ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 January 2008, 10:24 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
I think this calls for immediate banning, Bo!
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
6 January 2008, 12:07 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
|
[QUOTE=Tools;404922]Put your loupe away...
I agree! |
6 January 2008, 04:27 PM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: singapore
Posts: 101
|
obviously the process for luminova coating on the hands is not well controlled by Rolex, and their QC failed to detect these outgoing comestic defects. tints of grey on the luminova should mean thin coatings, and poor illumination is totally unacceptable. you should get it changed at any RSC
|
7 January 2008, 01:50 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Africa
Posts: 1,127
|
As someone who has had the dial & bezel ring replaced on his GMT11-C along with a couple of regulations and a twisted clasp rectified I guess it is no suprise when I suggest that you visit the RSC in London to get them to have a look at it for you. Despite the problems I have had the RSC have been great and have addressed all my concerns. Might be worth having a chat with them just to ease your mind one way or the other - even if they say that there is a fault and you decide not to replace it at this time then they will record the fact on their database - this should then mean that when the watch is serviced in a few years time you have no problems having the hand replaced under warranty.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.