ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 April 2013, 04:18 AM | #1 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Rolex Corporate Direction (A Friendly Discussion)
The past couple of years have been eye-opening at Basel and elsewhere.. Rolex seems to be on a course that I'm just not sure I can get on board with.. I do think that they have released some spectacular watches.. The new Explorer II is an example - but they almost didn't release it and have not done much to market it.. Other watches that I think could be winners for Rolex, like the Sky Dweller, the new ceramic Daytonas, the new bracelets; they are making only in precious metals and attach stratospheric price-tags on or will not sell modern bracelets and clasps for upgrading early models.. Not a way to keep the faithful who line their corporate coffers.. But this year... the colors the choices (or lack of).. What the heck !!!! They're trotting out 70's Beach Daytona colors (we know how well those sold) with green, salmon (when did a fish become a color) hot pinks, and all manner of gold inlaid gem encrusted dials. There is no innovation in simply proclaiming "Seven new colored dials for the Day-Date" !!! Hardly earth-shaking or even interesting at a major Watch Fair like Basel. Even proclaiming a "new anniversary" Daytona that is nothing more than last years model in platinum wrapping.. Oh, and the ever increasing base prices.. They're now more than double what they were only a short decade ago.. Who is their target customer.. I will have to say that I just don't know any more.. It isn't me and I've been wearing Rolex for more than 30 years..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
26 April 2013, 04:29 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Interesting thread. IMO Rolex is a mass market company. Their target market is people with enough money to buy an expensive watch - watch enthusiasts would be a far distant second. I think Rolex is progressing in exactly the same direction that they have been for at least the last 10 years.
They're cashing in on their heritage and enormous brand value while producing ever more expensive jewelry watches. With that said, there is still more to like from current Rolex than with most other modern brands. Also, Rolex has been producing ghastly models for a long time - the "poo-tona" (as some would call it) is just the most recent in a long line. |
26 April 2013, 04:30 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
i want to see MORE DIAMONDS and even more precious metals. Solid Rhodium completely encrusted with diamonds, rubies, etc. Solid Rhodium Daytona full serti on all facets (including inside the case) as well as serti hands (all hands).
|
26 April 2013, 04:35 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: David Farkas
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116610, 5712/1A
Posts: 8,182
|
In alot of ways I think your right Larry.
One thing I truly love about Patek is they think about the collector when designing a new time pieces. Alot of thought on what the market demands is put into each watch that Patek designs. With Rolex it seems that $$$$ value is leading the design process. |
26 April 2013, 04:35 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
Target markets come and target markets go. The target market of 1990 and 2000 are aging out and eventually dying. Their collections will eventually enter the pre-owned stream.
The new targets may be younger, mobile, trendy, highly leveraged and I think the new colorful DD's could appeal.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
26 April 2013, 04:37 AM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
26 April 2013, 04:42 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: My house
Watch: 519LN | 64A
Posts: 1,241
|
Interesting post. I would tend to agree partially. But Like JP mentioned rolex is one course and staying within the direction they have been for the past decade. I think they're cementing themselves in a market where the customer is indeed people with enough money to buy something expensive...the sky dweller was a neat complication and all but I think their focus has been a little disappointing for long rolex collectors/wearers. Especially people who are watch enthusiast/WIS..including myself. But lets face it, rolex is huge.
A sausage factory (did I just say that on here)....anyways yeah they're a mass market company. Definately making fashion pieces with good movements but they're always on the verge of loosing their tool watch status...which is what made me fall in love with them years ago..I don't know. I still love the brand. Basel was okay this year, love the new SS YM II...I just want to see more. But hey it's gonna be a few more years before I get fed up and walk away from the brand completely. Also agree with the new target market, younger people who are getting to the point where they can afford a Rolex may in fact love where the brand is going. Myself, being in my early 20s does not, but I'm not everyone. I grew up loving old gmt's, old pateks and am a watch nerd. |
26 April 2013, 04:47 AM | #8 | |||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
Quote:
Completely agree. A new direction is needed. Badly. Quote:
Quote:
+1 on the Asia theory. Seems to be the Asian market likes 'different' colors. Salmon/Baby blue/Pink = NOT interested, Barf. |
|||
26 April 2013, 04:47 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Phila burbs
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 755
|
Seems like women is their new target audience.
Seems like what used to be a mans Day Date is all colorful now and full of diamonds. Even the Daytona....it's nice looking watch, but probably better looking on a woman's wrist. I am not knocking women's watches or women who wear watches, but they should have given more for a man to choose from. |
26 April 2013, 04:52 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
|
Quote:
it would be nice to own a DD2 someday, but if i was to get one it would probably be fairly vanilla in terms of style. As for who they are making watches for.....if I had to guess I think they are trying to attract the China market. Most of these type of watches would be quite appealing to them. before anyone jumps on me says I'm stereotyping please know that i am chinese |
|
26 April 2013, 04:53 AM | #11 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
What attracted many to Rolex was an affinity to timeless, durable, well built tool watches. The company is clearly moving in a direction that pleases the masses and leaves some behind. That is ok with me as my passion for Rolex lies in it's watches of yesterday not today or tomorrow. It is a good thing there are choices for us as consumers/collectors so regardless of our likes we have options. Do I agree with the direction Rolex is going in? I guess it doesn't much matter as they clearly know what they are doing. I am just thankful for the deep rich history they left us with their great designs over the many years--with the 50-70's being my favorite! Great thread Larry! Cheers,
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
26 April 2013, 04:56 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
I haven't been wearing Rolex as long as you have but I feel a little disappointed after yesterday. I know Rolex doesn't want to come out with a new model each year because then they will become like some of the lesser valued watch companies that have 30 different models with 100 different variations within each model line. I like this about Rolex.
I know people are different and if we all liked the same things life would be extremely boring, but with the direction Rolex is going each year, I find it harder and harder to find a Rolex that I like. I am a huge sports watch fan but I don't like a sports watch made of precious metals and I really don't like PCLs on a sports watch. And don't get me started on ceramic bezel inserts for sports watches. I do own a 116610LVc and love it immensely, but it will be the ONLY sports watch I have with a ceramic bezel....................hopefully. Luckily, there is always next year. And by the way, I loved your comment "Salmon (when did a fish become a color). That made my day. |
26 April 2013, 04:59 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: USA
Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C
Posts: 1,443
|
The new GMT looks ok. The Daytona would have looked ok with a black bezel and subdials not brown. The YMII (at one time dubbed the clownmaster) was bad in precious metals, it's just as bad in SS. The rest of the DDs with their poor color choices are horrid as well.
I'm with you Larry, I'm definitely not their target customer anymore. I always loved the classic tool watches and I even like the newer Explorer II and blue dial Yachtmaster but this year was a whole other story... |
26 April 2013, 05:03 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
If I had to choose from the watches released, it would only be the GMT. The others....ehhh. I'll wait for next year.
|
26 April 2013, 05:05 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: USA
Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C
Posts: 1,443
|
This could be part of it. Take Omega for example - the constellation line is the biggest seller over in Asia and Americans won't hardly touch it.
|
26 April 2013, 05:08 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
That's the market right there. Rolex is designing it's models to satisfy the Asian market, point blank....
|
26 April 2013, 05:11 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Robert
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 76
|
Totally agree with Larry. Make a ss Sky Dweller, e.g. OK, a ss YM II, but at what price? My guess is at least 50% more than a Sub. I still would like to add another Rolex or 2 (or 3, etc.!) to my watch collection, but they will have to be pre-owned classics. Nothing wrong with that, but would like to be able to at least consider a new watch from an AD. And jeweled watches for men? My wife loves her diamond bezel day-date, but I am way too conservative for that.
|
26 April 2013, 05:11 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: London
Watch: Sub c, smp
Posts: 327
|
Yeh seriously questioning their design team lately. What are the new dd variants all about, just tacky and dated. And yes the new daytona is to me a ladies watch, but with a really bad colour combination, again quite tacky.
There has been some great upgrades in recent years, i love the sub/gmt upgrades and the dd2, but these were based on absolute classics, so it would have been hard to get these too wrong. Also a lot of the newer watches such as the skyd and yachtmaster 2 just dont quite work from an aesthetic point of view as perhaps they could have. And colour combinations seem just wrong sometimes, the Daytona has had some frankly awful iterations in recent years They seem to be going down a very tacky road that I feel ultimately will make them a comedic brand |
26 April 2013, 05:12 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
Some solid points. Being only 34 years young, I can see a lot more women making more money than many men I know, and many being the sole bread winner. Rolex could be targeting their pockets with a few watches that would wear better. A few of the DD's definitely have a touch of femininity to them (and being on a leather strap makes them affordable to many), although some men would like them as well. I enjoy the simplicity of the older models, and am thankful that I have been able to afford and purchase the ones that have caught my eye and heart.
Excellent thread Larry, and I can't wait for the day I can say I've been wearing Rolex watches for 30 years!
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
26 April 2013, 05:17 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 195
|
I agree with Knappo1307, but it would be interesting to hear this from the horse's mouth, kind of like Omega did when they revamped their Constellation line, esp. for a particular market.
Maybe it's all so obvious it's not worth saying, but it would at least speak to target audiences elsewhere to inform them that they are still important customers. One big difference- I don't think Rolex cares too much about short term customer interests, as they seem to move more slowly. As long as customers keep buying whatever their designers dream up, it's in a way justified. |
26 April 2013, 05:20 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,507
|
As long as I like at least one model from Rolex (5 for me right now), that is fine with me.
It's impossible for anyone to like ALL Rolex offerings, because they are made to satisfy different tastes. So I guess what I'm saying is, I don't know what all the whining is about. |
26 April 2013, 05:21 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: London
Watch: Sub c, smp
Posts: 327
|
Quote:
|
|
26 April 2013, 05:24 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Chris
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
|
I'm happy to see a thoughtful thread on this topic. Overall, choices to appeal to a variety of tastes represents a good thing for any large company marketing a product. However, the newer releases have felt like a significant shift to me, in that nothing in the last few years (other than the EXPII) has really appealed to me. It seems that they are "all in" with a direction that is decidely different that what drew me in to begin with. I have warmed up to a few models - the Rose Gold/Ceramic Bezel/Chocolate Dial Daytona being an example - but not enough to get serious about purchasing.
I do find it interesting that a lot of younger affluent professionals have gravitated so solidly to the vintage Rolex market. To a lot of folks, there is nothing cooler than one of the old classics. As long as that interest exists, then I suppose there is hope that future designs could come back to us..... |
26 April 2013, 05:29 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
I say vote with your wallet- if you still like the brand, stick with the old design used market and rant away here. If you want whatever is newest, you'll probably convince yourself that the new designs are worth your cash. And in time if your tastes change, the used pieces will always be there for you to buy... or a seller will be there to buy your "mistake"! |
|
26 April 2013, 05:38 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
|
Quote:
I haven't worn a Rolex nearly as long but will get back to vintage that brought me to Rolex in the first place. I'll likely acquire a birth year 16750 or Tudor Sub, then gracefully walk into the sunset without looking back on Rolex ever again. X 100000 |
|
26 April 2013, 05:41 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: johannesburg
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 4,407
|
A lot of us seem a bit disappointed and as I have said on other posts, there is nothing from 2013 that jumps to the top of my wish list, but maybe we expect too much and the expectation sets us up to be disappointed, but Rolex keep true to their DNA and all of this years releases are 100% Rolex
|
26 April 2013, 06:06 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
They have made alot of "simple" mistakes this year and I agree probably because new money from the Asian and Russian markets are far more important than the old money of the west.
Simple mistakes like a Platinum Daytona with brown, not black or platinum bezel, and no ceramic ss Daytona at all, and no Pepsi or Coke GMTc. I think it might be time we as a forum send a group email or bunch of them telling the "design team" what true Rolex lovers really want. It cant only be money that dictates what they make and unless we voice a collective opinion they might even be thinking we like all these idiotic decisions. Whether it works or not I think its now time TRF ought to speak directly with Rolex. |
26 April 2013, 06:15 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Watch: SubC
Posts: 1,014
|
As long as Rolex makes good Subs -- and I like the SubC -- I really don't care what other goofy watches it makes.
|
26 April 2013, 06:16 AM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
I don't think 2013 was the year all of this began. Quite honestly, this train has sailed
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
26 April 2013, 06:16 AM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.