ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 November 2012, 06:49 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Felix
Location: New York->Detroit
Watch: Cat Wall Clock
Posts: 687
|
So a friend shows me two Rolex's and I think hard...
So a friend inquires about one of my listings and beings to ask me questions about her own Rolex's. I said I couldn't offer any help unless I can see a picture of them. She said she was too lazy to take any up close shots and decided to give me an older pic that was taken a long time ago. She said she purchased them at an AD but I am left scratching my head very very hard. I personally think the watches look a bit funky. What is the TRF consensus?
|
8 November 2012, 07:40 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Can't give you any advice . . . pic quality is to low to zoom in . .
HAGOne |
8 November 2012, 08:00 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
|
Pic quality makes them look suspicious but I agree with you Marc.
__________________
'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill |
8 November 2012, 09:15 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Rochester/Naples
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 18,307
|
Her pic is as fuzzy as her comment about being "too lazy" to take a new picture.
Everyone has a camera on their phone. Something doesn't sound right here. |
8 November 2012, 09:41 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
I'm too lazy to provide info based on those pics.
|
8 November 2012, 09:44 PM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Quote:
|
|
8 November 2012, 10:46 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
|
10 November 2012, 12:38 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Felix
Location: New York->Detroit
Watch: Cat Wall Clock
Posts: 687
|
Yea, I agree with everyone here. It's very hard to make a comment since the picture quality is abysmal.
|
10 November 2012, 12:57 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
|
With friends like that..........
|
10 November 2012, 01:09 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Hamilton, MI USA
Watch: My beloved TT DJ
Posts: 3,831
|
Does your friend have any bridges he wants to sell?
__________________
My Trusty TT DJ |
10 November 2012, 01:15 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
I'm too lazy to opine.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
10 November 2012, 01:36 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
|
These are junk, plain and simple !
thread flagged and reported - !
__________________
*Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !
|
10 November 2012, 01:41 PM | #13 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
|
This is a question that should be asked in the 'watchout section'....
Both watches are suspect to say the least! Thread now moved!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
10 November 2012, 01:46 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Looks like junk, photos are very poor quality, but it still looks of poor quality.
__________________
watches many |
10 November 2012, 05:43 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Felix
Location: New York->Detroit
Watch: Cat Wall Clock
Posts: 687
|
Well, I feel she may have been genuinely duped years ago. Whenever you tell someone their things are fake, you can get a variety of reactions. When I told her that I had a nagging suspicion they were phonies, she became defensive. So instead of being aggressive about it, I told her that in her own time she could check a few things that I thought were off on the watch and things to look out for. She stayed adamant about the watches but that is normal for this circumstance. Who wants to be told their things are fake, especially when you are genuinely convinced they are real? Admittedly she said she does not know much about watches. I did the best I could to inform a friend, but at least I left her with some knowledge and perhaps she can find this fellow in the future and stuff the junk up his trunk. Thank you TRF with your responses!
|
11 November 2012, 02:09 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,872
|
I agree with BOTH of these gentlemen. Your 'friend' and her watches are both full of it.
__________________
|
11 November 2012, 11:50 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,013
|
What questions did she ask you???
If I follow the story here, she purchased them at an AD - therefore she could not be wondering about their authenticity.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
11 November 2012, 01:10 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Felix
Location: New York->Detroit
Watch: Cat Wall Clock
Posts: 687
|
I had a listing up for an older datejust oysterquartz which I sold. She thought It was the same as hers but described it very oddly. I doubted she knew what she was talking about by her generalizations, so I asked her to produce some photos so I can verify what she said. She gave me those pictures and said she think its the same as the 17000 and I said no. She was wondering how much her watches were worth and I said I could not begin to estimate as I need better pictures. She said she bought them for "a lot" of money and I left it at that. The next day, I looked closely at the pictures and noticed some things that might have been off, I then told her about my feelings and reasons for them and she got offended and said she couldn't have gotten fakes since she in her own words said, "I got it at the dealer. I also have the birth papers." She said they were purchased in 2008 and didn't want to tell me the first letter of the serial as she was again, too lazy to check the warranty or hang tags. She then quickly said gtg and never spoke to me about it again.
She didn't question the authenticity by posing a question to me, rather I was the one who approached her about the authenticity because from the fuzzy/grainy photos, it still looked a bit off to me. |
11 November 2012, 01:12 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio,UnitedStates
Watch: ROLEX OMEGA
Posts: 1,458
|
No help here. I'd say fake based on one thing. Why would you ask a friend questions about your watch if you just had a pic. 1. Not serious, 2. Fake and didn't want you to see them. Also I think one is for sure suppposed to be a TT model and the gold looks really bad. Very bad.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.