ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Robb · 1 October 2007, 11:08 AM

I was at an AD in Atlanta today and was looking at a SD.

Is the dial slightly smaller than a sub????

roadcarver · 1 October 2007, 11:09 AM

Yep, the dia of the dial/face is smaller on the SD.

chris_nor_cal · 1 October 2007, 11:09 AM

yes, 1mm

daunwaun · 1 October 2007, 11:10 AM

no its the same dial except no cyclops and has a valve

daunwaun · 1 October 2007, 11:10 AM

my apoligies its 1mm smaller

Letsgodiving · 1 October 2007, 11:12 AM

It definitely looks smaller when you have them side by side. I have seen where some say it is 1mm smaller but I remember seeing a thread where someone measured them with some sort of calipers and they were the same size.

Atomant · 1 October 2007, 11:31 AM

You're both wrong! It's only 0.5mm smaller.

roadcarver · 1 October 2007, 11:31 AM

I had met up with a guy locally, compared our watches side by side and the sub definitely looks larger.

Alcan · 1 October 2007, 11:31 AM

Here are some dimensions right from our very own Nick Hacko:

http://www.clockmaker.com.au/rolex_case_size.html

Letsgodiving · 1 October 2007, 11:35 AM

There is a chart out there that someone will likely produce that shows a difference of .65mm. I just did a search for the thread that I mentioned ealier but couldn't find it. It may have been from Nick Hacko but unfortunately he deleted all his old posts.

Robb · 1 October 2007, 11:36 AM

Thanks for the info guys!!! I thought it looks smaller.

roadcarver · 1 October 2007, 11:37 AM

Size don't matter, its how you use it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robb

Thanks for the info guys!!! I thought it looks smaller.

Robb · 1 October 2007, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadcarver

Size don't matter, its how you use it

daunwaun · 1 October 2007, 11:42 AM

very interesting info!!! Nick Hacko is one great guy

Tools · 1 October 2007, 01:15 PM

Robb,

You shouldn't be looking at SD's.....You have a Daytona on the way...

frostie · 1 October 2007, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadcarver

Size don't matter, its how you use it

Destroy · 1 October 2007, 01:37 PM

It's (partly) an illusion. The case is thicker, giving it a "smaller in width" appearance.

JJ Irani · 1 October 2007, 04:31 PM

The SD dial is definitely smaller than that of the Sub-date.

The outer case size, however, is the same at 40 mm. Here ya go, this chart should clarify matters!! Check #2

Tombstone · 1 October 2007, 05:30 PM

I like them both, so I bought both

Seadweller · 1 October 2007, 05:38 PM

It may be smaller but it's better looking.

Robb · 1 October 2007, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

Robb,

You shouldn't be looking at SD's.....You have a Daytona on the way...

I wasnt Larry... They had the sub and SD side by side and it looked a little smaller.

1 October 2007, 11:08 AM	#1
Robb 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Robb Location: USA Watch: BLNR Posts: 4,939	Sd?????? I was at an AD in Atlanta today and was looking at a SD. Is the dial slightly smaller than a sub???? __________________ 126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN

1 October 2007, 11:09 AM	#3
chris_nor_cal "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: CA Posts: 688	yes, 1mm __________________

1 October 2007, 11:10 AM	#4
daunwaun "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: toronto Watch: 18K YG Day Date Posts: 2,985	no its the same dial except no cyclops and has a valve __________________ DAUNWAUN

1 October 2007, 11:10 AM	#5
daunwaun "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: toronto Watch: 18K YG Day Date Posts: 2,985	my apoligies its 1mm smaller __________________ DAUNWAUN

1 October 2007, 11:31 AM	#8
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	I had met up with a guy locally, compared our watches side by side and the sub definitely looks larger. __________________ I'm just a cook...

1 October 2007, 11:12 AM	#6
Letsgodiving "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Virginia, US Watch: SD 16600 Posts: 4,319	It definitely looks smaller when you have them side by side. I have seen where some say it is 1mm smaller but I remember seeing a thread where someone measured them with some sort of calipers and they were the same size.

1 October 2007, 11:31 AM	#7
Atomant "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Fernwood Posts: 3,455	You're both wrong! It's only 0.5mm smaller.

1 October 2007, 11:31 AM	#9
Alcan 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Al Location: Way Up North Watch: your P's & Q's Posts: 10,473	Here are some dimensions right from our very own Nick Hacko: http://www.clockmaker.com.au/rolex_case_size.html __________________ Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!

1 October 2007, 11:35 AM	#10
Letsgodiving "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Virginia, US Watch: SD 16600 Posts: 4,319	There is a chart out there that someone will likely produce that shows a difference of .65mm. I just did a search for the thread that I mentioned ealier but couldn't find it. It may have been from Nick Hacko but unfortunately he deleted all his old posts.

1 October 2007, 11:36 AM	#11
Robb 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Robb Location: USA Watch: BLNR Posts: 4,939	Thanks for the info guys!!! I thought it looks smaller. __________________ 126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN

1 October 2007, 11:42 AM	#14
daunwaun "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: toronto Watch: 18K YG Day Date Posts: 2,985	very interesting info!!! Nick Hacko is one great guy __________________ DAUNWAUN

1 October 2007, 01:15 PM	#15
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,514	Robb, You shouldn't be looking at SD's.....You have a Daytona on the way...

1 October 2007, 01:37 PM	#17
Destroy Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: AJ Location: Australia Posts: 732	It's (partly) an illusion. The case is thicker, giving it a "smaller in width" appearance.

1 October 2007, 04:31 PM	#18
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	The SD dial is definitely smaller than that of the Sub-date. The outer case size, however, is the same at 40 mm. Here ya go, this chart should clarify matters!! Check #2 __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

1 October 2007, 05:30 PM	#19
Tombstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Richard Location: LV, NV Watch: LV Sub and others Posts: 2,689	I like them both, so I bought both

1 October 2007, 05:38 PM	#20
Seadweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 750	It may be smaller but it's better looking. __________________ The Exclusive 4000ft Club.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)