ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

patrike · 7 June 2012, 07:27 PM

Whats the most appropriate to wear as a guest to a wedding with a dark suit dresscode? Only been to white tie weddings before and it's a big no no with watches then.

Would the GMT be too sporty?

:)

Name: ImageUploadedByTapatalk1339061218.347351.jpg
Views: 620
Size: 70.3 KB

Name: ImageUploadedByTapatalk1339061218.347351.jpg
Views: 620
Size: 70.3 KB

Monte Cristo · 7 June 2012, 07:30 PM

Please do the Reverso of what I'm about to say.....wear the GMT.

padi56 · 7 June 2012, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrike

Whats the most appropriate to wear as a guest to a wedding with a dark suit dresscode? Only been to white tie weddings before and it's a big no no with watches then.

Would the GMT be too sporty?

:)

Attachment 286167

Why is a big no no to wear any sort of watch to whatever wedding you have been invited to as a guest.Is the type of watch a guest too, and must have a dress code or a particular type or brand.

beaglehusky · 7 June 2012, 08:13 PM

I'd say choice number one would be not to wear a watch.

If you feel naked without one - like I do - wear the Reverso.

Have fun either way!

capote · 7 June 2012, 08:32 PM

I can't see your posted pic but a Reverso would look much better with formal wear than a Rolex GMT

Hairdude1 · 7 June 2012, 08:33 PM

GMT all the way. The PCL make the sporty more dressy.

McLovin · 7 June 2012, 08:33 PM

Reverso

SeaDweller50 · 7 June 2012, 08:37 PM

GMT will look perfect.

crew · 7 June 2012, 08:40 PM

Let me start with i own and love my GMT. However, if you decide not to go with the Reverso you might as well sell it.
It's a perfect understated watch to wear with a suit or a tux.
If not for the wedding when would you ever wear it?

Al1988 · 7 June 2012, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaglehusky

I'd say choice number one would be not to wear a watch.

If you feel naked without one - like I do - wear the Reverso.

Have fun either way!

I've never understood this, why is it that on formal occasions it is deemed appropriate to not wear a watch? Surely a dress watch is by definition quite an elegant and formal piece of attire?

I've always been confused by this

And I would personally go for the Reverso

capote · 7 June 2012, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al1988

I've never understood this, why is it that on formal occasions it is deemed appropriate to not wear a watch? Surely a dress watch is by definition quite an elegant and formal piece of attire?

The general consensus at TRF is that it is considered rude to look at the time on an occation like that. Call me rude, but I would go with the Reverso and glanze down on it when things gets too dull

learningtofly · 7 June 2012, 08:50 PM

In reality it doesn't matter these days, but if you're not going to wear the Reverso for this sort of occasion when are you going to wear it?

sirjohnbrian · 7 June 2012, 08:54 PM

I would personally go with the Reverso in that formal affairs are better off with a watch that has a leather band.

Al1988 · 7 June 2012, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by capote

The general consensus at TRF is that it is considered rude to look at the time on an occation like that. Call me rude, but I would go with the Reverso and glanze down on it when things gets too dull

As if we all buy these watches simply to tell the time!!

Chances are if one of us keeps looking at their watch it's because they've caught it in a good light and are admiring it hehe.

I'd say there's more danger of someone looking at their phone on such occasions than their watch in order to tell the time. Time to invest a "dress", "casual" and "beater" phone then I think

jay1988 · 7 June 2012, 09:02 PM

What to wear to a wedding, a dress watch or a sports watch ?

For me it's not even a question because the sports watch isn't even an option.

You have a great suit/tux watch in the Reverso. Go with it.

wokafu · 7 June 2012, 09:02 PM

Reverso x2

JGX · 7 June 2012, 09:10 PM

Complete pretentious, pseudo middle-class nonsense! Wear whatever you like - if Prince Harry and William can wear an Exp II and a Seamaster respectively, with formal dress (as they did this weekend) then it surely shows that these out-dates 'rules' have finally changed for the better. . .

john333 · 7 June 2012, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al1988

I've never understood this, why is it that on formal occasions it is deemed appropriate to not wear a watch? Surely a dress watch is by definition quite an elegant and formal piece of attire?

I've always been confused by this

And I would personally go for the Reverso

+1.

Wear whichever watch you want...who cares what anyone else thinks??

beshannon · 7 June 2012, 09:18 PM

I would wear mine

93 Turbo · 7 June 2012, 09:21 PM

Good problem you have there, you decide their your watches.

Don't think I've ever seen a wedding invite that says no sport watches. Very nice watches you have there Patrik.

Demosthene · 7 June 2012, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crew

Let me start with i own and love my GMT. However, if you decide not to go with the Reverso you might as well sell it.
It's a perfect understated watch to wear with a suit or a tux.
If not for the wedding when would you ever wear it?

I wear my reverso all the time.
It works pretty well with just jeans and a dark polo.

Celter · 7 June 2012, 09:41 PM

The Reverso !!

cedargrove · 7 June 2012, 09:48 PM

If you have the Reverso, then what better time to wear it.

mjclark32 · 7 June 2012, 09:51 PM

Wear whatever you want. I wore my 16610 to my black tie wedding, fit right in.

painter76 · 7 June 2012, 10:12 PM

I love GMT, but for dress if I could I i'd prefer Reverso

beaglehusky · 7 June 2012, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JGX

Complete pretentious, pseudo middle-class nonsense! Wear whatever you like - if Prince Harry and William can wear an Exp II and a Seamaster respectively, with formal dress (as they did this weekend) then it surely shows that these out-dates 'rules' have finally changed for the better. . .

LOL. Yeah, make sure you eat with your fingers too and remember that white socks go with everything. Hell, just go without socks!

treeinthecity · 7 June 2012, 10:42 PM

Reverso but I am in the camp of no sports watches at formal events.

kilyung · 7 June 2012, 10:49 PM

Reverso

AMCK87 · 7 June 2012, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crew

Let me start with i own and love my GMT. However, if you decide not to go with the Reverso you might as well sell it.
It's a perfect understated watch to wear with a suit or a tux.
If not for the wedding when would you ever wear it?

x2

The Reverso is a beautiful and elegant timepiece, perfect for these formal occasions.

Grumpy Badger · 7 June 2012, 10:55 PM

If the GMT was your only watch I wouldnt have a problem with it but, since you own it anyway, I'd go Reverso.

It is funny how perception changes, however, since everyone is talking about the reverso as a dress watch when there is a strong case for the fact that it was the first ever SPORTS watch when it was designed for polo playing army officers in 1931!

7 June 2012, 07:27 PM	#1
patrike "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Patrik Location: WISland Watch: The sun go down. Posts: 895	GMT vs JLC Reverso to a wedding (dress code dark suit) Whats the most appropriate to wear as a guest to a wedding with a dark suit dresscode? Only been to white tie weddings before and it's a big no no with watches then. Would the GMT be too sporty? :) __________________

7 June 2012, 07:30 PM	#2
Monte Cristo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Sydney Watch: ing you... Posts: 3,775	Please do the Reverso of what I'm about to say.....wear the GMT. __________________ 'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill

7 June 2012, 08:50 PM	#12
learningtofly 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Tony Location: London, England Watch: Hmmm... Posts: 2,483	In reality it doesn't matter these days, but if you're not going to wear the Reverso for this sort of occasion when are you going to wear it? __________________ Tony

7 June 2012, 08:54 PM	#13
sirjohnbrian "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: PA Watch: 'chu lookin' at??? Posts: 964	I would personally go with the Reverso in that formal affairs are better off with a watch that has a leather band. __________________ "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." Mark Twain "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson SS Midsize DJ 68274 "L" TT Jubilee DJ 116233 "Z" Sea Dweller DS 116660 "V" SS White Dial Daytona "V"

7 June 2012, 09:18 PM	#19
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	I would wear mine __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

7 June 2012, 08:13 PM	#4
beaglehusky "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Adrian Location: Tanzania Posts: 1,553	I'd say choice number one would be not to wear a watch. If you feel naked without one - like I do - wear the Reverso. Have fun either way!

7 June 2012, 08:32 PM	#5
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	I can't see your posted pic but a Reverso would look much better with formal wear than a Rolex GMT

7 June 2012, 08:33 PM	#6
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	GMT all the way. The PCL make the sporty more dressy.

7 June 2012, 08:33 PM	#7
McLovin "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Watch: SubC Posts: 1,014	Reverso

7 June 2012, 08:37 PM	#8
SeaDweller50 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Sandy Location: England. Watch: 14060M 2 liner Posts: 3,204	GMT will look perfect.

7 June 2012, 08:40 PM	#9
crew "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: John Location: Rochester/Naples Watch: Pepsi Posts: 18,307	Let me start with i own and love my GMT. However, if you decide not to go with the Reverso you might as well sell it. It's a perfect understated watch to wear with a suit or a tux. If not for the wedding when would you ever wear it?

7 June 2012, 09:02 PM	#15
jay1988 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Midlands Posts: 1,515	What to wear to a wedding, a dress watch or a sports watch ? For me it's not even a question because the sports watch isn't even an option. You have a great suit/tux watch in the Reverso. Go with it.

7 June 2012, 09:02 PM	#16
wokafu "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Malaysia Watch: SM300+14060M Posts: 2,012	Reverso x2

7 June 2012, 09:10 PM	#17
JGX "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Jonathan Location: Wales, UK Posts: 789	Complete pretentious, pseudo middle-class nonsense! Wear whatever you like - if Prince Harry and William can wear an Exp II and a Seamaster respectively, with formal dress (as they did this weekend) then it surely shows that these out-dates 'rules' have finally changed for the better. . .

7 June 2012, 09:21 PM	#20
93 Turbo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Australia Watch: Rolex.Tudor.PAM Posts: 1,554	Good problem you have there, you decide their your watches. Don't think I've ever seen a wedding invite that says no sport watches. Very nice watches you have there Patrik.

7 June 2012, 09:41 PM	#22
Celter "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Norway Posts: 130	This is really a no-brainer..... The Reverso !!

7 June 2012, 09:48 PM	#23
cedargrove "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Rich Location: Canada Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc Posts: 3,013	If you have the Reverso, then what better time to wear it.

7 June 2012, 09:51 PM	#24
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Wear whatever you want. I wore my 16610 to my black tie wedding, fit right in. __________________

7 June 2012, 10:12 PM	#25
painter76 Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Piacenza - Italy Watch: sub 16610 k series Posts: 51	I love GMT, but for dress if I could I i'd prefer Reverso

7 June 2012, 10:42 PM	#27
treeinthecity "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Tri Location: boston Watch: Hulk Posts: 88	Reverso but I am in the camp of no sports watches at formal events.

7 June 2012, 10:49 PM	#28
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	Reverso

7 June 2012, 10:55 PM	#30
Grumpy Badger "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Mark Location: Bonny Scotland Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc) Posts: 5,280	If the GMT was your only watch I wouldnt have a problem with it but, since you own it anyway, I'd go Reverso. It is funny how perception changes, however, since everyone is talking about the reverso as a dress watch when there is a strong case for the fact that it was the first ever SPORTS watch when it was designed for polo playing army officers in 1931! __________________ Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)