 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,001
|
I think it depends on the watch. My Santos 100 is very large. At 51mm long, but in width it is just a tad wider than a sub. Still it does not look ridiculus on my wrist. The lugs do not hang over my wrist harly at all. The Paneri Black seal I tried on when I was buying my Cartier did look much larger.
My wife calls my Santos the wall clock though. I do wonder if the oversize craze will ever fade. The same thing is happening in the pen business. There are some really huge pens on the market. |
28 September 2007, 10:48 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: GMTII and OP!
Posts: 1,272
|
Monster!!!!!!
The left is a 40mm SAR. With the steel bracelet, the CSAR is over 8oz/227g.
__________________
|
28 September 2007, 11:05 PM | #24 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
wow the one on the right looks like a monster for sure
|
29 September 2007, 12:16 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
|
29 September 2007, 04:16 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Watch: it, Bubba!
Posts: 6,271
|
|
29 September 2007, 04:19 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Watch: it, Bubba!
Posts: 6,271
|
|
29 September 2007, 04:21 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,240
|
What does matter then? Whether you use the "minute hand" or the "second hand"???
__________________
Something witty to go here. Member # 293 |
29 September 2007, 04:47 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
|
They always say that when its too small
__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure |
29 September 2007, 05:44 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Springfield, IL
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 134
|
I have a Fortis B-42 that is 42 mm, and that's about the maximum that I would ever wear on my 8" wrist. I have a number of much smaller Gruens and Bulovas from the 40s and 50s, and they are absolutely tiny compared to the current crop of watches.
I honestly think that this huge watch trend is somewhat of a fad and may not last. I guess time will tell, but you'll never see me buying a 45 mm watch or even another 42. 36- 38 is perfect for a dress watch and sport watches can be up to 42, but not more than that IMHO. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.