The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 April 2012, 01:37 PM   #1
Joey_V
"TRF" Member
 
Joey_V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
Is there a weak point in the clasp of the newer Rolexes?

Hey guys -

Is there a weak point in the clasp of the newer Rolexes? I recall some GMTIICs having problems with the weld points - I looked and could not find if this was an isolated slew of incidents or if it was fixed.

I looked at my Milgauss GV and my SS Daytona and there appears to be weld points. The same goes for my GMTIIC.

Are these weld points potentially weak?
__________________

Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015
Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L
Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD
Joey_V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2012, 01:42 PM   #2
handsfull
"TRF" Member
 
handsfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey_V View Post

Are these weld points potentially weak?

Potentially....if done incorrectly.

There were reports of some breaking early on....but Rolex seems to have corrected/addressed the issue because I haven't seen another case for quite awhile.
handsfull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2012, 02:06 PM   #3
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
Unfortunately I think there could be as the new clasps have not been time tested for decades as the previous models were. Time will tell but I believe the initial issues have been resolved by Rolex as this is not a common issue as of late
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2012, 02:16 PM   #4
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
I think Rolex fixed the issues after a few of the first GMTIIcs had some issues. I haven't seen this in a while.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2012, 02:30 PM   #5
springbar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey_V View Post
Are these weld points potentially weak?
The tiny, uninspectable, blind-welded, partial-penetration joint looks like the mother of all stress risers, but you don't seem to hear about them failing much these days.

There were several reports of failures in the early days, which is especially concerning because that's exactly the place you'd expect that design to fail. When a design that raises eyebrows for its apparent unsoundness turns out to _actually_ be unsound, it makes it appear like Rolex doesn't know what they're doing.

However, I've never heard of one letting go on a Milgauss, so I guess it works.
springbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 12:06 PM   #6
jetlaghawaii
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: ray
Location: usa
Watch: GMT2-C 116710
Posts: 67
My clasp broke after I put my baggage on the scale at the airline check in counter.
The stress of my bend wrist is what did it and I feel lucky it happened there, I could have easily lost my GMTIIc..............
Highly embarrassing and dissapointing non the less!!

It's a 2008 model, I will be visiting the Rolex store once I get back Stateside.
Attached Images
 
jetlaghawaii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 12:29 PM   #7
RolexPete32
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Peter
Location: Canada
Watch: You know... Rolex
Posts: 1,520
Has it only been the GMT2c this happened or other newer clasp models? My air-king has this newer clasp. It has been my daily wearer since Nov. of 2007. The welds seem fine no problems?
RolexPete32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 12:40 PM   #8
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
Wouldn't that clasp also be on the Expl.II?
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 01:06 PM   #9
Ebruner
"TRF" Member
 
Ebruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
Wouldn't that clasp also be on the Expl.II?
Those welds are on every clasp on every watch rolex currently makes.

-Eddie
__________________
Ebruner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 02:07 PM   #10
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetlaghawaii View Post
My clasp broke after I put my baggage on the scale at the airline check in counter.
The stress of my bend wrist is what did it and I feel lucky it happened there, I could have easily lost my GMTIIc..............
Highly embarrassing and dissapointing non the less!!

It's a 2008 model, I will be visiting the Rolex store once I get back Stateside.
Yes it is disappointing. You could have one side failed and did not notice that and then the rest failed under stress again.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 02:09 PM   #11
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
I never had any issues, still a lot more substantial than the old tuna clasp IMO.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 02:10 PM   #12
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Attached Images
 
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 02:16 PM   #13
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
I never had any issues, still a lot more substantial than the old tuna clasp IMO.
Pat, it "FEELS" more substantial but over the long term, I believe the older clasps will hold up at least as good, if not better.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 02:24 PM   #14
BNA/LION
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
BNA/LION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,655
Bummer! You are lucky it did not fall and break. I hope you get a replacement from Rolex!
__________________

✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->?
Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.
BNA/LION is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 02:29 PM   #15
jujin
"TRF" Member
 
jujin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z-Sub View Post
Pat, it "FEELS" more substantial but over the long term, I believe the older clasps will hold up at least as good, if not better.
It definitely feels more substantial like you said. Just looking at the schematics of the clasp, I see a lot of different parts and the more complex something is the more prone it is to failure. No telling how these individual pieces will hold up in the long run but the old clasp was pretty minimalistic and simple in design compared to the current iteration.

jujin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 02:34 PM   #16
mlotus95
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pa
Watch: GMT master II
Posts: 600
cool diagram
mlotus95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 02:51 PM   #17
outlaw468
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Chicago
Watch: Rolex and Omega
Posts: 564
Thanks for sharing that diagram.
__________________
Regards, Steve
outlaw468 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 04:32 PM   #18
jlee5050
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: the throne.
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetlaghawaii View Post
My clasp broke after I put my baggage on the scale at the airline check in counter.
The stress of my bend wrist is what did it and I feel lucky it happened there, I could have easily lost my GMTIIc..............
Highly embarrassing and dissapointing non the less!!

It's a 2008 model, I will be visiting the Rolex store once I get back Stateside.
just curious Ray what's your clasp code? and also 2008=V serial?

Oh boy paranoia is setting in.
jlee5050 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 04:42 PM   #19
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by jujin View Post
It definitely feels more substantial like you said. Just looking at the schematics of the clasp, I see a lot of different parts and the more complex something is the more prone it is to failure. No telling how these individual pieces will hold up in the long run but the old clasp was pretty minimalistic and simple in design compared to the current iteration.

Thanks for this!
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 05:27 PM   #20
jetlaghawaii
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: ray
Location: usa
Watch: GMT2-C 116710
Posts: 67
Jlee5050,

Clasp code is OP9, I have to look at my papers to find the serial number and I can't get at those till 2 weeks from now.

Ray
jetlaghawaii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 06:31 PM   #21
zeuloa
"TRF" Member
 
zeuloa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetlaghawaii View Post
Jlee5050,

Clasp code is OP9, I have to look at my papers to find the serial number and I can't get at those till 2 weeks from now.

Ray
Serial number is inside the dial, at 6 on the outer ring that says rolexrolexrolexrolex.
zeuloa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 11:25 PM   #22
z32turbo
"TRF" Member
 
z32turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
Very cool diagram.

Thanks!
__________________


Instagram @z32turbo
z32turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 11:34 PM   #23
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetlaghawaii View Post
My clasp broke after I put my baggage on the scale at the airline check in counter.
The stress of my bend wrist is what did it and I feel lucky it happened there, I could have easily lost my GMTIIc..............
Highly embarrassing and dissapointing non the less!!

It's a 2008 model, I will be visiting the Rolex store once I get back Stateside.
Wow, hope it gets taken care of by RSC
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 11:38 PM   #24
Johny
"TRF" Member
 
Johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
i think that it is a solder joint(non fusion) rather than a spot weld(fusion).
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM.
Johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 11:46 PM   #25
MP5
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johny View Post
i think that it is a solder joint(non fusion) rather than a spot weld(fusion).
I agree as the weld should be stronger than the material around it. This is a QC issue that is probably corrected by now but it was a major mistake
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2012, 11:48 PM   #26
bigrustypig
"TRF" Member
 
bigrustypig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: New Zealand
Watch: Rolex DSSD
Posts: 1,426
Very good info. thanks for sharing. I learned some more with that great diagram.
bigrustypig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2012, 12:01 AM   #27
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey_V View Post
Hey guys -

Is there a weak point in the clasp of the newer Rolexes? I recall some GMTIICs having problems with the weld points - I looked and could not find if this was an isolated slew of incidents or if it was fixed.

I looked at my Milgauss GV and my SS Daytona and there appears to be weld points. The same goes for my GMTIIC.

Are these weld points potentially weak?
I'd say one downside is their huge cost if you need to replace one. IIRC they are $1,200 retail. That's a lot of money for a clasp.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2012, 03:55 AM   #28
jetlaghawaii
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: ray
Location: usa
Watch: GMT2-C 116710
Posts: 67
It's a "z" serial, I guess a little older than I thought...
jetlaghawaii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2012, 04:31 AM   #29
David cote
2024 Pledge Member
 
David cote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: David Cote
Location: 603/Boston 617
Watch: Watches etc
Posts: 2,322
It looks like a brazed item, I work in Brazing and Heat treating and that is what it looks like!!

Brazing is a metal-joining process whereby a filler metal is heated above melting point and distributed between two or more close-fitting parts by capillary action. The filler metal is brought slightly above its melting (liquidus) temperature while protected by a suitable atmosphere, usually a flux. It then flows over the base metal (known as wetting) and is then cooled to join the workpieces together.[1] It is similar to soldering, except the temperatures used to melt the filler metal are higher.
David cote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2012, 04:37 AM   #30
jlee5050
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: the throne.
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetlaghawaii View Post
Jlee5050,

Clasp code is OP9, I have to look at my papers to find the serial number and I can't get at those till 2 weeks from now.

Ray
Thanks for the info. No disrespect nor any intention of raining on your parade but it seems according to an old thread on the boards the OP series bracelets are very prone to this type of accident. I just checked mine and it's a PJ6. Took a good look at it today and it seems fine. So far that is.

Hope you get it resolved... and I hope Rolex will do something about this too.
jlee5050 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.