The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 April 2012, 05:54 AM   #1
Tri-National-Man
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-National-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
Which to keep..14060M or 16610?

On saturday I acquired a tritium dial 16610 (K serial), in well used but good condition...For a good UK price. It can only stay if I sell my 2 line 14060M...
What do you forum members think I should do, taking these questions into consideration;
Which of the two will be more sought after in the future (20 years+) and easier to sell if needed?
I wish I could keep them both; Love the simple uncluttered Sub and also love the look of the classic Sub date..
Thank you for your considerations and thoughts..
Attached Images
 
Tri-National-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 05:58 AM   #2
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
Love the collection, if one has to go it should be the 14060M IMHO
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 06:00 AM   #3
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by azguy View Post
love the collection, if one has to go it should be the 14060m imho
x2
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 06:01 AM   #4
stockae92
2024 Pledge Member
 
stockae92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,962
keep the 14060M, and save up for 116610 :)
__________________
135
├┼┼╕
246 R
stockae92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 06:12 AM   #5
theironchef106
"TRF" Member
 
theironchef106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Ft Lauderdale, FL
Watch: Day Date II
Posts: 436
I would sell the 14060 keep the 16610
theironchef106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 06:16 AM   #6
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
Sell the ND Sub!!!!!!
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 06:27 AM   #7
Tri-National-Man
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-National-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
Thank you for your answers...But why sell 14060M?...Will it not be the "5513" of the future?...And aren't 16610s much more common than the NDs and for this fact the NDs will be much more sought after in the future?
Tri-National-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 06:36 AM   #8
ufboy73
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
well, by that logic wont the 16610 be the 1680?

i mean, they are all nice watches..i would base it on my own preferences rather than future collectible value - there are way too many 16610's and 14060's for either to be collectible in my mind.

just my thought - too bad you cant keep them all, you have got a great little sub collection there.
ufboy73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 06:51 AM   #9
Tri-National-Man
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-National-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
Yeah, good answer..

Yes I agree that these models have been made in their millions...But hasn't the Sub fan base also grown monstrously..? The new Asian market etc etc..Meaning that the Sub will always be a highly desirable and sought after watch...Especially the ones that were still considered as tool watches and not ceramic jewellery that will never be chosen as standard equipment by the military and explorers..OOps starting to get into slightly dodgy territory here..
Tri-National-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 07:44 AM   #10
wokafu
"TRF" Member
 
wokafu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
wow...this is a tough one....man....(after 10mins) ...man do i really have to choose..??
wokafu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 08:00 AM   #11
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
keep the 14060
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 08:02 AM   #12
1000ft
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Watch: Submariner 14060m
Posts: 45
Nice collection, this is the route I am wanting to go.
1000ft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 08:15 AM   #13
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Keep the Submariner and sell the 16610.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 08:17 AM   #14
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
Nice collection! Tough choice. I'd probably say bye to the 14060.

Good luck!
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 08:51 AM   #15
Jannal
"TRF" Member
 
Jannal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 685
I can't decide.
__________________
Bell & Ross: BRS-98S
Casio: G-Shock GW-5000U / GW-5000-1JF / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-450
Panerai: Luminor 000i
Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335
Jannal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 10:34 AM   #16
Gary Busey
"TRF" Member
 
Gary Busey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pothole
Watch: Tudor Black Bay
Posts: 890
5513....14060....those u keep. No brainer.
__________________
Tudor Black Bay Red Rose ETA
Rolex 214270 Explorer 1
Tudor BB 41 Blue Dial
Doxa Sub 200, SKX009
Aquastar Deepstar
Gary Busey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 10:45 AM   #17
Monte Cristo
"TRF" Member
 
Monte Cristo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-National-Man View Post
Thank you for your answers...But why sell 14060M?...Will it not be the "5513" of the future?...And aren't 16610s much more common than the NDs and for this fact the NDs will be much more sought after in the future?
IMO the 14060M to go.

stop questioning trf opinions and just follow the recomendations blindly. majority rules...
Monte Cristo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 10:57 AM   #18
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Great collection. If one had to go, since you have a 16610LV I would get rid of the 16610 and keep the 14060M.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:00 AM   #19
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by ufboy73 View Post

i mean, they are all nice watches..i would base it on my own preferences rather than future collectible value - there are way too many 16610's and 14060's for either to be collectible in my mind.
You answer is right here
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:05 AM   #20
CDNWatchNut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
I'd keep the sub...but you should keep the one you like better.
CDNWatchNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:19 AM   #21
drockadam
"TRF" Member
 
drockadam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Pepsi.
Posts: 5,749
Keep the 14060, and donate the 16610 to drockadam...
drockadam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:30 AM   #22
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-National-Man View Post
Thank you for your answers...But why sell 14060M?...Will it not be the "5513" of the future?...And aren't 16610s much more common than the NDs and for this fact the NDs will be much more sought after in the future?
Sought after, almost every Rolex is. Hard to find, almost none are. Even with the fewest produced "versions" of the 14060 there are hundreds of thousands or millions out there. The reason some vintage watches are very rare and expensive is when they were produced they werent as expensive and used not to mention produced on a MUCH smaller scale. Many didn't survive now. Look at all the very old stuff thats tare and expensive now. Most of that stuff was used many years ago so now its rare and hard to find. Today even the tool Rolexes are taken care of and will be passed down generations from now. Everyone knows Rolex as a luxury brand. 99.9% are going to still be around in 100++ years. No modern Rolex will ever be that rare or collectable. Again I don't like no date watches at all so the ND sub would be out the door for me. I'd have no regrets selling it.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:30 AM   #23
JohnFM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 479
I'm no expert but condition and uniqueness often lead to value. Your 16610 is in used condition and many were made, so this will not likely have great value. Many 14060Ms were also made but not as many, it's in better condition, and it's less like other Rolexes of its vintage, with lug holes, no date, a different bracelet, etc.

If forced to bet, I'd pick the 14060M. Of course, that may be because I don't have one, and I have a 16610. ;-)
JohnFM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 12:12 PM   #24
kelly56
"TRF" Member
 
kelly56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 16610 1675 Speedy
Posts: 1,057
Keep the 16610, but them I'm biased.
__________________
kelly56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 12:17 PM   #25
z32turbo
"TRF" Member
 
z32turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
I'd sell the 14060 and keep the 16610 if it were me.
__________________


Instagram @z32turbo
z32turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 12:29 PM   #26
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-National-Man View Post
Thank you for your answers...But why sell 14060M?...Will it not be the "5513" of the future?...And aren't 16610s much more common than the NDs and for this fact the NDs will be much more sought after in the future?
If we actually knew what the future would mean, we would all have the right watch and know exactly when to sell it or hold it..

Unfortunately, nobody knows the answer.. You should keep and enjoy the one you want.. hanging onto something because it may be worth a few bucks more in 20 years time is folley...

As to the 14060 being the "next 5513"; perhaps at some point.. but 5513's aren't really in high dollar demand..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 01:16 PM   #27
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by tools View Post
if we actually knew what the future would mean, we would all have the right watch and know exactly when to sell it or hold it..

Unfortunately, nobody knows the answer.. You should keep and enjoy the one you want.. Hanging onto something because it may be worth a few bucks more in 20 years time is folley...

As to the 14060 being the "next 5513"; perhaps at some point.. But 5513's aren't really in high dollar demand..
+1
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 02:00 PM   #28
LeOnfromtheblock
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 127
Great collection first off. I would sell the 16610 and get a 116610 :)

I like how you have the "old" and "new" 2 lined dials and if you wanted to wear a date sub you have the LV... but im a sucker for the 2 lined 14060M's as its my personal favourite and would never part with mine.

LeOnfromtheblock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 02:08 PM   #29
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
If I were you I would decide which one would get more wrist time, and worry less about future value for a watches made in such high numbers.

In my case I like wearing a watch with a date on it, so I'd sell the 14060 two liner if one watch has to go... Oh, by the way, very nice collection you have there...
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 02:29 PM   #30
joesephcho
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Submariner ND
Posts: 188
tough choice...beautiful collection.
joesephcho is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.