Confirmed increase- new msrps

[gwozhog]

Paid 9k to my AD and 800 bucks to Obama tax for my TT sub C. At 13.4k now I'm feeling pretty good about purchase now. A few more price increases and I may need to start thinking about insuring my investment.

[ssmui]

Rolex is getting out of reach, I am looking at Tudor now ...:(

[coralhound]

Originally Posted by dr3ziz

Thanks Dave, lucky i managed to grab an LV last week .... do you have an idea about MSRP of the Sub LV ?

I was told new MSRP for the sub LV is $9050. Crazy!!!

[wokafu]

wow..sounds like my test on the source works.....still a feeling of sad....my Subc is 10% further now..

[FremStar]

Originally Posted by ssmui

Rolex is getting out of reach, I am looking at Tudor now ...:(

Nothing wrong with that! Get one before the Tudor price increase as well!

[vmm]

Originally Posted by FremStar

Nothing wrong with that! Get one before the Tudor price increase as well!

Damn! That is one beautiful watch! Not sure whether I should get the Chrono or the black bay first.

You have a fine collection sir! College funding for a 3 year old, 5 year old and 8 year old have put off the purchase of some of the more stunning high end pieces you enjoy. At least I can enjoy your awesome pics. I've gotten approval for a heritage and a Black Bay. Daytona will have to wait!

[GradyPhilpott]

Originally Posted by Megalobyte

Maybe I'm alone here, but a major draw of Rolex for me is the tremendous resale value.

For some of us resale value is pretty much meaningless. I'm not a flipper and a Rolex is not like a car that I can reasonably predict that I will want to trade in on a new car, when it comes time.

I bought my watches to last me the rest of my life and I don't really see my ever selling one, except under the direst of conditions.

I feel pretty sure that if things get that dire, the market may be flooded with used Rolex watches and what will happen to the resale value then.

I'm not even disappointed that the prices have been increased. There just aren't anymore watches in the line that I'm interested in paying the current going prices for, so I will spend that money on other things.

I won't even go so far as to say that the prices are too high. I'm a little surprised that some are squawking about the price of the 114060 because when it was first announced most people who ventured a guess, guessed right at $7500.

And I don't see what the problem is with the price of the 114060 because it's had some pretty expensive changes that not 6 months ago many members were screaming for, calling the bracelet the "tuna-can" bracelet and saying that the aluminum bezel was dated and not as nifty as the ceramic bezel.

I doubt that the Parachrom adds anything to the price, since my 14060M has one and I paid the same price as those with the Nivarox hairsprings.

When the public demands upgrades and the economy demands price increases, those increases are going to be substantial.

So, the price of a 114060 is about $1200 more than a 14060M under the last price schedule. Isn't that about the replacement cost of a ceramic bezel?

If so, the increase doesn't seem out of line, at all.

[Bangel]

Originally Posted by texex91

Not until FedEx shows up telling them, just like everyone found out today that did not know...it's coming.

Completely agree with you there.

I guess it just means the price increase in the USA is not timed to coincide with those that may take place in the rest of the world, like the opening of some blockbuster movie. It's 1st June in Sydney already and the price of Rolex hasn't gone up as yet......

[zeuloa]

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

For some of us resale value is pretty much meaningless. I'm not a flipper and a Rolex is not like a car that I can reasonably predict that I will want to trade in on a new car, when it comes time.

I bought my watches to last me the rest of my life and I don't really see my ever selling one, except under the direst of conditions.

I feel pretty sure that if things get that dire, the market may be flooded with used Rolex watches and what will happen to the resale value then.

I'm not even disappointed that the prices have been increased. There just aren't anymore watches in the line that I'm interested in paying the current going prices for, so I will spend that money on other things.

I won't even go so far as to say that the prices are too high. I'm a little surprised that some are squawking about the price of the 114060 because when it was first announced most people who ventured a guess, guessed right at $7500.

And I don't see what the problem is with the price of the 114060 because it's had some pretty expensive changes that not 6 months ago many members were screaming for, calling the bracelet the "tuna-can" bracelet and saying that the aluminum bezel was dated and not as nifty as the ceramic bezel.

I doubt that the Parachrom adds anything to the price, since my 14060M has one and I paid the same price as those with the Nivarox hairsprings.

When the public demands upgrades and the economy demands price increases, those increases are going to be substantial.

So, the price of a 114060 is about $1200 more than a 14060M under the last price schedule. Isn't that about the replacement cost of a ceramic bezel?

If so, the increase doesn't seem out of line, at all.

Excellent assessment! The new glide lock clasp is about $1200 as well if I'm not mistaken.

[Megalobyte]

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

For some of us resale value is pretty much meaningless. I'm not a flipper and a Rolex is not like a car that I can reasonably predict that I will want to trade in on a new car, when it comes time.

I bought my watches to last me the rest of my life and I don't really see my ever selling one, except under the direst of conditions.

I feel pretty sure that if things get that dire, the market may be flooded with used Rolex watches and what will happen to the resale value then.

I'm not even disappointed that the prices have been increased. There just aren't anymore watches in the line that I'm interested in paying the current going prices for, so I will spend that money on other things.

I won't even go so far as to say that the prices are too high. I'm a little surprised that some are squawking about the price of the 114060 because when it was first announced most people who ventured a guess, guessed right at $7500.

And I don't see what the problem is with the price of the 114060 because it's had some pretty expensive changes that not 6 months ago many members were screaming for, calling the bracelet the "tuna-can" bracelet and saying that the aluminum bezel was dated and not as nifty as the ceramic bezel.

I doubt that the Parachrom adds anything to the price, since my 14060M has one and I paid the same price as those with the Nivarox hairsprings.

When the public demands upgrades and the economy demands price increases, those increases are going to be substantial.

So, the price of a 114060 is about $1200 more than a 14060M under the last price schedule. Isn't that about the replacement cost of a ceramic bezel?

If so, the increase doesn't seem out of line, at all.

I'm not really a flipper either, but, I still find some comfort in knowing that something I own is likely to hold its value or appreciate, rather than the reverse. I have many neat things I plan on holding onto, that I still would like to see hold their, or appreciate in, value. All else being equal I think it's generally preferable for one's net worth/assets to not depreciate, as we never do know what the future holds.

[SaddleSC]

Originally Posted by FremStar

Nothing wrong with that! Get one before the Tudor price increase as well!

I am a little surprised that a top-shelf financier, such as yourself, is not rocking the HP12C with RPN:)

[Bangel]

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

I won't even go so far as to say that the prices are too high. I'm a little surprised that some are squawking about the price of the 114060 because when it was first announced most people who ventured a guess, guessed right at $7500.

And I don't see what the problem is with the price of the 114060 because it's had some pretty expensive changes that not 6 months ago many members were screaming for, calling the bracelet the "tuna-can" bracelet and saying that the aluminum bezel was dated and not as nifty as the ceramic bezel.

I doubt that the Parachrom adds anything to the price, since my 14060M has one and I paid the same price as those with the Nivarox hairsprings.

When the public demands upgrades and the economy demands price increases, those increases are going to be substantial.

So, the price of a 114060 is about $1200 more than a 14060M under the last price schedule. Isn't that about the replacement cost of a ceramic bezel?

If so, the increase doesn't seem out of line, at all.

Yes, I have to agree here too. Good points Grady.

When I referred to the Australian price of the 114060 earlier it was what I expected, but it still made me pause for a moment when I heard it out loud at the AD.

[VAWATCHGUY]

Wow! Thanks DSW.

Any reason why the DSSD jumped so much? That is a 13% increase.

[77T]

NEWS FLASH!!!

No - I repeat NO - Rolex Price Increase at the TRF Classifieds!!!

When times get tough the tough get going. Stop yer whining and git 'er done. Here's the link to no Rolex Price Increase http://www.rolexforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=9

OK, just kidding - but I'm serious about adapting vs. complaining.

Gotta run for now, my Veblen curve is itching a lot...

[MK25toLife]

I dont know all those ref numbers off the top of my head but it looks like from what members have been posting this is primarily just SS and TT? Can someone confirm? What's up w/gold?

I've had my eye on a 116718, gold GMT-IIC, what's the word on that, anyone know?

[93 Turbo]

Originally Posted by Bangel

Completely agree with you there.

I guess it just means the price increase in the USA is not timed to coincide with those that may take place in the rest of the world, like the opening of some blockbuster movie. It's 1st June in Sydney already and the price of Rolex hasn't gone up as yet......

To echo your earlier comments, I was in Farren Price earlier today and they were unaware of any scheduled increase in the near future.

So were safe in Aus for a little while yet, even though I try to avoid buying in Australia generally.

[Rags]

I was hoping to one day be able to get a new Sub C but the way rolex keeps increasing their prices I doubt it. I guess preowned is the way for me. Oh well...At least I have one rolex.

[herbalt]

Originally Posted by Megalobyte

Maybe I'm alone here, but a major draw of Rolex for me is the tremendous resale value. It's the increases that are mostly responsible for that. I like that the Sub C I bought bnib (from a trusted seller) 9 months ago for 6900 is now worth more USED than I just paid for it bnib. It's also selfish of me since I really don't foresee buying more Rolexes, just wanted the 116610 really.

As long as Rolex keeps raising prices, and is smart enough to know the market well enough to get away with it, who cares? The Rolex you buy today will still hold its value, or even increase down the road. You might even make a few bucks. How many other watches stay the same or increase in value inside of a year or 2? You can't have your Rolex and eat it too. :) Either you accept the increases and pony up more than you would like for the initial purchase, knowing you won't lose much if anything down the road, or, no increases, the initial cost is less, but diminished resale value. Can't have both.

Now if they do hit a ceiling and can't go higher and make acceptable profits, the unlucky ones who bought at the peak will not do quite as well. But even then, they won't lose a bundle like you often do with luxury goods.

Let's be honest, maybe us fans and WIS's might, but how many other Rolex buyers would be interested in wearing a "Rolex" if it was priced at $300.

Again, the Veblen theory really does seem to apply here.

x2!!!

[Dr. Robert]

Originally Posted by mtrunner

The other bummer is there will most likely be an increase for servicing our watches as well.

in that case, I'll wear the watch as jewelry & use my cell-phone for the time.

[psv]

Man, I remember when the used prices on a DSSD was $6,500. Those days are long gone...

[FremStar]

Originally Posted by vmm

Damn! That is one beautiful watch! Not sure whether I should get the Chrono or the black bay first.

You have a fine collection sir! College funding for a 3 year old, 5 year old and 8 year old have put off the purchase of some of the more stunning high end pieces you enjoy. At least I can enjoy your awesome pics. I've gotten approval for a heritage and a Black Bay. Daytona will have to wait!

Thank you sir! It's all about priorities and you have them all set! Don't worry the sight of seeing your 3 kids become successful cannot compare to these metal instruments we use to tell time! You are already in the winners circle!

Originally Posted by SaddleSC

I am a little surprised that a top-shelf financier, such as yourself, is not rocking the HP12C with RPN:)

Hahahahahahah! Good one Charles!

Originally Posted by MK25toLife

I dont know all those ref numbers off the top of my head but it looks like from what members have been posting this is primarily just SS and TT? Can someone confirm? What's up w/gold?

I've had my eye on a 116718, gold GMT-IIC, what's the word on that, anyone know?

Looks like $32k+ USD

[psv]

Yeah, I thought they said $32,400 for the 116718. Or was it $32,800? Oh well, there goes the neighborhood.

[QueueCumber]

Was there a price increase on the YG DD (118238)?

[EE33]

Originally Posted by 93 Turbo

So were safe in Aus for a little while yet, even though I try to avoid buying in Australia generally.

Prices are sooooo darn high here already. The USA can have 10 price increases and still be behind Aust's MRSP.

[Hairdude1]

Thanks for the update!

[psv]

Yes, I believe so. At least 5%, I think a bit more actually. The DSSD had the biggest increase at +11%. Other models for the US ranged from 4.5-11.1% or there abouts.

[zeuloa]

Originally Posted by gwozhog

Paid 9k to my AD and 800 bucks to Obama tax for my TT sub C. At 13.4k now I'm feeling pretty good about purchase now. A few more price increases and I may need to start thinking about insuring my investment.

... I think those taxes actually go to Rick Perry.

[jedinite]

US price for the Ex II 42 was $7,750 and will be $8,100 tomorrow. Canadian MSRP is C$8,200+tax Got mine in March for C$7,350 (tax in). Don't know if Canada will have increases as well, most likely it will go up. Probably my last Rolex for a looonnnggg time!

[10:10:31 28]

Originally Posted by gwozhog

Paid 9k to my AD and 800 bucks to Obama tax for my TT sub C. At 13.4k now I'm feeling pretty good about purchase now. A few more price increases and I may need to start thinking about insuring my investment.

I didn't realize there was no such thing as sales tax until he came along. I could swear I paid a Bush tax on my first Rolex and a Clinton tax on my first Omega.

Has anyone heard of any price increase for Tudor or is it just Rolex for now?

[btinl]

Do discontinued watches like the 14060M increase in price or just stay at their last listed?