The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

View Poll Results: Salary Ranges
$75-100k 19 17.27%
$100-125k 20 18.18%
$125-150k 21 19.09%
$150-200k 14 12.73%
$200-250k 9 8.18%
$250-300k 7 6.36%
$300,000 + 20 18.18%
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 May 2012, 08:37 AM   #31
Chipmunk
"TRF" Member
 
Chipmunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
My answer is all of the above.
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats

Chipmunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 10:34 AM   #32
cedargrove
"TRF" Member
 
cedargrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
I picked the last option, because I'd prefer it over all the other options.
cedargrove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 10:45 AM   #33
Carolina
"TRF" Member
 
Carolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Watch: it, Bubba!
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by wantonebad View Post
it's not really a fair question in my opinion, I'm not trying to be a jerk but I have friends who have raised family's on a single teachers salary and have scrimped and saved at every turn and I have friends who have one kid and both parents work, they always cry poor and go on vacations twice a year. I mean it's a mater of priorities isn't it? And education/training industry you work in, motivation/drive, location lots of factors to consider.

__________________
.
.Member #5380
.
Carolina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 10:56 AM   #34
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,297
A bazillion dollars, U.S. $'s.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 10:58 AM   #35
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Too many factors to consider to answer. Here in Northern California, a working couple would need at least 200K to live comfortably in a middle class/upper middle class neighborhood. The housing prices are astronomical.
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 11:09 AM   #36
Letsgodiving
"TRF" Member
 
Letsgodiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chipmunk View Post
My answer is all of the above.


A little off-topic but since this isn't a scientific poll and is already wandering wasn't there a recent study that indicated that $75k was approximately the break-even point in salary vs. happiness? Basically once you hit that salary you generally have all your needs met and people who reach that amount are just as happy/content as folks who make much more. Below that amount and your satisfaction in life and general happiness tends to be lower.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC)
Letsgodiving is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 01:03 PM   #37
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by sea-dweller View Post
Too many factors to consider to answer. Here in Northern California, a working couple would need at least 200K to live comfortably in a middle class/upper middle class neighborhood. The housing prices are astronomical.
And a lot more if they want to live in Palo Alto, for example, and don't already own a house purchased years ago.
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 01:34 PM   #38
Boopie
"TRF" Member
 
Boopie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 3,952
Hard to say. Location is a factor, plus whether there are two working parents or one. In LA there are so many terrible schools and terrible neighborhoods. Great neighborhoods with great schools that are relatively close to downtown are expensive. There are also great neighborhoods and schools that are more affordable, but are much farther away. So, you "pay" by either paying more for a home, or paying with your time (via a commute).

I think living in LA for under $75-100K a year gross is really tough. "Do-able," but tough.
Boopie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 02:02 PM   #39
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonan View Post
haha, no option below $75k? You just eliminated probably about 90% of the world population.
99.9%
__________________
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 02:11 PM   #40
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,259
$343K puts you in the top 1% of US household earnings (key word "household"). Median (50th percentile) is $43K per household. $75K, your bottom rung, is roughly the 80th percentile in US. So, of 116M households in US(2010 census) your poll eliminates the lowest 94 or so million households. So anyone answering the poll is probably in pretty good shape, whether they know it or not!
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 02:15 PM   #41
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,259
For what it's worth...2005 numbers to put it in perspective: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Househo..._United_States
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 02:27 PM   #42
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
$10k per month
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 02:33 PM   #43
EE33
"TRF" Member
 
EE33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Des
Location: China
Watch: 16613 16710 116520
Posts: 2,841
Dalip's $600,000 pa nett for 25 hrs a week work.
__________________
TRFs "after Dark" bar and NightClub Addict

Punctuality is the courtesy shown only by Kings

Dalip: "GTG posts are worthless without pics, absolutely worthless"
EE33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 03:05 PM   #44
Cato
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Land of the Lost
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boopie View Post
Hard to say. Location is a factor, plus whether there are two working parents or one. In LA there are so many terrible schools and terrible neighborhoods. Great neighborhoods with great schools that are relatively close to downtown are expensive. There are also great neighborhoods and schools that are more affordable, but are much farther away. So, you "pay" by either paying more for a home, or paying with your time (via a commute).

I think living in LA for under $75-100K a year gross is really tough. "Do-able," but tough.
You know, there is a world east of the 405.
Cato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 03:20 PM   #45
Monte Cristo
"TRF" Member
 
Monte Cristo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
Whatever I pay my employees
__________________
'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill
Monte Cristo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 03:44 PM   #46
david_ord
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: David
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Deep Sea 116660
Posts: 495
I find it lame that the OP started a thread with an ambiguous question, then never bothers to follow it or address it in any manner. He simply vanished, so it seems.

But in reality, he didn't go anywhere. He's been online the whole time. He just started another thread about his kitchen cabinets 2 hours ago. http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=234116

Proper etiquette dictates that if you start a thread, you need to be diligent enough to follow it, read every response, interact with participants....answer questions.... If you care enough to start the thread, you should care enough to tend to it.
david_ord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 04:37 PM   #47
AIKO
"TRF" Member
 
AIKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,937
I am guessing you are including bonuses, commissions ect...I agree with others that I have friends that earn close to 7 figures per year and seem over-extended and others that earn 80k per year that seem like the richest people in the world (very happy).
AIKO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 04:47 PM   #48
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by david_ord View Post
I find it lame that the OP started a thread with an ambiguous question, then never bothers to follow it or address it in any manner. He simply vanished, so it seems.

But in reality, he didn't go anywhere. He's been online the whole time. He just started another thread about his kitchen cabinets 2 hours ago. http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=234116

Proper etiquette dictates that if you start a thread, you need to be diligent enough to follow it, read every response, interact with participants....answer questions.... If you care enough to start the thread, you should care enough to tend to it.
How dare he start a thread about kitchen cabinets before tending to this thread?
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 04:57 PM   #49
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
I believe Harvard did a study and the answer was 35%ore than you are currently making is considered by most to be a good salary. It's impossible to pick just on numbers without knowing variables. My fiancé and I live in the house her parents got her after college so not much bill wise now. We spend our money on cars, vacations, our toys, and going out to eat and AC a lot, and of course retirement funds. We are young with no kids and 2 pets. Our combind salary in the $170k range is wonderful for us. We don't want for anything and can still put back a ton into savings. NJ is very expensive here but I live a life I couldn't imagine leaving college. I hope to continue getting better jobs but as long as there are no kids in our picture we will live very comfortable for many years.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 08:07 PM   #50
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by EE33 View Post
Dalip's $600,000 pa nett for 25 hrs a week work.
Bringing back memories of when I first started working
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2012, 10:11 PM   #51
jhilly8982
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: chicago
Posts: 334
I think like alot of people have already stated, it is all relative. When I graduated college in 2004 and moved to chicago my salary was $50k, wife earned around $25-30k. We didn't have car payments, student loans or credit card debt, we only had 1 bedroom apt rent and utilities to pay and that seemed like plenty of money to go out to eat occasionally and take some frugal vacations. Last year our adjusted gross income was $195k and with that comes more bills, $36k a year in rent, $10k a year for our car and all I can think about is that I don't earn enough, even though we save around $40-50k of that a year, but the majority of that will go to a house downpayment. We don't max out my wifes 401k be we should and I put away $5k a year for my IRA.

Oh the irony as I type this response on a luxury watch forum :)
jhilly8982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2012, 12:03 AM   #52
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
High income usually means high expenses.

I voted option 1.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2012, 12:13 AM   #53
Lisa
"TRF" Member
 
Lisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 15,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayerische View Post
High income usually means high expenses.

I voted option 1.
...
Lisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2012, 12:55 AM   #54
floater156
"TRF" Member
 
floater156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by david_ord View Post
I find it lame that the OP started a thread with an ambiguous question, then never bothers to follow it or address it in any manner. He simply vanished, so it seems.

But in reality, he didn't go anywhere. He's been online the whole time. He just started another thread about his kitchen cabinets 2 hours ago. http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=234116

Proper etiquette dictates that if you start a thread, you need to be diligent enough to follow it, read every response, interact with participants....answer questions.... If you care enough to start the thread, you should care enough to tend to it.
I've read the posts and agree with most of them that said it's a diffuclt question to answer. I apologize for my lack of responsiveness to this thread. I was more interested in the poll than the written answers.
__________________
Lead by example through production.
floater156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.