ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 July 2012, 12:32 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
I have both and I'd get a Sub over the Seamaster if I could only have one.
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
5 July 2012, 01:37 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: paul
Location: surabaya
Posts: 321
|
I've been eyeing the new PO 8500 for quite some time, tried on the old PO several times, hasnt got the chance to see the new one in flesh. From my experience, i find the submariner more classic and better looking on the wrist for sure, even with the new maxi case fat lugs, the PO lugs design just didnt do it for me, its how the lugs and the end link meets that i dont like. Don't get me wrong, the PO is a nice watch and i could see myself someday have one. But if i were in your position, definitely sub over PO.
|
5 July 2012, 04:35 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
|
i'd say rolex. but i think you may be buying it for the wrong reasons. that's just my opinion, of course. but, yeah, i'd go with the rolex.
__________________
2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph |
5 July 2012, 07:21 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: GMT II ceramic
Posts: 1,590
|
We can't really compare Rolex to Omega... Mechanically speaking a toyota Camry is better than a Mercedes, Audi, or, BMW.
If you want a fine watch go for the Rolex! |
5 July 2012, 07:42 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Robert
Location: USA, California
Watch: Sub 116610
Posts: 240
|
Omega is a fine watch but Sub is the dream come true
|
5 July 2012, 07:56 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
|
5 July 2012, 07:57 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
|
5 July 2012, 08:01 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
|
5 July 2012, 09:16 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Delaware
Watch: 116660
Posts: 586
|
Absolutely I vote DSSD. If not then I would say SubC but either way Rolex! I wear a Sub daily and it's the nicest all around watch I've ever owned. I could have gone Omega a number of times over but the Rolex just has it all. I would like to own an 8500 PO but I would always go Rolex first if I could only swing one.
|
5 July 2012, 09:53 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
|
Well IMHO if money is no object get the 1 you like. The seamaster used is always about 1/2 the price of the Submariner and at times 1/3. Its a matter of opinion what is the better of the 2.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting |
5 July 2012, 09:54 AM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: California
Watch: PATEK, AP, ROLEX
Posts: 639
|
sub lv
|
5 July 2012, 10:21 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
|
5 July 2012, 10:41 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,238
|
Get a DSSD! Every college graduate gets the Bond seamster especially after the latest Bond movie
|
5 July 2012, 10:57 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Watch: Oyster Perpetual
Posts: 1,629
|
|
5 July 2012, 11:11 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,002
|
__________________
Licensed to kill time. |
5 July 2012, 11:28 AM | #46 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 39
|
[/QUOTE] My, my, my.. both these watches makes me moist |
5 July 2012, 11:29 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
What is your definition of "best"?
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
5 July 2012, 11:33 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
|
5 July 2012, 12:32 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
Get whatever that makes you happy. You're asking this in a Rolex forum, you will get some biased answer to your Q's :)
I'd say screw the sub and get the SD
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
5 July 2012, 12:42 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Been reading the post and someone mentioned that an Omega is . . .
We'll most of the TRF'ers also own a Speedy because it's a great watch and good looking ! Maybe you can't compare them with a Rolex . . . but a nice Pre-Moon . . Mmmmmm Love them ! If money doesn't matter . . . go for the DSSD . . . My .02 Good luck HAGOne |
5 July 2012, 01:18 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
I agree 100 % with Chris (The GMT Master) - the new Omega PO is a fantastic watch and should be seriously considered as a rival to the Sub.
|
5 July 2012, 03:17 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Omar
Location: Centre County PA
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 101
|
Yup , Believe me, Go sub first, then buy an Omega later
|
5 July 2012, 03:33 PM | #53 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 39
|
So today while out seeing Spider-Man (great reboot BTW) I tried on these bad boys
And I must say that my hearts a little broken. As much as I wanted a DateJust it's really not the watch for me. It has plenty of bling but it just didn't feel right. I listened to your suggestions and tried on the Submariner and the Sea Dweller. At first I didn't care about any other Rolex besides the DJ but now I want a Sub or SD REAL BAD!! Preferablly the Dweller because it is larger but I'd be happy with either. BUT.. That Planet Ocean.. That watch is a PROBLEM! I loved it! I went in having my mind already made up about going Rolex but after trying on the Planet Ocean I'm stuck. I loved the weight of the PO. The Rolex feel extremely light on me wrist but the PO felt like it was there. Not heavy but it's almost feel like my wrist is naked when wearing the Rolex, well at least the Sub. But with that said the feel of the Rolex is something I could get used to, it's just a different feeling than what I'm used to. I guess the PO felt more familiar to my wrist. But man am I in a conundrum. I have the money to get a slightly used or even new PO right now but probably not for a used SUB or SD. All three are great watches but I would hat the feeling of regret of buying the PO just because I can definitely afford one and later on kick myself in the but for not waiting and getting one of the Rolex. I may not regret it but I don't know if I'm ready to make that gamble. If anyone has both your thoughts on this would be useful. Have any of you went from a Rolex to a PO or PO to Rolex? How was it? What was your reasoning? For those who tried on both what made you buy or fall for the watch you own or want to own? |
5 July 2012, 03:35 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
|
5 July 2012, 03:40 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 28
|
I have both! cause sometimes you feel like a Connery and sometime you feel like a Brosnan...
~Ron |
5 July 2012, 03:45 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
|
Get an omega and you will always dream of the Rolex.
Get a Rolex and never dream of an omega. Although it is a great watch, wearing a Rolex opens more doors. I like the subs but it is a very common watch. I am liking even more the GMT's. More rare and with the ceramic - perfect choice! |
5 July 2012, 04:03 PM | #57 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,533
|
The op is looking for something flashy... Id recommend a yellow gold day date.
|
5 July 2012, 04:09 PM | #58 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,533
|
Quote:
|
|
5 July 2012, 04:11 PM | #59 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Alfred
Location: DC Metro
Watch: None
Posts: 29,368
|
Quote:
__________________
NEED PC HELP? ASK HERE! Watches: Patek 5205G | Patek 5167A | 16613 Serti | 116718 Green | 216570 Black | 16700 Pepsi Wish list: Patek 5726/1 | AP RG Ceramic | Patek 5712 | Patek 5130 |
|
5 July 2012, 05:03 PM | #60 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 39
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.