ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Aisa311 · 21 January 2013, 02:00 AM

Hi, I'm new to RF and have a question about NATO straps. On Broadarrow, there are two styles I'm interested in: NATO Four Ring and NATO Mil Series. Does anyone know if there are dimensional differences between the two, especially in regards to thickness? I actually prefer the looks of the Mil Series, but want to make sure it'll fit my Sub. I've read that other similar straps such as Zulu are too thick and difficult to thread through the spring bars. The website says the Mil Series is an upgraded version and I'd like to make sure it's the same thickness as the standard NATO. Any feedback would be appreciated!

-aisa311

ecsub44 · 21 January 2013, 02:19 AM

In my experience, the 4-ring and any labeled as "Zulu" are thicker than the rest. This thickness can cause difficulty is putting on the strap.

Rather than fitting the springbars and then fishing the strap through, I've been more successful at placing the head of the watch where I want it and then fitting the springbars over the strap.

It can still be a bit tough to do. As a result, I rarely use the 4-ring or Zulus anymore.

swish77 · 21 January 2013, 02:19 AM

The Zulu NATOs are definitely super thick. They do fit through the spring bars with some force, but barely. The solution is to get the two-piece version, which is also better because it won't scratch your case-back.

Aisa311 · 21 January 2013, 02:57 AM

I'm specifically interested to know if there's a thickness difference between the Four Ring NATO and the Mil Series NATO. The latter looks much better, but since it's "Mil Series", I was afraid it may be too thick.

Dr. Robert · 21 January 2013, 05:49 AM

Get the basic Maratac NATO, it has thinner fabric & works w/ Rolex & Tudor watches.

ecsub44 · 21 January 2013, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aisa311

I'm specifically interested to know if there's a thickness difference between the Four Ring NATO and the Mil Series NATO. The latter looks much better, but since it's "Mil Series", I was afraid it may be too thick.

Mil-series is thinner than the Zulu or 4-ring.

Basically Broadarrow has two different thicknesses. Anything that says "Zulu" or has those 4-rings is thick. Everything else is thin.

Cabaiguan · 21 January 2013, 09:30 AM

Mil is as thin as the NATO and will fit the Sub without issues. The Zulu on the other hand is thicker. You have to take the springbars off to install most Zulu-type bands.

21 January 2013, 02:00 AM	#1
Aisa311 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: North Carolina Posts: 7	Maratac NATO Hi, I'm new to RF and have a question about NATO straps. On Broadarrow, there are two styles I'm interested in: NATO Four Ring and NATO Mil Series. Does anyone know if there are dimensional differences between the two, especially in regards to thickness? I actually prefer the looks of the Mil Series, but want to make sure it'll fit my Sub. I've read that other similar straps such as Zulu are too thick and difficult to thread through the spring bars. The website says the Mil Series is an upgraded version and I'd like to make sure it's the same thickness as the standard NATO. Any feedback would be appreciated! -aisa311

21 January 2013, 02:19 AM	#2
ecsub44 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: US Watch: Sub Posts: 3,175	In my experience, the 4-ring and any labeled as "Zulu" are thicker than the rest. This thickness can cause difficulty is putting on the strap. Rather than fitting the springbars and then fishing the strap through, I've been more successful at placing the head of the watch where I want it and then fitting the springbars over the strap. It can still be a bit tough to do. As a result, I rarely use the 4-ring or Zulus anymore. __________________ *侘寂 -- wabi-sabi --* acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44

21 January 2013, 05:49 AM	#5
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,260	Get the basic Maratac NATO, it has thinner fabric & works w/ Rolex & Tudor watches. __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

21 January 2013, 09:30 AM	#7
Cabaiguan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Raf Location: NJ Watch: GMTII Posts: 2,155	Mil is as thin as the NATO and will fit the Sub without issues. The Zulu on the other hand is thicker. You have to take the springbars off to install most Zulu-type bands. __________________ "A ship of war is the best ambassador." - Oliver Cromwell

21 January 2013, 02:19 AM	#3
swish77 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Aaron Location: CT/NYC Watch: ing the time! Posts: 6,999	The Zulu NATOs are definitely super thick. They do fit through the spring bars with some force, but barely. The solution is to get the two-piece version, which is also better because it won't scratch your case-back.

21 January 2013, 02:57 AM	#4
Aisa311 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: North Carolina Posts: 7	I'm specifically interested to know if there's a thickness difference between the Four Ring NATO and the Mil Series NATO. The latter looks much better, but since it's "Mil Series", I was afraid it may be too thick.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)