ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 June 2012, 09:09 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,735
|
Rolex GMT Tiffany Dial ??
Dial looks questionable! The crown does not look right.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-Vintag...item3a7584ff88 . |
10 June 2012, 09:23 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Tom
Location: Victorville CA
Watch: Rolex DSSD 116660
Posts: 3,189
|
Hmmm.. Seller looks ok.. You've got me
__________________
T-Rip Formally known as Haydendillon Rolex: DSSD 116660, 16622 PLATTY |
10 June 2012, 02:03 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Brian
Location: Manhattan
Watch: 116520 Black
Posts: 287
|
Shouldn't the crown be more on top of the L in Rolex? Perhaps a refinished dial?
|
10 June 2012, 02:30 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
I know these exist with Tiffany On the dial, called double signed dials, I have never owned one or seen the dial in real life. I think it's fairly uncommon, not sure it meets criteria for rare or not . Looks ok but I do not claim to be an expert in these, I am sure some vintage experts will advise.
__________________
watches many |
10 June 2012, 06:15 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex vintage
Posts: 1,062
|
Agree.
I'm not a Tiffany specialist as well. I have one, and seen a couple. Cartier and Tiffany models are rare and sell for a premium. But there are so many fakes... With this watch, I have a problem with the crown and the underlined "O". Quote:
|
|
11 June 2012, 02:15 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Watch: 'chu lookin' at???
Posts: 964
|
Very nice to hear from you though...
__________________
"Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." Mark Twain "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson SS Midsize DJ 68274 "L" TT Jubilee DJ 116233 "Z" Sea Dweller DS 116660 "V" SS White Dial Daytona "V" |
11 June 2012, 08:22 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
|
Yes,questionable at best and counterfeit at worst.
|
11 June 2012, 10:55 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Public holiday in the state i live in Australia today, so had some spare time to hit my books, I cannot see any original Tiffany dial with an underlined letter O, secondly, I can find no dial where the words tiffany and co, are longer than the words below it on the dial " gmt master " like this one, the spacing seems wrong. Those are my thoughts anyway.
__________________
watches many |
12 June 2012, 09:56 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Norm, if that isn't a re-dial, its a one-of-a-kind. The swiss t<25 is not correct - along with the coronet. All the Tiffany dials I have seen in the past look like regular dials with the addition of the Tiffany script.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
12 June 2012, 12:03 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 19
|
The dial looks all wrong, and even with that wear, the hands shouldn't be that corroded.
If water did that to the hands, its probably a leaky fake. If it isn't a leaky fake, then it still had water in it and the movement may be shot. |
12 June 2012, 12:03 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
interesting
__________________
It's been said that money can never buy happiness which is true, but I'd rather cry while seated in the back of a Rolls Royce limousine instead crying while seated on a bicycle. |
12 June 2012, 05:51 PM | #12 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,735
|
Quote:
My thoughts exactly, the only thing added to the dial is the "Tiffany" write up. The rest should match the time period. |
|
17 June 2012, 09:18 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,735
|
|
18 June 2012, 09:13 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Reported again
__________________
watches many |
19 June 2012, 12:30 AM | #15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Quote:
|
|
19 June 2012, 09:00 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
Good eye! I didn't notice that. Now it is obvious.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
23 June 2012, 06:48 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NC/USA
Posts: 295
|
I have owned what I believe to be an original tiffany dial rolex...I sold it way too cheaply, one of my wish I didn't do that sales...but I did have it verified by several dealers who claim they could tell by the font, the paint, and the age to it. Yeah I am sure it could have still been faked anything is possible, but my font was slightly different then what you have here. Although I think you will find the majority of these have a font closer to what mine had. Really shouldn't have sold it, the non quickset got to me though. Here it is...
|
23 June 2012, 06:50 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NC/USA
Posts: 295
|
although I must say my photography skills were not great (still aren't) and in that pic it looks like it had a stainless crown, but it was 18k WG to match the bezel.
|
9 July 2012, 04:39 AM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,735
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.